SP-ACTA-2022-02-04 · 2022-02-04
4 February 2022 · project and unitary operation
Alleged adverse perimeter · Acosta Matos/CAM phase
C2 Alleged adverse · Acosta Matos/CAMLater phase attributed by Gil; not a judicial finding of joint conduct or guilt.
Capacity and attributed sequence
Separate mandates; visible transitions.
Sequence attributed by Gil Marer and the project's documentary classification. Every person, company, office, representation and act remains separate and must be proved source by source. It is not an adjudicated finding of conspiracy, fraud, criminal purpose, liability or guilt.
No documented event-specific capacity
The controlled sources for this family do not prove an event-specific capacity.acosta-matos-cam-stage · ACOSTA_MATOS_CAM
Identity control: Patricia Isabel Domínguez Montelongo and Laura Patricia Acosta Matos are different people; 'Patricia' is never used to merge them. Inference boundary: A Pink Canary Services role, personal participation or a later statement does not become representation of the Community, CEXP, LPB, Aweswell or another entity for this event.
Authorship and documentary control
Calling, chairing, drafting and custody are not the same function.
C · Alleged adverse lineage · dissidents → Acosta MatosC2 · C1 identifies the Aizpurúa/Molina–Roque Prieto/FMMM/Pamanil–Cogolludo phase; C2 identifies the later Acosta Matos/CAM phase. The arrow records Gil's attributed sequence and documented nodes, not proved legal succession, common control, agreement, illegality or guilt.
Rule: Attendance, representation, finance, later benefit or signature does not by itself make a person the convener, chair, author or custodian.
Historical LPH control
Five gates: call → service → vote → minutes → circulation.
CAM/project node: 20.993% recorded, CAM project, levy and LPB debt; Gil/Aweswell allege no notice and no direct communication.
The minutes record the body and chair, but the native notice, exact authority and served agenda are unlocated.
LPH arts. 13, 16 · facial concern / alleged non-complianceGil states that his perimeter received no invitation or prior knowledge; the owner-by-owner package needed to prove or refute selection, error or alternative service is missing.
LPH arts. 9.1.h, 16 · facial concern / alleged non-complianceThe minutes record 20.993%, call CAM the majority owner and charge LPB at 72.976% in the annex; title, proxies, debt, conflicts, abstentions and item-by-item votes require reconciliation.
LPH arts. 15, 17, 21 · facial concern / alleged non-complianceThree seven-page variants are controlled; the diligenced book, closure, signatures, annexes and audio remain open.
LPH arts. 19, 20 · source located; proof incompleteGil attributes later knowledge to Thompson forwarding rather than direct Community delivery; native message, hash, upstream chain, official service and later uses remain open.
LPH arts. 9.1.h, 18, 19, 21 · facial concern / alleged non-complianceHistorical text: Consolidated text after the amendment published on 6 October 2021 and in force on 4 February 2022, checked article by article. BOE →
Who called or generated the record
Community minutes recording interventions by José Daniel Acosta Matos, a CAM-supplied project and authorisations to the chair; complete notice, proxies and abstentions remain open.
Classification basis
An Acosta Matos/CAM–Community phase source. Gil attributes it to the adverse perimeter and challenges authority, voting and conflict; the minutes do not turn those allegations into findings or by themselves prove valid finance or licensing.
Open public redacted textText-edition PDFRedacted source facsimileIntegrity manifestProvenanceRedaction logMachine continuity indexSource and communications register
Boundary: Gil states that no invitation or pre-meeting knowledge reached his perimeter and that the Thompson family forwarded the ACTA only after the meeting. He reports no direct Community communication; the native message, time, upstream chain and hash comparison remain open.
Document family
Every notice, ACTA, annex, circulation, implementation and reliance keeps its own ID.
An entry does not turn an email into minutes or receipt into authority, validity or intent.
