CaixaBank documents

Located claim copy is dated 13 October 2023; initiating receipt records transmission on 11 October 2023. Its native hash differs from the receipt-listed principal. Creditor standing and relief remain claimant assertions.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-f44121b7ac9026d2

Filing records

FVAL-AWESWELL-20231011-CLAIM-COPY

SHA-256 · original

f44121b7ac9026d2478d82974641c9da11fe497aacd999188ada3d495fe34a77

SHA-256 · public copy

989971300339303fcc362765c1591907f58472dbd198164e82ee7c14594cbd8c

The defence principal and eleven companion payloads match the 25 January 2024 receipt exactly. Standing, res judicata, expiry/prescription, waiver and quantum arguments remain defendant submissions, not judicial findings.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-abbaf13c65505863

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

abbaf13c655058635fbd37395ad2e8699c1c91918b6ef75c8a07b90b9b97b73b

SHA-256 · public copy

62416d456fa285c7a0b6e99abda01b18f1b64873a9c27d4d0380d21e43343bbf

Latest native relisting located in this finite scan: 28 January 2027 at 10:00. No later signed relisting located; source language and NIG control the correction. It does not prove completed service or a future hearing outcome.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-e87dacfd8214fd18

Filing records

FVAL-JPI27-20251106-TRIAL-RELISTED

SHA-256 · original

e87dacfd8214fd18860571112b490b27eb0bbcfd077e42eb3d6028dbbddc9103

SHA-256 · public copy

bd41276ccf6099d260799e64b8fa6b0bc3349f1522d816de1e6295c7c01c0c53

The order extends liquidation for one year and records anticipated bank litigation as part of its reasons. It does not adjudicate bank liability or decide later claimant standing.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-368a67fd3d7ea92c

Filing records

F360-JM1-20210224-LIQUIDATION-EXTENSION

SHA-256 · original

368a67fd3d7ea92cf87a418da453313756984ebb883d2128817980c88af40440

SHA-256 · public copy

4fc56335f05b948b18d1d976bab9da2777f494cc7ce2fbafed36f25a1818d166

A separate native scan of the 2008 contract has been preserved. It overlaps in subject matter with defence exhibit 2 but has not been established as the exact filed byte object; signatures and identifiers require review. Read all five pages. Signature fields in this public copy are blank; execution remains unverified.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-f26c548962cdd27d

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

f26c548962cdd27df81133e7833b8efbdc03c702bc4dcd57c4d2074f92fd35e5

SHA-256 · public copy

0f3d03c41959cc7743e17634b214a289dbe36177ca4827f8660df214393325d8

Receipt lists a principal and DOC 0–9. Located principal bytes differ. Assigned predecessor proceeding remains OPEN and is not merged into PO 1859/2023-9.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-9ffed02730568509

Filing records

FVAL-LPB-20230725-RECEIPT

SHA-256 · original

9ffed02730568509aed0ffc3c950408c6b81c5b1f51d3c5a4dfc21e376bed32f

Located LPB claim copy dated 25 July 2023 differs from the principal hash in the receipt. Its allocation header does not establish assignment to PO 1859/2023-9.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-f9580ecc2acbb3fa

Filing records

FVAL-LPB-20230725-CLAIM-COPY

SHA-256 · original

f9580ecc2acbb3fad1b378fbf924851af059d036390b775d1ca185daa24210f1

Private communication preserved in controlled custody. It is not the separate court-filed request dated 25 January 2021. No private body or conditions are published through this record.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-a7e8229f402a3929

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

a7e8229f402a3929289a2212b314253c89c4bc96e630c18e1b1bb0301c3e5d4c

Receipt records 11 October 2023 transmission and a principal plus DOC 0–11. The located 27-page principal is a different native byte object; the complete exact filed annex set remains open.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-a522daa528c345f4

Filing records

FVAL-AWESWELL-20231011-RECEIPT

SHA-256 · original

a522daa528c345f4ef31963e3ded6a674a5376b56bead7495cc837fb013e2312

Expert engagement acceptance, not the final expert report or ratified testimony.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-81c451254f148745

