SP-ACTA-2012-08-10 · 2012-08-10
10 August 2012 · contested LPB/Gil meeting
Aweswell/LPB · Gil-led · contested
B Project · Multimatrix/LPB → Aweswell/LPB–GilProject-side succession. The label does not attribute acts to Gil before his documented entry.
Capacity and attributed sequence
Separate mandates; visible transitions.
Sequence attributed by Gil Marer and the project's documentary classification. Every person, company, office, representation and act remains separate and must be proved source by source. It is not an adjudicated finding of conspiracy, fraud, criminal purpose, liability or guilt.
Read the Spanish version of the chair's previously prepared statement.
10-Aug-2012 minutes, source page 3 of 4; separate statement located.fmmm-cogolludo-pamanil-counterparty-overlap · FMMM_COGOLLUDO_PAMANIL
Identity control: Patricia Isabel Domínguez Montelongo and Laura Patricia Acosta Matos are different people; 'Patricia' is never used to merge them. Inference boundary: Reading the statement does not by itself prove representation of LPB, CEXP, the Community, Aweswell or Pink Canary Services, or authorship or adoption of its content.
Authorship and documentary control
Calling, chairing, drafting and custody are not the same function.
B · LPB project → Aweswell/LPB · Gil and PatriciaB1 · Documentary project-side succession. B0 identifies Multimatrix/LPB before Gil and Patricia's documented entry; B1 identifies the Aweswell/LPB phase. No B0 act is attributed personally to Gil or Patricia.
Rule: Attendance, representation, finance, later benefit or signature does not by itself make a person the convener, chair, author or custodian.
Who called or generated the record
The copy records the chair explaining resumed functions; the closing signature block identifies LPB and Gil Marer. Attending opponents called the notice unlawful.
Classification basis
A meeting in the LPB/Gil lane after Monterecco Sun Park Limited (later Aweswell) acquired LPB. The copy says no resolution was put to a vote and preserves the adverse objection.
Open public redacted textText-edition PDFRedacted source facsimileIntegrity manifestProvenanceRedaction logMachine continuity indexSource and communications register
Boundary: Four-page DOCX minutes located in three email chains. They state that no resolution was put to a vote; the president's statement and announced objection annex remain unlocated.
Document family
Every notice, ACTA, annex, circulation, implementation and reliance keeps its own ID.
An entry does not turn an email into minutes or receipt into authority, validity or intent.
SP-EVT-2012-02-01-CEXP-MONTERECCO-NOTICE
2012-02-01 · signed-stamped-notice
- Issuer / sender
- CEXP
- Capacity
- purported operating-body issuer; competent authority still to be proved
- Recipients
- Monterecco/Pink-side recipient identified in the notice; complete service chain open
- Body / convener
- CEXP-related, not the Owners' Community · not applicable
- Provenance
- signed/stamped primary notice located
- Public / private
- private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- competent authority, full notice chain, finca scope and later reversal/termination remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2012-02-06-LPB-MONTERECCO-CONTRACT
2012-02-06 · contract
- Issuer / sender
- LPB and Monterecco counterparties
- Capacity
- contracting legal persons; each signatory capacity requires the executed original
- Recipients
- contracting counterparties
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- contract source family located; executed original/schedules incomplete
- Public / private
- private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- executed original, schedules, authority, indivisibility, restitution and complete litigation chain remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2012-03-15-GARRIGUES-TRANSMISSION
2012-03-15 · email-transmission-of-historic-actas
- Issuer / sender
- project-side sender; identity withheld in this public ledger
- Capacity
- sender in project/legal-advice workstream; exact engagement capacity private
- Recipients
- Garrigues legal advisers; exact individuals withheld
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- direct contemporaneous email and attachments located
- Public / private
- private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- native headers, attachment hashes, engagement scope and privilege review remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2012-COMMUNITY-STATEMENT
2012 · statement-and-circulation
- Issuer / sender
- LPB/Gil-side author/sender; exact author and sender chain unresolved
- Capacity
- party-side account; no Community mandate inferred
- Recipients
- intended meeting/circulation recipients; exact list not located
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community context · not applicable
- Provenance
- contemporaneous statement and circulation sources located
- Public / private