SP-EVT-2020-2021-NO-ACTA-LOCATED
2020–2021 · negative-search-record
- Issuer / sender
- repository/source review
- Capacity
- finite-search recorder; not a historical meeting issuer
- Recipients
- public register readers
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- no Community ACTA located in the finite searched universe
- Public / private
- public metadata; no underlying ACTA located
- Open issues
- original books, officeholder files, all custodians and deleted/outside systems remain unsearched or incomplete; absence is not nonexistence
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
- —
SP-EVT-2020-AEAT-PINK-SELECTION
2020-07–2020-12 onward · tax-inspection-selection-and-commencement-records
- Issuer / sender
- AEAT
- Capacity
- tax authority; each act's author/signatory and statutory capacity source-specific
- Recipients
- taxpayer/procedural recipients; identities and tax data restricted
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- controlled tax registers; tax secrecy and complete intake/reliance record apply
- Public / private
- private/restricted; public chronology summary only
- Open issues
- complete provenance/intake, source-by-source reliance, procedural record and tax-secrecy review remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2022-02-04-COM-MEETING
2022-02-04 · acta
- Issuer / sender
- Owners' Community
- Capacity
- Community record; CAM-supplied project and José Daniel Acosta Matos interventions recorded
- Recipients
- owners/participants; complete service, proxy and entitlement denominator unresolved
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting · complete legal-convener authority open
- Provenance
- control copy and alternate variant located; public redacted digitisation
- Public / private
- private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- native/variant comparison, manual verification, audio, annexes, title, notice, proxies, conflicts, votes and payments remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2022-05-03-10-ACTA-TRANSMISSION
2022-05-03–2022-05-10 · email-transmission-of-actas-and-related-material
Open the canonical document entry →
- Issuer / sender
- private correspondents; identities minimized in public ledger
- Capacity
- document senders/forwarders; no truth, adoption or pre-meeting knowledge inferred
- Recipients
- private recipients; exact capacities incomplete
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- direct correspondence and attachments located
- Public / private
- private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- native headers, attachment hashes, direct versus indirect recipients, acknowledgement and downstream use remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-REL-2022-PROJECT
2022 onward · project-licence-finance-reliance-record
- Issuer / sender
- project/licence/unitary-operation/levy actors as separately documented
- Capacity
- each public/private actor's capacity and authority must be proved separately
- Recipients
- Yaiza, Cabildo, tourism authorities, financiers/investors and other recipients if evidenced; complete list open
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- source family exists and later actors cite the meeting; complete reliance chain incomplete
- Public / private
- mixed private/public summaries
- Open issues
- title/authority supplied, exact recipients, verification, financing, payment and implementation remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-REL-AEAT-PINK
2020 onward · tax-reliance-record
- Issuer / sender
- AEAT and procedural participants
- Capacity
- tax authority/taxpayer/procedural capacities; tax secrecy applies
- Recipients
- taxpayer, representatives and reviewing bodies; details restricted
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- controlled tax record indicates multiple source types; full intake/reliance chain incomplete
- Public / private
- private/restricted; public chronology summary only
- Open issues
- complete intake, each statement/document-to-adjustment bridge and Audiencia Nacional record remain open; 2022 sources did not originate 2020 selection
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-ACTA-2022-02-04
2022-02-04 · source-copy-of-acta
- Issuer / sender
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting
- Capacity
- meeting body or recorded event; individual capacities remain source-specific
- Recipients
- historical recipients/participants as separately recorded; complete original recipient/service denominator unresolved
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting · Community-organ action and CAM/José Daniel Acosta Matos interventions are recorded; complete legal-convener proof open.
- Provenance
- located seven-page package control copy
- Public / private
- private native/control source; public irreversible redacted raster facsimile, source-page gallery, OCR text edition and text-edition PDF available through the linked event page
- Open issues
- native master, variants, notice, annexes, audio, title/proxies/votes open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-ACTA-2022-02-04-ALT
2022-02-04 · source-copy-of-acta
- Issuer / sender
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting
- Capacity
- meeting body or recorded event; individual capacities remain source-specific
- Recipients
- historical recipients/participants as separately recorded; complete original recipient/service denominator unresolved
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting · Community-organ action and CAM/José Daniel Acosta Matos interventions are recorded; complete legal-convener proof open.
- Provenance
- separate seven-page binary variant recorded in section 4
- Public / private
- private preserved source/variant; public-safe metadata and relationship only unless included in the linked control-copy package
- Open issues
- native master, all alternate relations/highlighting provenance and annexes open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-ACTA-2022-02-04-ALT-3492026
2022-02-04 · source-copy-of-acta
- Issuer / sender
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting
- Capacity
- meeting body or recorded event; individual capacities remain source-specific
- Recipients
- historical recipients/participants as separately recorded; complete original recipient/service denominator unresolved
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community extraordinary meeting · Community-organ action and CAM/José Daniel Acosta Matos interventions are recorded; complete legal-convener proof open.
- Provenance
- separately hashed seven-page highlighted sibling binary
- Public / private
- private preserved source/variant; public-safe metadata and relationship only unless included in the linked control-copy package
- Open issues
- material equivalence, provenance/authenticity and official-book relation remain open unless separately stated
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
Event-by-event audit
What happened, what was communicated and what remains open.
