From design to verifiable commissions
Packages prepared · responsibilities not assumedPreparing is not appointing. Sending is not engaging. Constituting is not registering.
Por Derecho has converted its Foundation architecture into four defined assignments: legal formation, independent governance recruitment, adversarial synthetic review and conservation of San Bernardo. This page shows what the documents permit us to say and what still depends on external professionals, consent and legally effective acts.
Four defined assignments
Each pack contains scope, exclusions, deliverables and a stop gate. None replaces written acceptance by the competent professional.
An instruction to decide Canary competence, denomination, founders, purposes, dotation, Board, conflicts, notarial/registration route, taxation and annual compliance.
A competence matrix, exclusion criteria, conflict declaration, interview and informed-acceptance process for people capable of correcting or stopping the promoters.
An adversarial commission using Case Prism, without Sun Park, ICALPA or an anonymised real matter. Reviewers may require redesign or conclude “do not deploy”.
An RFP for a conservation architect, beginning with a documentary stage and a proposal for a lawful, non-intrusive, authorised survey.
90-day programme
The timetable does not promise a formation date. It orders dependencies so that no public step overtakes its evidence.
Send the legal instruction, fix competence and name, decide the dotation route, prepare conflicts, freeze Case Prism and confirm the property channel.
Obtain the first legal view, begin governance conversations, clear reviewer conflicts and identify conservation profiles without approaching the property outside the channel.
Prepare statutes and deed, financial model, candidate declarations, synthetic commission and—only where appropriate—the architect’s documentary inception.
Decide whether to constitute, redesign or pause; receive the red-team outcome; formalise acceptances; and decide whether sufficient authority exists for a building survey.
Public-truth matrix
A public update is produced by a document—not optimism, a conversation or internal preparation.
Current: initiative in formation; instruction pack prepared.
Not proved: deed, registration, legal personality, final NIF or tax regime.
Current: profiles, conflicts and process prepared.
Not proved: candidates, acceptance, appointment or independent majority.
Current: red-team protocol prepared; Case Prism in internal validation.
Not proved: safety, usefulness, external validation or deployment fitness.
Current: experimental founder-related applications.
Not proved: ICALPA adoption, endorsement, authorised pilot or disciplinary conclusion.
Current: possible future home; preservation brief and RFP prepared.
Not proved: acquisition, access, condition, compatibility, project or permission.
Current: invitation models and send gates.
Not proved: university, professional body, reviewer, trustee or institutional partner.
Three states that must not be merged
Institutional maturity depends on preserving the separation.
A usable, versioned and safeguarded pack exists. It may not yet have been sent.
An external person has accepted a defined scope, conflicts and responsibility in writing.
The required act has occurred: appointment, deed, registration, contract, authorisation or completed report.
Boundary with the live matter
The promoters’ experience may generate research questions. Independent governance, synthetic testing and sources must be able to change, clear or close them. No formation step adds evidential weight to a Sun Park allegation.