- private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- exact event date, official act, sender, recipients, attachments, privacy and privilege status remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2012-08-10-OWNERS-MEETING
2012-08-10 · acta
- Issuer / sender
- Owners' Community record signed in the LPB/Gil perimeter
- Capacity
- Meeting body/LPB representative; opponents disputed authority
- Recipients
- Participants/owners; complete service and attendance lists have not been located
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community · The resumed-chair account and LPB/Gil signatures are recorded; the notice was challenged
- Provenance
- Four-page native DOCX control copy publicly digitised; separate president's statement located
- Public / private
- Private native/public-safe metadata or redacted derivative
- Open issues
- Notice, attendance, the unlocated written objection, implementation and official-book comparison remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-EVT-2012-2014-JV1260-AP89
2012–2014 · judicial-proceeding-records
- Issuer / sender
- competent first-instance and appeal court(s)
- Capacity
- judicial bodies in period-specific possession/operation dispute
- Recipients
- 18 claimant units/parties; complete service denominator not located
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- appeal source located; certified complete first-instance/appeal package incomplete
- Public / private
- public judicial derivative/private native sources
- Open issues
- certified complete record, new-evidence package and precise source-by-source reliance remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-REL-2012-2014-JV1260
2012–2014 · judicial-reliance-record
- Issuer / sender
- JV 1260/AP 89/2014 judicial bodies
- Capacity
- judicial bodies in period-specific dispute
- Recipients
- 18 claimant units/parties
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- judicial source located; complete certified record incomplete
- Public / private
- mixed public/private judicial records
- Open issues
- complete certified record and exact source-by-source reliance remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-REL-2015-S268
2015 · judgment-reliance-record
- Issuer / sender
- court issuing Sentencia 268/2015
- Capacity
- judicial body in contract/operation dispute
- Recipients
- procedural parties
- Body / convener
- not a meeting body · not applicable
- Provenance
- judgment source located; complete litigation chain incomplete
- Public / private
- mixed public/private judicial records
- Open issues
- complete pleadings, evidence, judgment certification, appeals and preclusion analysis remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-CEXP-NOTICE-2012-02-01
2012-02-01 · signed-stamped-cexp-notice
- Issuer / sender
- CEXP
- Capacity
- purported notice issuer; competent authority open
- Recipients
- Monterecco-side recipient; complete service chain private/incomplete
- Body / convener
- CEXP context · not applicable
- Provenance
- signed/stamped primary notice located
- Public / private
- private preserved source/variant; public-safe metadata and relationship only unless included in the linked control-copy package
- Open issues
- competent authority, service, scope, reversal/termination and integrity fields open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-ACTA-2012-08-10
2012-08-10 · source-copy-of-acta
- Issuer / sender
- Owners' Community in a contested governance setting
- Capacity
- Meeting body or recorded event; individual capacities remain source-specific
- Recipients
- Historical recipients/participants as separately recorded; complete original recipient/service denominator unresolved
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community in a contested governance setting · Resumed chair functions and LPB/Gil signatures are recorded; opponents challenged the notice
- Provenance
- Located native four-page DOCX ACTA
- Public / private
- Private native/control source; public irreversible redacted raster facsimile, source-page gallery, OCR text edition and text-edition PDF available through the linked event page
- Open issues
- Notice, attendance, the unlocated written objection, circulation, authenticity and official-book comparison remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-STATEMENT-2012-08-10-5P
2012-08-10 · five-page-president-statement
- Issuer / sender
- President/chair as attributed by the document; exact identity/capacity must be checked against the source
- Capacity
- President's statement related to the 10-Aug-2012 meeting; it is not the ACTA or the written objection
- Recipients
- Meeting participants/recipients according to the source; complete distribution list not located
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community in a contested governance setting · Resumed chair functions and LPB/Gil signatures are recorded; opponents challenged the notice
- Provenance
- Standalone five-page source located and copy included in protocol 422B, pp. 66–70
