Skip to content
The Second Pair of Eyes mark Por DerechoInitiative in formation

AI · preventive procedural integrity · human oversight

Generic methodology prototype

The Second
Pair of Eyes

AI asks. Humans decide.

Legal decisions with real consequences deserve a structured second review before the harm becomes difficult or impossible to repair. Por Derecho explores a support layer that does not decide the matter: it tests whether the record, authority, perimeter and consequences have been sufficiently reconciled.

Two abstract eyes and scales: The Second Pair of Eyes

See the whole record

Connect documents, dates, actors, assets and decisions instead of limiting review to the last item cited.

Detect contradictions

Find incompatible versions, missing bridges and later facts that cannot retrospectively justify earlier conduct.

Check before irreversible harm

Raise the scrutiny level when a sale, handover, works, closure, dismissal or economic displacement may be hard to repair.

Stable methodology

Six checks for decisions with integrity

The tool does not label people or decide legality or guilt. It asks verifiable questions and preserves the human response.

SourceWhich document supports the proposition and which version it is.
AuthorityWho could act and under what power at that date.
PerimeterWhich assets, people and proceedings are actually reached.
ContradictionWhich material evidence points in another direction.
ConsequenceWho gains, who loses and which effect becomes embedded.
ReversibilityWhether a later remedy could genuinely repair the harm.

Three symbols · three functions

Method, record review and evidential pulse

The visual grammar now has three jobs: identify the method, mark a concrete documentary check, and show when the underlying evidence has been actively re-tested.

The Second Pair of Eyes master mark

Master mark

Two eyes + scales. Used on methodology, education, research and oversight pages.

Record Review marker

Micro-marker

Document + eye. Placed beside a sentence, source or point requiring concrete reconciliation.

The Pulse source-contact mark

The Pulse

Finger + pulse point. A source-contact status mark: touch the primary record, date the check, test dependencies and show what remains open. Open The Pulse →

Example: this marker does not mean that a breach exists. It means that source, authority, perimeter, contradiction, consequence or reversibility require an identifiable second check.

Two generic experiences

Demonstrate before applying

The public demonstrators use fictional records. Existing founder-related experiments inform development; the first independent review will use wholly fictional records and must precede any proposed institutional use of a real matter. Internal work is not independent validation.

Demonstrator 01

Mixed ownership in a liquidation

A proposed sale maximises value, but part of the property may belong to a third party. The review identifies the missing legal bridge and leaves the decision to the professional.

Explore the synthetic case →

Demonstrator 02

Oversight of oversight

A question travels through judicial, prosecutorial and professional routes. The review shows what each level received, decided and left unanswered.

Explore the oversight layers →

Research and education

A specialism, not a day-one alternative for “everything”

The initial proposition focuses on AI, procedural integrity and oversight of high-responsibility decisions—not replacing schools of legal practice or general programmes.

Universities

Research, clinics, microcredentials, postgraduate work and independent evaluation.

Professional schools

Specialist modules that can integrate into existing accredited education.

Professionals

Simulations for insolvency practitioners, judges, prosecutors, court officials, lawyers, experts and supervisors.

Responsible technology

Provenance, privacy, explainability, bias, false positives and auditability.

Canary Islands as a pilot environment · national vocation

Build it through independent criticism

Por Derecho seeks reserved conversations with university departments, schools of legal practice and specialists in insolvency, economic crime, property, procedure, public administration and responsible AI systems.

Initiative in formation · 13 September 2026

Work you can inspect and help improve

The founder-related work, independent testing and future institutional use each have a separate status.

See the present limits

Por Derecho is founder-led and in formation. Interests, proposed governance and unverified milestones are disclosed.

Read the transparency record →