PROCEDURAL SEPARATION CONTROL
DP 1901/2026
This English gateway exists so the unitary reader journey does not incorrectly substitute another Fiscalía or criminal-procedure route for DP 1901/2026. The detailed controlled documentary dossier is currently maintained in Spanish.
Boundary
DP 1901/2026, DIP 2/2026 and DP 1956/2026 must remain separate procedural references unless a primary judicial or prosecutorial record expressly connects them for a defined purpose. This page does not create a new merits finding, translate the complete Spanish dossier or alter its latest source-controlled procedural status.
The purpose is narrower: preserve correct routing in English and prevent a reader from treating a nearby procedural file as an equivalent or substitute.
Verified procedural status
A primary order dated 12 July 2026, NIG 3501643220260016977, transferred the matter to the Public Prosecution Service for five days to report on admission, expressly in connection with DIP 2/2026. That proves the judicial transfer and the limited purpose of the requested report. It does not prove final admission, established facts, guilt, coordination or liability.
The signed prosecution report, the corpus supplied to its author and the later judicial order have not been located in the reviewed record. Their absence from that corpus does not prove that they do not exist. No outcome is published until those primary sources are incorporated.
ADVERSE POSTURE · FULL EXPRESS NOTICE
Fiscalía is no longer treated as a neutral recipient of this complaint.
Gil Marer and Aweswell Limited's attributed position: in light of the 2019 Fiscal opinion, the 2023 hearing and later handling, the Public Prosecution Service—especially the Canary Islands/Las Palmas offices—is treated as an adverse institutional actor for preservation, notice and recovery. Gil alleges that any informed act which suppresses, fragments, reclassifies, neutralises or leaves uninvestigated the actor-specific economic crimes alleged in DP 1901/2026 may actively enable the scheme, protect its alleged beneficiaries and contribute to continuing patrimonial harm.
This position does not establish the guilt, knowledge, coordination or responsibility of any prosecutor or office. It makes the signed report requested on 12 July 2026, its author and source corpus essential, and requires act, duty, knowledge, causation, lawful explanation and effect to be tested.
Publication of this notice is not proof of formal service, incorporation into the file or personal reading.
A finite extra-insolvency test
The controlled question is whether the electronic court and insolvency records can reconstruct, item by item, the chain request → decision → certification → notice → delivery → external use for the relevant testimony and identify the actor, asset, date, conduct and legal authority involved. That permits distinct modules—Matkator property, Community governance, access/works, operation/income, professional or financing/public-funds issues—to be tested without treating physical or economic proximity to LPB as proof that each module belongs to its insolvency estate.
This classification is a research control, not a merits finding. A module belongs in DP 1901/2026 only where a primary source connects it to the complaint or court file. Related events are not automatically identical events; silence, referral and adverse outcomes do not prove coordination, obstruction, prevarication or criminality.
Corrected Administrator interface
DP 1901/2026 is principally a private-actor/CAM route. It is not the Insolvency Administrator complaint presented on 18 June 2026 and associated in controlled intake material with handwritten daily reference 22. The 9 July addition belongs to the private-actor lane. DP 1901 material enters Administrator analysis only through an explicit authority, knowledge, capacity, act/omission, consequence or benefit bridge.
Open the controlling removal, remuneration and complaint record →
Named judicial officers · identity layer
Luis Francisco Galván Mesa^ signed the located 12 July 2026 order. The underlying documentary chain also names LAJs Eduardo José Rebollo Sanz^, Águeda Reyes Almeida^ and María Teresa Oliver Guerra^.
^ verifies identity only; each act remains limited to its own signed source, date and capacity.
CAEPR IDENTITY · DP 1901/2026 BOUNDARY
Ricardo de Mosteyrín Sampalo^
No signed prosecution report or primary source has been located attributing an act in DP 1901/2026 to Ricardo de Mosteyrín Sampalo. The link preserves continuity from the 2019 classification opinion and RPL 2523/2025 without converting institutional context into personal attribution.
^ verifies identity only. Open the prosecution, judge, LAJ, notarial and Registry census →