- Public / private
- Private preserved source/public metadata; privacy review and controlled derivatives pending
- Open issues
- Exact author identity/capacity, original distribution, authenticity and relationship to the unlocated written objection remain open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
SP-SRC-OBJECTION-2012-08-10
unresolved · referenced-written-objection-unlocated
- Issuer / sender
- Not located/not established; the available reference does not identify an author or sender
- Capacity
- Referenced written objection; no signatory, representation or capacity is established
- Recipients
- Not located/not established; the ACTA reference does not prove recipients, delivery or receipt
- Body / convener
- Related to the 10-Aug-2012 Owners' Community meeting in a contested governance setting · Not applicable to the unlocated writing; the meeting convener does not establish its author or sender
- Provenance
- UNLOCATED/OPEN: the located 10-Aug-2012 ACTA references the writing, but no source copy has been located in the finite reviewed universe
- Public / private
- Public missing-source record; no native, source content or derivative is available to publish
- Open issues
- Its own date/range, existence and form of any original copy, author/sender, capacity, recipients, contents, delivery, receipt, authenticity and effect remain open
- Page / reason
- No complete public source page, facsimile, OCR or transcription can be produced without a located copy; doing so would require inventing contents, authorship, recipients or integrity
- Relationships
SP-SRC-PROXY-2012-08-10-1P
2012-08-09–2012-08-10 · proxy-or-representation-instrument
- Issuer / sender
- grantor protected in source custody
- Capacity
- proxy grantor; scope source-specific
- Recipients
- proxy holder/meeting body; identities minimized
- Body / convener
- Owners' Community in a contested governance setting · Resumed chair functions and LPB/Gil signatures recorded; opponents challenged the notice.
- Provenance
- located one-page proxy associated with notice
- Public / private
- private preserved source/variant; public-safe metadata and relationship only unless included in the linked control-copy package
- Open issues
- identity/scope, delivery, acceptance, voting use and full proxy denominator open
- Page / reason
- The canonical entry or linked secondary appearance avoids duplicating a standalone route and keeps provenance, public/private state and relationships within the event document families.
- Relationships
Event-by-event audit
What happened, what was communicated and what remains open.
Occurrence, authority, quorum, voting, validity, implementation, knowledge, intent, causation and legal characterisation remain separate.
| Before | CEXP/Monterecco notice, the LPB–Monterecco contract, historic ACTA transmission and an LPB/Gil-side statement precede the meeting. |
|---|---|
| Knowledge | The pre-meeting material proves awareness in some project/adviser channels, not universal notice or knowledge. |
| Notice and service | A July precursor and notice are referenced but the complete notice, recipients and service proofs are not located. |
| Omitted / excluded allegation | Complete attendance/omission and owner/coefficient evidence is missing. |
| Convener | The record describes resumed chair functions and closes with LPB/Gil signatures; opponents challenged the notice as unlawful. |
| Body | Owners' Community meeting in a contested governance setting. |
| Attendance and representation | Attendance is only partially evidenced; proxies, coefficients and capacities remain open. |
| Proposals and voting | The ACTA records discussion and expressly records that no resolution was put to a vote. |
| Objections and reservations | The five-page president's statement is located as a standalone source and in 422B, pp. 66–70; the referenced written objection remains unlocated; the recorded illegality objection is preserved |
| Minutes and versions | Four-page native DOCX ACTA digitised; the five-page president's statement and one-page proxy are separate documents. The statement reappears in 422B, pp. 66–70 |
| Circulation, receipt or withholding | A later custody/circulation chain exists, but complete original distribution, receipt and withholding evidence is absent. |
| Implementation or non-implementation | Because no resolution was recorded as voted, any alleged implementation requires an independent authority and act-by-act chain. |
| Later reliance | JV 1260/AP 89/2014 and later contract/operation disputes supply adverse period-specific reasoning. |
| Contradictory evidence | The contemporaneous project-side account contains material adverse evidence to a later total-nullity theory; it does not adjudicate the issue. |
| Unproved | Notice legality, attendance, the unlocated written objection, authority, authenticity, validity, implementation and complete judicial reliance remain open |
Public redacted source text
Page-sequenced OCR with visible redactions.
