See the whole record
Connect documents, dates, actors, assets and decisions instead of limiting review to the last item cited.
AI · preventive procedural integrity · human oversight
Generic methodology prototypeAI asks. Humans decide.
Legal decisions with real consequences deserve a structured second review before the harm becomes difficult or impossible to repair. Por Derecho explores a support layer that does not decide the matter: it tests whether the record, authority, perimeter and consequences have been sufficiently reconciled.
Connect documents, dates, actors, assets and decisions instead of limiting review to the last item cited.
Find incompatible versions, missing bridges and later facts that cannot retrospectively justify earlier conduct.
Raise the scrutiny level when a sale, handover, works, closure, dismissal or economic displacement may be hard to repair.
Stable methodology
The tool does not label people or decide legality or guilt. It asks verifiable questions and preserves the human response.
Three symbols · three functions
The visual grammar now has three jobs: identify the method, mark a concrete documentary check, and show when the underlying evidence has been actively re-tested.
Two eyes + scales. Used on methodology, education, research and oversight pages.
Document + eye. Placed beside a sentence, source or point requiring concrete reconciliation.
Finger + pulse point. A source-contact status mark: touch the primary record, date the check, test dependencies and show what remains open. Open The Pulse →
Example: this marker does not mean that a breach exists. It means that source, authority, perimeter, contradiction, consequence or reversibility require an identifiable second check.
Two generic experiences
The public demonstrators use fictional records. Existing founder-related experiments inform development; the first independent review will use wholly fictional records and must precede any proposed institutional use of a real matter. Internal work is not independent validation.
Demonstrator 01
A proposed sale maximises value, but part of the property may belong to a third party. The review identifies the missing legal bridge and leaves the decision to the professional.
Demonstrator 02
A question travels through judicial, prosecutorial and professional routes. The review shows what each level received, decided and left unanswered.
Research and education
The initial proposition focuses on AI, procedural integrity and oversight of high-responsibility decisions—not replacing schools of legal practice or general programmes.
Research, clinics, microcredentials, postgraduate work and independent evaluation.
Specialist modules that can integrate into existing accredited education.
Simulations for insolvency practitioners, judges, prosecutors, court officials, lawyers, experts and supervisors.
Provenance, privacy, explainability, bias, false positives and auditability.
Canary Islands as a pilot environment · national vocation
Por Derecho seeks reserved conversations with university departments, schools of legal practice and specialists in insolvency, economic crime, property, procedure, public administration and responsible AI systems.
Initiative in formation · 13 September 2026
The founder-related work, independent testing and future institutional use each have a separate status.
Six questions, preserved sources, contrary evidence and a recorded human decision.
The first independent round is wholly fictional. The protocol is prepared; independent results are not yet established.
Por Derecho is founder-led and in formation. Interests, proposed governance and unverified milestones are disclosed.