Occurrence, authority, quorum, voting, validity, implementation, knowledge, intent, causation and legal characterisation remain separate.
| Before | No Community ACTA was located for 2019–2021 in the finite search; 2020 AEAT activity is a separate earlier track and cannot be sourced to this meeting. |
|---|---|
| Knowledge | Per Gil's current evidence, he had no invitation, pre-meeting knowledge or direct Community ACTA communication; later indirect forwarding is separately recorded. |
| Notice and service | Complete notice, agenda, recipients and service proofs are not located. |
| Omitted / excluded allegation | Gil alleges exclusion/lack of notice; the complete owner, coefficient, proxy and service denominator remains unproved. |
| Convener | The minutes record Community-organ action, José Daniel Acosta Matos interventions and a CAM-supplied project; complete legal-convener proof remains open. |
| Body | Owners' Community extraordinary meeting. |
| Attendance and representation | Attendance, proxies, voting entitlement, conflicts and abstentions remain incomplete. |
| Proposals and voting | Project, licence, unitary operation, levy, authority and debt decisions are recorded; exact wording, entitlement and title basis require verification. |
| Objections and reservations | No complete contemporaneous objection set is located; later project-side challenge and lack-of-notice account are preserved separately. |
| Minutes and versions | Seven-page control copy digitised; a second seven-page highlighted/binary variant is preserved and requires native comparison. |
| Circulation, receipt or withholding | The ACTA was transmitted in May 2022 in located correspondence; Gil's direct Community receipt remains unproved and indirect third-party forwarding requires native-header/upstream closure. |
| Implementation or non-implementation | Title, licence, levy, payments, municipal/Cabildo/tourism, financing and investor actions require source-by-source proof. |
| Later reliance | Later project/licensing actors cite or rely on the meeting; AEAT proceedings use multiple source types but began before it. |
| Contradictory evidence | Gil's attendance at 26 April 2016 is contrary/limiting evidence against a universal no-knowledge theory, but does not prove notice or knowledge of this 2022 meeting. Later receipt does not prove pre-meeting knowledge. |
| Unproved | Complete notice/service, convener authority, quorum, entitlement, conflicts, title, valid resolutions, implementation, direct receipt/withholding, causation, benefit, intent and institutional reliance remain open. |
Controlled reverse reading
What changes on 4 February 2022—and why the meeting cannot be read alone.
The meeting occurs seventeen days before deed no. 457. It does not itself prove a criminal agreement, but it creates a new debt, vote, cost, licence, unitary-operation and potential-benefit node that must be attributed actor by actor.
Aggregate present or represented; the stated unanimity is unanimity among attendees.
Total visually checked against source page 7.
€1,199,729.12 debt plus €3,260,416.81 levy; the sum proves neither validity nor double recovery.
0.770% of the budget; not a transcription from the withheld annex.
Omnidirectional bridge · 2018 → 2022 → later use
The meeting and ACTA are a conversion junction, not an isolated minute.
Gil Marer and Aweswell allege that preparation, selective exclusion, the meeting, resolutions, documentary closure, no direct communication and later use formed one enabling episode. The map displays that prosecution theory. It does not turn its arrows into proved causation or collective guilt.
- Documented
- Attributed allegation
- Inference
- Open proof
- Lawful alternative / contrary
Inputs · conditions created before the meeting
Allegation + documented parts
Documented perimeters
Documented functions · status open
Documents + knowledge inference
Material control and “hotel mobbing”
Access and security, removal of guests, lost operation/cashflow, deterioration or works, frustration of the ONA exit and reduced defensive capacity are alleged as cumulative pressure from 2018.
7 June control →LPB inside; Matkator outside
LPB was in insolvency and subject to insolvency administration and judicial supervision. Matkator was not estate property. No authority over LPB alone covered its units.
Active estate and limits →Captured Community / de facto control
Debt, voting, notice, security, access, maintenance, banking and custody formed a functional apparatus. “Capture” and de facto administrator remain actor-specific legal characterisations to prove.
Audit Community–IA →Project before title
Pilots, plans, the four-sibling image, RICPE promotion and 2021 filings justify production of project and board files. They do not alone prove knowledge of the call.
Pre-title project →Prepare → call → decide → document → communicate or withhold → use
The meeting and its resolutions are documented in a located copy. Deliberate recipient selection, common purpose and every causal use remain open.
- PrepareProject, title, owners, coefficients, debt and budget.
- Design the callOrgan, agenda, first/second call and lawful-recipient list.
- Serve or omitService, returns, noticeboard, powers, conflicts and attendance.
- ResolveDebt, levy, CAM project, licences, bank and unitary operation.
- Construct the ACTARecitals, CAM majority, attendee unanimity, signatures, closure and book.
- Communicate or useDirect delivery, Thompson relay, certificates, litigation, title, works and finance.
Reading rule: each ⇄ means “bridge to prove in both directions”: fact → use/effect and result → document/custodian expected to explain it. It does not mean agreement, intent or causation has been proved.