This is not an expert transcription or line-by-line certification. Markers preserve withheld or illegible material; an OCR spelling incompatible with a controlled legal entity is normalised and marked.
# ACTA - 2012-08-10
**Digitalización pública redactada, OCR-asistida y secuenciada por cada página de la copia localizada.**
- ID: `SP-ACTA-2012-08-10`
- Fecha atribuida: `2012-08-10`
- Órgano: Comunidad de Propietarios
- Fuente de control: `ACTA nativa DOCX de cuatro páginas`
- Páginas fuente: 4
- SHA-256 de la fuente privada: `b978bd03ca4a8138f9d1a704cb4717f9cbfb1a090632b6f7dbb33c25b9c4871d`
- Estado: copia localizada digitalizada y publicada con redacciones irreversibles
## Advertencia de uso
No es el original, el libro diligenciado, una copia certificada ni una transcripción pericial. El texto cubre secuencialmente todas las páginas de la copia de control, pero el OCR no ha sido certificado línea por línea. Los datos personales, firmas, domicilios, contactos, identificadores, cuentas, tablas por propietario/finca/deuda/voto y anexos reservados se sustituyen por marcadores expresos.
**Control de variante:** ACTA DOCX de cuatro páginas localizada en tres cadenas de correo. Consigna que no se sometió ningún acuerdo a votación; siguen sin localizarse el escrito del presidente y la objeción anunciados como anexos.
## Página fuente 1 de 4
1
ACTA JUNTA GENERAL ORDINARIA DE LA
COMUNIDAD DE PROPIETARIOS SUN PARK
10 de agosto de 2012
[LÍNEA CON IDENTIFICADOR, CONTACTO, DOMICILIO O FINCA REDACTADA]
municipal de Yaiza, Lanzarote, siendo las 13’00 horas se reúnen en segunda
convocatoria los propietarios de los apartamentos y locales, presentes o
representados que posteriormente se relacionan para la celebración de la Junta
General Ordinaria de la Comunidad de Propietarios del complejo Sun Park para tratar
los siguientes puntos del orden del día:
1º.- Explicación del Sr. Presidente de la reanudación del ejercicio de sus
[FILA INDIVIDUAL FINANCIERA O DE VOTO REDACTADA]
Juzgado de Primera Instancia número 5 de Arrecife.
2º.- Explicación de la situación con los suministros de agua y luz en el inmueble.
3º.- Aprobación de derramas por importes de 24.000 euros. Acuerdos a
adoptar.
[LISTA NOMINAL DE ASISTENTES, REPRESENTACIONES, FINCAS Y COEFICIENTES REDACTADA]
## Página fuente 2 de 4
[PÁGINA PÚBLICA ÍNTEGRAMENTE REDACTADA. La página fuente 2 de 4 permanece contabilizada y preservada privadamente. Contiene una relación nominal, datos por propietario/finca/deuda/voto, datos bancarios, firmas o un anexo reservado que no puede publicarse con seguridad.]
## Página fuente 3 de 4
3
A continuación pide la palabra don Agustín Calzada Molina, representante de
las entidades Amenem, S.L. y Tengolf, S.L. quien plantea la cuestión de que la presente
Junta es ilegal y carece de validez por las razones que expone un escrito que presenta y
se adjunta a la presente acta y pasa a formar parte integrante de la misma, al tiempo
que anuncia que se reserva el ejercicio de acciones legales para impugnar los acuerdos
que pretendan aprobarse en esta Junta.
Abierta la sesión por el Sr. Presidente se procedió a tratar los puntos del orden
del día de la convocatoria.
Por decisión del Presidente todos los asuntos del orden del día van a ser
tratados de forma conjunta en un uno solo punto.