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

81c451254f1487451bc4419f57413b23d58ba08a7e36750c9c1c06f9b738ed5f

Institutional competence note tendered by the defendant. Its date and application to the disputed transactions require source-specific assessment.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-0fc84cb04353eae5

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

0fc84cb04353eae58230350b3a1bc0ce5a8f61af648671f3a8c4d2dea934fe51

The 32-page bundle begins with the Senate official publication dated 7 May 2010. The defendant exhibit label does not establish that the complete bundle is a bespoke Banco de España opinion.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-6b38d907334b1b8a

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

6b38d907334b1b8ada07cfae1a953a7ec8eee576bb0b335174d9538a45069026

Bank settlement records tendered by the defendant. Full statement date span and the contested financial implications are not certified by this intake.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-0ae57307cc5b73bf

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

0ae57307cc5b73bfaac351d808e5c8801881dcd177d3c0fae5bd1e390183652d

Contemporaneous bank proposal tendered by the defendant. Receipt matching proves the transmitted bytes, not the truth or legal effect of the bank assessment.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-a0c21a1cfcf606e9

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

a0c21a1cfcf606e98262979d887c1064dab3387bad2e47f9f96569afd55093a8

Background compilation tendered by the defendant. Corrupt nonempty text required separate OCR; quoted passages and individual attribution still require source-page review.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-1d745593d8954225

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

1d745593d89542258299faf7b6d1655f410a1f26c7e3d65d7da087301b2c30a9

The 2013 AC report is reused as a 2024 defence exhibit. This is a separately hashed payload variant of an already registered report, not independent corroboration or an uncontestable judicial finding.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-a32e2104ff354b71

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE, F360-AC-20130115-REPORT

SHA-256 · original

a32e2104ff354b71cdce49d7df646f08ec7d7d1bb1b6198bdfb81deab9020206

Notarial and contract bundle tendered by the defendant. The composite-copy date is not established in the finite review; identities and financial details require release review.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-7f1f1f7cee029fd6

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

7f1f1f7cee029fd603ea0d339a9f683b84eeaf7b1e65c3c1c30f82d58bbb96ed

Contract tendered by the defendant. Quoted terms require source-image verification; acquisition and receipt matching do not decide the merits.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-fbfce07628c05ef3

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

fbfce07628c05ef334d5ff3b22ec0450bfb9ae45b31db16e2310a755c585a7d3

Power tendered by the defendant. Instrument scope and each professional authority remain act-specific; personal identifiers are not released.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-9b0215030ed8c87c

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

9b0215030ed8c87ca6905c7bc2deaa72cf9b7952d5fa5ab65e3ef6ef1bc5244f

One index plus ten exhibits and the defence principal form twelve exact receipt-matched payloads. The index is not a separate authored merits pleading.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-54e18415f62ec36a

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE

SHA-256 · original

54e18415f62ec36ac20934e18eedc39217560643a25c1b970ff506c3d5a1fdd6

Receipt proves transmission of twelve matching payloads on 25 January 2024. The 29 January carrier date is distinct. Receipt and procedural admission do not decide the merits.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-820d75cdf6114094

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20240125-DEFENCE-RECEIPT

SHA-256 · original

820d75cdf6114094a5a7cba013b17ad711fe98d8daa8413b95903f405fc90498

Records receipt of the answer and defendant appearance and lists the preliminary hearing for 29 October 2024. It does not adjudicate the defence exceptions. Issuing LAJ identity remains source-specific pending canonical resolution.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-bd92e60db9067b15

Filing records

FVAL-JPI27-20240129-DEFENCE-RECEIVED

SHA-256 · original

bd92e60db9067b157d85a4314304b85b11edc6a34d1a3ce1d92b6ee32e70e3f4

Defendant-retained report dated 17 October 2024. The located 96-page report differs from the receipt-listed hash. It is not certified as the exact filed version or as ratified testimony.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-7b4ebc7b9a034317