Outputs · portable capacity created by resolutions and ACTA
Service/use chain open
Temporal link · causation open
Separate tracks · crosswalk pending
Traceable benefit · separate liability
LPH and procedural portability
Debt, loss of vote, absent-owner assent, challenge time, certification and collection depend on valid call and communication. A defective ACTA is not therefore a criminal falsehood.
LPH gates →Procedural/insolvency fraud and deed 457
The prosecution case must identify the false or omitted proposition, user, induced error or patrimonial decision, harm and benefit. The meeting preceded the deed by seventeen days; proximity is not causation.
2022 adjudication →RICPE/RIC · regional incentive · FEDER
Amounts are not added. Cross-match property, work, invoice, job, title/authority statement, other support, payment, certification and beneficiary to detect reuse or incompatibility.
Funds traceability →CAM → HNT → MYND
Segregation, works, operation and revenue permit value and benefit tracing. They do not automatically transfer intent, corporate crime or successor guilt.
Financial lives →“Hotel mobbing”
This is Gil/Aweswell’s attributed umbrella label for sustained pressure on access, guests, operation, assets, evidence, funded exit and defence. It is not a standalone offence: each episode must, if appropriate, satisfy coercion, usurpation, damage, frustration, falsity, disloyal administration or another offence separately.
Were the assets “court-protected”?
The accurate phrase is: LPB assets formally subject to insolvency-administration and judicial-supervision safeguards, whose practical effectiveness is disputed. That is a protection architecture, not a guarantee of outcome. Matkator remained outside it.
De facto administrator does not mean influence
The record supports inquiry into de facto control of discrete functions. Legal status in relation to LPB requires stable autonomous management or habitual decisive influence, instructions followed, continuity, knowledge, benefit and the date-specific standard.
Lawful reading that must be preserved
The minutes distinguish common works said to be “strictly necessary” to operate in the existing one-star category—allocated among owners—from the additional four-star upgrade, which CAM offers to undertake at its own cost. If the debt, notice, votes and technical classification are valid, CAM’s parallel benefit does not turn a common charge into a crime.
Adverse hypothesis that must be proved
If those already preparing the conversion knowingly classified enabling capex as common expense, used materially invalid debt or voting, and shifted cost to LPB and Matkator after depriving them of use and income, the resolution could be an additional patrimonial act. The ACTA calls CAM the majority owner while the annex still charges LPB at 72.976%; both title alternatives must be reconciled. Notice, proxies, coefficients, votes, abstentions, certificates, accounts, project, measurements, invoices, implementation, flows and intent are required.
Not arithmetic
Community, RICPE/RIC, regional incentive, FEDER and operation are separate legal tracks. The test is whether properties, works, invoices, jobs, authority or value were reused, what was disclosed at each gate, and who knew or used a possible falsehood—not the addition of heterogeneous amounts.
LPH and alleged non-knowledge
Gil Marer states that his perimeter received no invitation or pre-meeting knowledge and no direct Community ACTA communication; the Thompson family forwarded the ACTA only after the meeting. Gil and Aweswell allege a unitary sequence of call design, selective service or omission, meeting/resolutions, no direct communication, third-party discovery and later use. It is not proved. The repository contains this ACTA copy, not the native invitation and owner-by-owner service package. LPH Articles 9, 15–19 and 21 require reconstruction of recipient, address, service, first/second call, debt/vote, majority, direct ACTA delivery, actual knowledge, dissent and challenge. Official historical text →
Corrected knowledge route
The allegation is not that the ACTA was never obtained. Gil says it arrived after the meeting through Thompson. The native message, exact time, upstream transmission and hash comparison can prove when and which version reached his perimeter and provide a distribution comparator; they do not alone prove intent.
Alleged pattern from 2016
Gil alleges concealment of certain other meetings or attempts from at least 2016. It must be reconstructed meeting by meeting. The 26-April-2016 meeting was known and attended, preventing any claim that every meeting was concealed.
What the ACTA does prove
It proves the recorded decision instrument, resolutions, 20.993% and timing. It does not itself prove who was called, whether an LPB/Matkator proxy appears in the redacted section, who controlled service, or criminal intent.