Toma la palabra el Sr. Presidente que hace una lectura en inglés de un escrito
redactado con anterioridad a esta reunión y cuya versión en español es leída a
continuación por doña Patricia Isabel Domínguez Montelongo y que se incorpora a la
presente acta pasando a formar parte de la misma. En el referido escrito el Sr.
Presidente da su opinión sobre la situación y los problemas que afectan a la
Comunidad de Propietarios.
A continuación interviene don Agustín Calzada quien rebate todos los puntos
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
Toma la palabra doña Ana Jiménez Lort y plantea la pregunta de si Luchy Playa
Blanca, S.L. estaría dispuesta a que la Comunidad la gestionaran la mayoría de los
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
acudir a los Juzgados para recuperar la Presidencia de la Comunidad y que su
compromiso es absoluto con la Comunidad de Propietarios.
Doña Christine Hillary quien pregunta cuánto tiempo va a durar la situación del
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
decisión de la Comunidad de Propietarios.
El Sr. Hillary dice que ha pagado una parte de la factura de la electricidad por
cuenta de la Comunidad de Explotación que es la titular de la línea.
La Sra. Asunción quien informa que ha remitido un burofax con anterioridad a
la Junta para hacer constar que la convocatoria de la Junta es ilegal y que se tenía que
haber convocado una reunión informativa en lugar de una Junta Ordinaria. En segundo
lugar, comenta que existen unos Estatutos de la Comunidad de Propietarios que están
vigentes a excepción del apartado que hace referencia a la explotación de los
apartamentos. En la Junta de mayo de 2008 se aprobó un presupuesto para el
mantenimiento de las zonas comunes con una cuota de 88 euros que debía ser
[BLOQUE NOMINAL/IDENTIFICATIVO REDACTADO]
Comunidad de Propietarios. En esa Junta Luchy se compromete a hacer dos pagos, al
administrador de la Comunidad y a la entidad de conservación de Costa Papagayo pero
Luchy tampoco paga. En las siguientes Juntas, Luchy Playa Blanca, S.L. como
propietario permitió que votaran los propietarios cuyos apartamentos estaban siendo
## Página fuente 4 de 4
4
explotados por la entidad Luchy. Sin embargo, en mayo de 2009 se celebra una Junta
en la que se propone aumentar la cuota de la comunidad de 88 euros a 171,81 euros y
en esta Junta se les niega el derecho de voto a los propietarios cuyos apartamentos
estaban siendo explotados por Luchy Playa Blanca, S.L. y que Luchy se negaba a
devolver las llaves de los apartamentos a sus propietarios.
Toma la palabra don Francisco Molina para exponer que sus apartamentos
estaban siendo explotados por Luchy Playa Blanca, S.L. y que esta entidad le debe
dinero.
Al finalizar las intervenciones, no se somete a votación la aprobación de ningún
acuerdo. El Sr. Presidente propone convocar una nueva Junta e invita a los propietarios
[LÍNEA CON IDENTIFICADOR, CONTACTO, DOMICILIO O FINCA REDACTADA]
incorporen al orden del día.
Y no habiendo más asuntos que tratar, siendo las 15’00 horas del día indicado
al principio, el Sr. Presidente dio por terminada la sesión.
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
[BLOQUE DE FIRMA REDACTADO]
Luchy Playa Blanca, S.L. Álvaro Campanario Hernández
Gil Marer
4 source pages
Every page of the current public redacted source PDF
The complete public facsimile is available below and in the dedicated PDF viewer. This recovered reader uses the current reviewed public PDF; separate historical JPEG previews are not published. The source-language transcript above remains available, subject to its stated OCR and source limitations.
Open full PDF viewer · Open / download current public PDF
SHA-256: 7312fc13523c598ff5188d1f12bbd031e4cc4cf2d8daa2fda2901a555a1e7169
Direct page links
Related actors and entities
The link identifies an event-specific documentary relationship or an expressly labelled succession/context route. It does not by itself prove mandate, convocation, control, joint conduct, validity or guilt.
Continuity