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20241017-EXPERT-COPY

SHA-256 · original

7b4ebc7b9a03431796e1650581eefa74b5f4672c86191c5e34838401ed0e1fad

Located cover requests admission of the report as document 11 and expert attendance. Its hash differs from the receipt-listed cover; requested attendance is not completed testimony.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-417371f3c39ca296

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20241018-EXPERT-COVER-COPY

SHA-256 · original

417371f3c39ca2967d34882cc0112a5cf5ad545e0a963df94e2254e912c2fda8

Receipt records transmission on 18 October 2024. Both located cover and report differ from its listed hashes; the cause and legal significance of the variants are unresolved.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-f82a42a6e664e746

Filing records

FVAL-CAIXABANK-20241018-EXPERT-RECEIPT

SHA-256 · original

f82a42a6e664e746770ecfa448566509ef6a1dc5703454ba939e743b406e47c4

Bank notice and cover preserved as historical context. Bank-stated amounts are not a court-determined balance; the cover is not completed proof of delivery or an independently matched enforcement debt.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-87b54f597c0b754e

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

87b54f597c0b754e9845aee07c8ed09ef4cf8e7c745cff4a3ef131f618b4dd43

Private counsel report preserved as a separate source. It is not a filed pleading, an assignment order or an adjudicated finding. No advice body is published.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-a281698928501b7e

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

a281698928501b7e4f91fc74b497088bd1a60a2cb2f898444618e0200b992da2

Records an oversized failed attempt followed by a partial two-item transmission on 13 January 2018. It contains only a principal first page; no complete claim, full annex set or assigned case number is established.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-28b1ab5b82864b4f

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

28b1ab5b82864b4f8fc028c48d236a2f238a3d3b65d1b2684ac1faec4b04689d

Private legal opinion retained in controlled custody. This metadata does not publish privileged advice, turn it into a filed pleading or claim a complete semantic review.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-35e0208a639bdec8

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

35e0208a639bdec83da2105eedf1bfae18c5e2dca9386ee89a29e49dc81f7b4b

Earlier private advice addressing several LPB financial and insolvency issues. It is contextual material, not a verified filed pleading or adjudicated finding; its advice body and personal identifiers remain restricted.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-4f7627fc746c21ff

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

4f7627fc746c21ff850f1b41761bb5d883d4dbafc980f9ce719386db8d32e0aa

Private communication preserved to evidence the chronology of proposed bank steps. It is not itself a court order, filed pleading, mandate to new counsel or proof of bank liability.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-94e4ac14e1fd174d

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

94e4ac14e1fd174d1ee0dc3e4dc72792352991d861afde3238f6e5ee801221d4

The deed is relevant to the financing chronology and relationships among the loan, security and swap. Relevance does not establish that every obligation or alleged loss has the same legal cause; personal, account and signature data require review.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-40e000ad23e87769

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

40e000ad23e87769f6956cd5bbb7033dd054d19739fbd15b902a330526b163fc

The deed supplies financing chronology and may inform analysis of the later relationship among facilities and security. It is not proof of mis-selling, causation or quantum; personal, account and signature data require review.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-a8d9dff2941d6173

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

a8d9dff2941d6173097f0dac7410ca60eb4d5327d5ce45414fea4ad75eb7d00e

This report concerns a distinct mortgage floor-clause issue and is included only as related financing context. It is not a swap-loss calculation, a filed expert report in PO 1859/2023-9 or a judicial finding.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-4cc12d8564f82e15

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

4cc12d8564f82e15297982280574937a4505687c9968dee93b5f688e602ad4a9

A separate same-day insolvency order concerns alleged destruction of active-estate property and related evidential requests. It demonstrates a cross-matter procedural connection but does not decide CaixaBank liability, swap loss or claimant standing.

Source

SRC-VAL1859-3b02a944ae5becb1

Filing records

—

SHA-256 · original

3b02a944ae5becb154bdc2109935d060de80bb9e862f10ab055582696e5ee40f