Package capable of proving intent
Known correct recipients/addresses + list versions + messages/instructions + unequal service or conscious omission + false recital or selective direct communication + authenticated Thompson/upstream chain + rapid downstream use + reasoned exclusion of error, delegation or insolvency confusion. Each bridge must attribute act, knowledge, purpose and effect to a person.
| Actor / entity | Visible or controlled 2022 fact | Proof still required for responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Francisco Mario Matos Matas secretary-administrator / Pamalexsha lane | The administrator explains the debt; the controlled chronology also places him in administration and the bank-authority lane. | Appointment, custody, calculation, certificates, bank, instructions, knowledge and benefit. |
| José Daniel Acosta Matos chair / project | He explains the only project presented, supplied by CAM; the controlled record identifies him in the chair. | Title and power at date, conflict, vote/abstention, engagement, fees, finance and benefit. |
| Laura Patricia Acosta Matos CAM representation | The public page shows her as legal representative of Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A. | Power, property/coefficient, vote, instructions, title knowledge and purpose. |
| Javier Acosta Matos^ witness/document-first | The public page shows him representing Construcciones Acos-Matos, S.L.^; BORME identifies him as a CAM director in 2020 and Canarian Hospitality director in 2021. | Power, properties/coefficient, actual vote by item, meeting/ACTA/project knowledge, conflict, records and benefit. Offices and attendance do not prove participation. |
| Gerardo Zacarías Acosta Matos^ image/document-custody first | Gil identifies him as the bearded sibling at the far right of the published image; corporate records place him in the perimeter. This ACTA does not record him as an attendee. | Original/metadata, connection of plans to Sun Park, board packs, prior knowledge, communications, custody, implementation, conflict and benefit. The image alone does not prove participation. |
| LPB / Matkator distinct legal persons | LPB was inside Insolvency Proceeding 36/2012; Matkator was outside it. LPB insolvency authority cannot be extended to Matkator. | Individual notice and representation, balances, coefficients, use, fruits, challenges and levy implementation. |
Open the unitary 2018–2022 reconstructionFollow the chain to deed no. 457Structured dataMethod and decisive proofJavier^ · identity and status
Use boundary: the source is a located seven-page copy, not the diligenced minutes book or a certified copy; the OCR is not line-by-line certified. Gil attributes the route to post-meeting Thompson forwarding, but the controlled binary is not yet identified as the native forwarded attachment without the message and hash comparison. Nominal pages 5–6 remain publicly redacted. “Laura”, “José” and “Javier” are transcribed as the public page records them; controlled full names are used only where identity is closed by the repository.
Public redacted source text
Page-sequenced OCR with visible redactions.
This is not an expert transcription or line-by-line certification. Markers preserve withheld or illegible material; an OCR spelling incompatible with a controlled legal entity is normalised and marked.
# Junta General Extraordinaria de la Comunidad - 4 febrero 2022
**Digitalización pública redactada, OCR-asistida y secuenciada por cada página de la copia localizada.**
- ID: `SP-ACTA-2022-02-04`
- Fecha atribuida: `2022-02-04`
- Órgano: Comunidad de Propietarios
- Fuente de control: `copia digital de trabajo`
- Páginas fuente: 7
- SHA-256 de la fuente privada: `bcde60e1bc42bdc6448eb28f1258894746f717a44a342927269549c06ec0666e`
- Estado: copia localizada digitalizada y publicada con redacciones irreversibles
## Advertencia de uso
No es el original, el libro diligenciado, una copia certificada ni una transcripción pericial. El texto cubre secuencialmente todas las páginas de la copia de control, pero el OCR no ha sido certificado línea por línea. Los datos personales, firmas, domicilios, contactos, identificadores, cuentas, tablas por propietario/finca/deuda/voto y anexos reservados se sustituyen por marcadores expresos.
**Control de variante:** Copia localizada; no es el libro diligenciado ni una copia certificada.
## Página fuente 1 de 7
ACTA DE LA JUNTA GENERAL EXTRAORDINARIA
DE LA COMUNIDAD DE PROPIETARIOS SUN PARK
En Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, siendo las 11.00 horas, del viernes 4 de
febrero de 2.022, se da por constituida dicha Junta General Extraordinaria,
asistiendo los copropietarios cuya representacién, coeficiente de participacién, se
relacionan seguidamente, con expresiOn de los que tenian derecho a voto por estar
al corriente del pago de sus obligaciones comunitarias.
ORDEN DEL DiA
1. Fijacién y liquidacién de los saldos deudores de los propietarios morosos al
momento de la celebracién de la Junta y elaboracion de las certificaciones
correspondientes al estado de los saldos deudores. Votacién y aprobaci6én, si
procede, para instar reclamaci6n judicial a los propietarios morosos por cuotas
impagadas y autorizacion al Presidente para representar a Ja Comunidad en estos
procedimientos y autorizacién al Presidente para que en nombre de la
Comunidad otorgue poder para pleitos a favor de abogado y procurador.
2. Aprobaci6én si procede, del proyecto de ejecucién de obras de reformas necesarias
para adaptar el establecimiento turistico a los requisitos de accesibilidad,
habitabilidad y seguridad, y a todas las exigencias que se establecen en la
legislacién turistica de la Comunidad Autoénomo de Canarias, todo ello con la
finalidad de su presentacion en las distintas administraciones publicas.
