Legal status
Por Derecho remains an initiative in formation. No registered Foundation or separate public-law status is claimed.
Current status · interests · evidence · technology
Phase 1 record · 25 August 2026 · status reconciled 13 September 2026Transparency before authority.
Por Derecho is an initiative in formation. It is not yet a registered foundation, law firm, public authority, complaints service or deployed judicial system. It arose from experience in a matter in which its founder has direct interests. This page states who presently speaks, what is operating, what remains unverified and what is protected.
At a glance
Eight present-tense disclosures
Current facts, proposed future controls and technical pilots are deliberately shown as different states.
Who speaks
Gil Marer is the founder and current public voice of the initiative. No proposed future Board or committee presently exercises authority.
Founding matter
Gil Marer and related entities have direct legal and economic interests in the Sun Park matter. That experience may originate questions; it cannot validate the answers.
Historical actors
Phase 1 uses only names already admitted to the immutable identity registry and reviewed for public use at tiers P0–P3. Inclusion records a role; it does not imply wrongdoing.
Funding
A consolidated present-tense statement on hosting, software, professional costs and in-kind support is being reconciled. This page claims no external grant, donation, sponsorship or institutional funding.
Evidence
Consequential claims must distinguish source, allegation, official outcome, analysis, contradiction, correction and evidence not located.
AI and technology
AI may assist retrieval, structure, translation and drafting under human review. It may not decide guilt, credibility, liability or publication.
Corrections
Material identity, role, date, source and wording corrections should update the same public record. Silence is never treated as admission.
Three separate status axes
“Live”, “verified” and “independent” do not mean the same thing
Every important Por Derecho publication should identify organisational, evidential and technical status separately.
| Axis | Question | Controlled examples |
|---|---|---|
| Organisational status | What legally or institutionally exists? | Current · Initiative in formation · Draft · Planned · Not constituted |
| Evidential status | What does the material establish? | Documented fact · Public record · Attributed statement · Analysis · Disputed · Corrected · Not located |
| Technical status | What system is actually operating? | Live verified · Pilot · Designed · Not implemented · Superseded |
Current governance
Founder-led now; independent architecture proposed, not constituted
Methodological openness must not be confused with present institutional independence.
Present position
Gil Marer is the founder and current public voice. Repository, drafting, translation and technical work may be assisted by people or tools, but no constituted independent body presently has final authority over Por Derecho.
The exact responsible legal publisher, present cost-bearing structure and any additional current decision roles will be added only after factual reconciliation.
Future design
The governance draft proposes a Board, conflicts and integrity function, scientific and method review, executive management and external review. Those descriptions are design instructions—not evidence that the bodies exist.
Historical participation
A name is not an accusation
The historical actor register covers people, organisations, structures, institutions and proceedings connected to the wider Sun Park–MYND Yaiza record, while preserving role, date and source boundaries.
P0
Full public profile
Central documented actor with strong public-interest basis, dated role, sources, limitations and correction route.
P1
Full name, limited role
Name, neutral dated role and source category without extending the allegation beyond the evidence.
P2
Name in source context
Used only where needed to identify a document, office, transaction or material professional act.
P3
Partial identification
Initials, office, company or bounded role where full public identification would be disproportionate.
Completeness and fairness boundary
Phase 1 introduces no new historical actor profile. It relies only on names already admitted to the current immutable registry and approved for public use. The register is versioned and open to correction; it is not represented as proof that no other actor existed or participated. Inclusion does not establish wrongdoing, coordination, knowledge, benefit, responsibility or continuing involvement.
Evidence and publication
Publish enough to verify; withhold only for a stated and proportionate reason
The original or best controlled source remains authoritative. Public summaries, OCR, embeddings and AI output are derivatives.
Acquire and classify
Identify source, authority, matter, version, date and lawful access before analysis.
Test the proposition
Separate documented fact, attributed allegation, inference, official outcome and material contrary evidence.
Protect what must remain private
Assess privilege, personal data, source safety, copyright and evidential integrity.
Human publication decision
State what the source establishes, what it does not establish and what evidence would change the view.
Correct visibly
Material changes retain date, reason, affected page and whether the conclusion changed.
AI and Tech Platform
Implemented controls and unimplemented ambitions are shown separately
Technical organisation supports review. It does not prove truth, admissibility, guilt, liability or entitlement.
Controls described in the Phase 1 record
The 25 August record listed the following controls. For the current method and its limits, read the 12 September operating standard below; this recovery is not a fresh audit of every technical system.
- immutable identity and non-equivalence controls;
- source and matter boundary rules;
- a private/public evidence separation model;
- a bounded RPL 2523 retrieval pilot with known-answer tests;
- human-reviewed publication and correction controls;
- repository and deployment monitoring.
Not claimed as implemented
- a complete private evidence vault for the whole corpus;
- a general private-corpus AI assistant;
- automated legal decisions, guilt or credibility scores;
- automatic website publication by an LLM;
- repository-wide semantic RAG or institutional deployment;
- independent validation or adoption.
Money, support and conflicts
Unknown is published as unknown
A future funding policy cannot substitute for a present-tense financial statement.
Current disclosure
A consolidated statement identifying who pays for hosting, software, formation work, professional services and in-kind support is under verification. Until it is published, Por Derecho does not claim external donations, grants, sponsorship, institutional funding or financial independence.
Current conflict
The founder has a direct interest in the matter from which the methodology arose. No independent decision-maker is yet constituted. Current mitigations are source visibility, contrary evidence, public qualification, correction, right of reply and the ability of future reviewers to reject the founder’s position.
Protected information
Transparency is not indiscriminate disclosure
Por Derecho explains the category and reason when it cannot publish the underlying material.
| Category | Why it may be withheld | Public substitute where appropriate |
|---|---|---|
| Private emails and full headers | Privacy, source protection and data minimisation | Redacted derivative, source status or public-safe summary |
| Privileged legal advice and active strategy | Privilege, representation and fair process | Issue and procedural-status description |
| Protected-source identity | Safety and lawful confidentiality | Anonymous source classification |
| Private vault or provider locator | Security and evidential integrity | Stable public evidence ID, hash and limitation |
| Unnecessary personal data | Necessity and proportionality | Aggregate, role-only or redacted information |
| Unverified allegation | Accuracy and fairness | Open evidence question rather than assertion |
Correction and right of reply
Challenge the identity, role, date, source or conclusion
A response may provide a corrected legal name, office, date, document, contrary primary record or a reply to an attributed allegation. Material corrections should update the same public record and preserve the reason for change.
Phase 1 boundary
What this release does—and does not—authorise
The release is deliberately narrower than the eventual transparency programme.
Published now
- current legal and governance status;
- Gil Marer’s founder role and related-matter interest;
- P0–P3 historical-name rule and link to the immutable register;
- evidence, correction, AI and protected-information rules;
- funding and additional current roles marked under verification.
Not authorised by Phase 1
- new public actor profiles or unreviewed names;
- private-source identities or locators;
- unverified funding figures or current roles;
- a claim that the historical actor census is complete;
- automatic publication, complaints intake or institutional adoption.
Current method status · 13 September 2026
The published operating standard describes source preservation, six checks, temporal context, contrary evidence, human decisions and correction. Founder-related applications remain internal development work. The independent review protocol is prepared and requires wholly fictional cases for its first round. Independent validation, an agreed institutional pilot and adoption remain separate milestones without verified completion in this release.
The formation label remains current. A technical scoping conversation or an invitation to contribute does not establish a partnership, appointment, funding commitment or endorsement.