3. Presentacién de los presupuestos para la reforma de las zonas comunes y/o que
dan servicio al establecimiento turistico, y aprobacién en su caso del mismo, asi
como las medidas econdémicas necesarias para llevarlas a cabo.
4. Ratificacién de las cuentas bancarias existentes y nombramiento de las personas
autorizadas en las mismas.
5. Ruegos y preguntas.
A continuacién se procede a confeccionar la lista de presentes 0 propietarios
representados que asisten a la reunion:
[FIRMA, SELLO O DILIGENCIA DE FIRMA REDACTADA]
## Página fuente 2 de 7
REPRESENTADOS:
Don Javier Acosta Matos en representación de Construcciones Acos-Matos, S.L.
Doña Laura Acosta Matos como legal representante de Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A.
Don José Acosta Matos como legal representante de Proyectos Acosta Matos, S.L.
[RESTANTE LISTA NOMINAL DE PROPIETARIOS/FINCAS, FIRMAS Y DATOS PRIVADOS REDACTADOS]
Coeficiente agregado de participación presente o representada que consta en la página: 20,993%.
1.- Fijacion y liquidacién de los saldos deudores de los propietarios morosos al
momento de la celebracion de la Junta y elaboracién de las certificaciones
correspondientes al estado de los saldos deudores. Votacién y aprobacién, si
procede, para instar reclamacién judicial a los propietarios morosos por cuotas
impagadas y autorizacion al Presidente para representar a la Comunidad en
estos procedimientos y autorizacion al Presidente para que en nombre de la
Comunidad otorgue poder para pleitos a favor de abogado y procurador.
Toma la palabra el administrador para exponer la deuda que mantienen los
propietarios con la comunidad, y a solicitud de D. Manuel Molina Climent, se
explica con detalle el origen de los saldos deudores.
Se aprueba por unanimidad los saldos deudores, y se insta y autoriza al
presidente de la comunidad para _ reclamar_ judicialmente la deuda de los
propietarios morosos.
2.- Aprobacioén si procede, del proyecto de ejecucién de obras de reformas
necesarias para adaptar el establecimiento turistico a los requisitos de
accesibilidad, habitabilidad y seguridad, a todas las exigencias que se
establecen en la legislacién turistica de la Comunidad Aut6énomo de Canarias,
todo ello con la finalidad de su presentacion en las distintas administraciones |
publicas.
Comienza el administrador exponiendo y recordando a los presentes que en la
Junta Extraordinaria de fecha 20 de noviembre de 2.018, se,acord6 en el punto 6.-
del orden del dia seguir profundizando en la eventual \elo ma-del complejo y
solicitud de presupuesto de ejecucién de dichas obras comufigs,
[NOMBRE, CERTIFICADO Y RESIDUOS DE FIRMA DIGITAL REDACTADOS]
- [IDENTIFICADOR REDACTADO] 18:54:18 +01'00" -
## Página fuente 3 de 7
Que habiéndose únicamente presentado a esta Junta, el proyecto de
ejecución aportado por Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A., elaborado por
[NOMBRE DEL PROFESIONAL Y NÚMERO DE COLEGIADO REDACTADOS] del Colegio Oficial de
Arquitectos de Canarias, Demarcacién Gran Canaria, se le da la palabra para
explicar el proyecto de ejecucién de reforma, conservacién y mantenimiento de las
zonas communes, para-la puesta en funcionamiento del complejo en su actual
categoria y clasificacién de apartamentos de una estrella.
Tomando la palabra el sefor José Acosta, éste explica detalladamente el
proyecto del complejo turistico “Sun Park”, dejando claro a los asistentes que este
proyecto solamente recoge las obras estrictamente necesarias para poner el
complejo en funcionamiento su actual categoria y clasificacién turistica. En dicha
explicacion, se muestra el proyecto en soporte papel, y se proyecta en imagenes en
un televisor.
Dado que el tamano del proyecto completo en muy grande y pesado, todo
propietario que lo solicite, la administracion le facilitara via we transfer copia del
proyecto.
Se adjunta resumen del presupuesto y desglose de la derrama perteneciente a
cada uno de los comuneros.
Construcciones Acosta Matos pone en conocimiento de todos los presentes que
la forma de pago de las obras necesarias de las zonas comunes, se estudiaran y
acordaran, caso por caso, por lo que cada comunero, propondra dicha forma de
pago a la comunidad y, esta sera la encargada de pasar esta informacion a la
empresa constructora para intentar llegar a un acuerdo de pago factible para los
comuneros.
Después de las explicaciones dadas, y las aclaraciones solicitadas por los
presentes, se aprueba por unanimidad el proyecto de reformas, conservacién y
mantenimiento de las zonas comunes del Sun Park, aportado por
Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A., y elaborado por Don José Daniel Acosta
Matos, y se autoriza por unanimidad al Presidente de la Comunidad para que
en nombre de la Comunidad de Propietarios puedas_solicitar todos los
permisos y licencias que sean requeridos por las distintas administraciones
publicas, al objeto del comienzo inmediato de las obras de_reforma,
conservacion y mantenimiento de las zonas comunes del complejo turistico
“Sun Park”, asi como solicitar ante el Cabildo de Lanzarote la modificacién de
los datos del establecimiento turistico para la incorporacién de todas las
unidades alojativas y plazas alojativas para las que el complejo fue autorizado
y_ poner el inmueble en explotacién turistica bajo el principio de unidad de
explotacié6n.
3.- Presentaci6én de los presupuestos para la reforma de las zonas comunes y/o
que dan servicio al establecimiento turistico, y aprobacién en su caso del
mismo, asi como las medidas econémicas necesarias para llevarlas a cabo.
Una vez aprobado el punto anterior del orden del dia, el sehor Jog@\Acosta, hace
referencia a las intenciones de Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A ie transformar
el complejo “Sun Park” de apartamentos de una estrella a Hoel de “Heéstrellas, |
cual ya fue aprobado en la anterior junta de noviembre d¢ 2.0\8,/ y para el
[DATO IDENTIFICATIVO, NOMBRE Y RESIDUOS DE FIRMA DIGITAL REDACTADOS]
## Página fuente 4 de 7
presenta un proyecto e infografias, en soporte papel y con imagenes, y se informa
que dado que el principal interesado en el cambio de categoria y clasificacién del
complejo turistico es Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A, por ser el propietario
mayoritario, éste a su cuenta y costa, se ofrece a realizar todas las actuaciones y
obras necesarias para reconvertir el complejo turistico en Hotel de 4 estrellas que
pueda mejorar su calidad, imagen y competitividad con su entorno.
Una vez expuesto, los comuneros presentes manifiestan su satisfaccién y su
predisposicion y facilitar a la entidad Acosta Matos, S.A., para que ésta pueda
realizar el cambio de categoria y clasificacién que reconocen ira en beneficio de
todos los comuneros.
Se aprueba este punto por la unanimidad de los presentes.
4.- Ratificacién de las cuentas bancarias existentes y nombramiento de las
personas autorizadas en las mismas.
Por el administrador se explica que la comunidad tiene abierta tres cuentas
bancarias.
Para evitar gastos de mantenimiento, se aprueba por unanimidad que se cancelen
[DATOS BANCARIOS E IBAN REDACTADOS], manteniendo únicamente una cuenta
[DATOS DE PERSONAS AUTORIZADAS E IDENTIFICADORES REDACTADOS] para cerrar las
cuentas nombradas y operar en la mantenida.
[FIRMA, SELLO O DILIGENCIA DE FIRMA REDACTADA]
5°.- Ruegos y preguntas.
En este punto no hay ruegos ni preguntas por parte de los presentes.
Sin otro particular se levanta la sesién, siendo las 13.45 horas, del dia 4 de
febrero del 2.022.
i | f ao
< 7 'Y fPapsslersna Si.
vy? Be AN ~ - Vv° Be ip
El Presidente El Secretario/administrador
[NOMBRE DE PERSONA Y FIRMA REDACTADOS] PamalexSha Servicios Integrales SL.
[FIRMA, SELLO, CERTIFICADO Y RESIDUOS DE FIRMA DIGITAL REDACTADOS]
La Secretaria
[NOMBRE DE PERSONA Y FIRMA REDACTADOS]
4
## Página fuente 5 de 7
[CONTENIDO REDACTADO - TABLA PROPIETARIOS DEUDA DERRAMA]
Objeto de la página: Relación por propietario/finca, coeficiente, deuda o cuota.
La página permanece contabilizada y secuenciada. Su imagen y texto íntegros se conservan únicamente en la copia privada de procedencia.
## Página fuente 6 de 7
[CONTENIDO REDACTADO - TABLA PROPIETARIOS DERRAMA]
Objeto de la página: Reparto individual de derrama por propietario/finca.
La página permanece contabilizada y secuenciada. Su imagen y texto íntegros se conservan únicamente en la copia privada de procedencia.
## Página fuente 7 de 7
RESUMEN DE PRESUPUESTO
PRESUPUESTO DE COSTES ZONAS COMUNES SUN PARK
CAPITULO RESUMEN EUROS %
0 ZONAS COMUNE Si xcecscvsscarecevcstaveverssucexsscccssvoeavaveswimescoitcseestsgtcsesunea tance keseseectonssrccenenescets 4.467.793,26 100,00
“1 -DEMOLICIONES sassssscanssinanmimeausiccranrcananocanainwansenaaraismsaammannnaimmmamessees ILO TOF
2 ALAIN CER UA sesesasscrasscccssssssascnssseueesicaecssihcalesisabligomaropnyeoromsanepeovernenessovsnrncrstnvnseroneneenes SOOO LO
3 -CUBIERTAS E IMPERMEABILIZACION....ssssecssssessstsnsssstnsesnesusstsntunsiestesaunstsieimnsssinsnsseensmnen 219,440,041
4 SEEVESS TUMMMEEIN TiC scars cararareavnntvcarvvaceartvavenartaniofireticae rs Te lonreistrivagueRepatanrstoracreennteromee ee O ODOM
5 CARPINTERIA: HADDERRA ssassscssszsssss casos sci zeteasseassaussstes aia esane ssa ts ucmesaccsnemremeiintans 2.0 10 Oe
6 “APARATOS GANITARIOG ssssssszsaesasssesiecscaszsuszisstesiostncsbiebhcacnobvidvnsbbevteesegbvsmeornvennsromenenonsenee 090.28
7 sASCENSORES .esssssssesstssssssecssesstessesnnossteasneseessntneenenesesaentsatussnsatsussuenensinusnsssoneneseiniareind9.180,56
8 SPIN TU RAS scasconasecacsonvevssesatcresvsressreiiioranve ntenrcravenninarti comma Ncemnrar atomic SR SG TAT
9 NID RIO sscsssseeseassszzosisasseascose vanszsesrsceszzaveseaeae civ s teas Sve ssc oS Sane passe auaaTocmneeeee COLA TOR
“11 CARPINTERIA -ALUMINIO ssasiziscsscssscssontunssaziesnsanistvaipctaioetarargortrteresneresemsinemsasinvapeanseanpuorsenoneene oP BO40.
-12 “INSTALACIONES ...sscsssesessssssstsssessessstsstsstesnstseststseasetstausssinenaneinisennuanessiumersmeennet O77.226,68
-13 SBURRE Ts GOCINAS | sccranvesreracscsesssrcscressrrcacaveceanesareetentGnicmnitasat peimpoanmaniacsnasemnnomaccne: 41 096055
“14 SRECERGION sisssassscaessesisassicesnnapveygessaucsasss iss deviassvseasa tn avassetecnS ETN RR OROGRIE (ZOO 4B
“15 SRUSOINA sesisaasesceracecarerarssscoisuzenscana gases Gua SGAR WONG INIA ORC AATRG salvia OT ASAD
-16 URBANIZACION occssssssssesseeesnssessetoveestereratiisenseiseetiettenentinsnenseiseiatnmssinesnnsseininees 591+075,00
“17 eVARDINERIA scsssssecsscessstssesestcseseestsnstsssssssessontesssssestensnusenienusnineunsiuminseenenenasnnssianeae 180-000,00
“18 GESTION DE RESIDUOS isisissssisnssasisassiseiesssioseosesaveiooisessiisostsipamaiscnisisistartpuansaceniareinmicieT C098 00
-22 SEGURIDAD Y SALUD sscssesssssscsacorsssssesaresisorasseisnespba tans sistigtacslisiisevittinvmesionaneeieresieesneseoeunmeenis 4 OOOO?
TOTAL EJECUCION MATERIAL 4.467.793,26
TOTAL PRESUPUESTO CONTRATA 4.467.793,26
TOTAL PRESUPUESTO GENERAL 4,467.793,26
Asciende el presupuesto general a la expresada cantidad de CUATRO MILLONES CUATROCIENTOS SESENTA Y SIETE MIL SETECIENTOS
NOVENTA Y TRES EUROS con VEINTISEIS CENTIMOS
, 228 de Enero de 2022.
\ _
El promotor Lag 6n_fa¢bltativa \
iS
[DATO IDENTIFICATIVO, NOMBRE, CERTIFICADO Y RESIDUOS DE FIRMA DIGITAL REDACTADOS]
7
7 source pages
Every page of the current public redacted source PDF
The complete public facsimile is available below and in the dedicated PDF viewer. This recovered reader uses the current reviewed public PDF; separate historical JPEG previews are not published. The source-language transcript above remains available, subject to its stated OCR and source limitations.
Open full PDF viewer · Open / download current public PDF
SHA-256: 607b185074f149572a124a7cee79bb5c72ec12f9a8bbf4a512ec2695ba1ec051
Direct page links
Related actors and entities
The link identifies an event-specific documentary relationship or an expressly labelled succession/context route. It does not by itself prove mandate, convocation, control, joint conduct, validity or guilt.
Continuity