ACTÚA · CAM · JAN–APR 2018 · PRIMARY SOURCES RECOVERED

ACTÚA acknowledges incomplete interior access, an “at least 61” figure supplied by others, and 57.14% depreciation for the functional unit as a whole.

The evidential question is now precise: what representative property-level basis supported a whole-complex condition conclusion and uniform depreciation where ACTÚA did not access 100% of the interior and its own 61-unit figure is expressly presented as information supplied to the valuer?

57.14%

whole-unit depreciation

ACTÚA adopts 20 years physical age and in April expressly defends applying 57.14% to the total functional unit rather than property by property.

61+

“according to information supplied”

ACTÚA records at least 61 unrefurbished units but attributes that figure to information received. Provider and exact property list remain open.

<100%

interior access

ACTÚA states it could not access the interior of 100% of the complex and says overall condition was also inferred from general exterior images.

The 13 photographs correct an earlier hypothesis

The record is mixed: it documents deterioration and three worn apartment interiors, but also usable-looking common areas, people visibly present and an intact-looking reception. Only three images are clear apartment interiors and none is visibly identified by apartment, finca, block, owner or access provider.

Correction: we do not publish that ACTÚA showed only negative Blocks 4–5 images. The issue is now representativeness, access, the source of 61 and extrapolation of uniform depreciation.

60 / 61 / ≈44 must remain separate

60

2017 acquisition/minority reconstruction; exact native source still outstanding.

61+

ACTÚA 3 April: at least 61 unrefurbished units according to information supplied to the valuer.

≈44

GESVALT professional opinion that approximately 44 were poor and the remainder usable.

Blocks 4 + 5 = exactly 44 apartments

The numerical match justifies investigation but does not prove identity. The contemporaneous “two blocks / 61” wording also cannot literally fit Blocks 4+5 as an architectural apartment count.

Formal court transmission documented

LexNET id 201810203877878 establishes that CAM filed its pleading and ACTÚA technical responses to GESVALT on 17/04/2018 at 12:27 in Concurso 36/2012 before Mercantile Court nº1 Las Palmas. This proves transmission and litigation position, not the merits or the causal weight assigned by the insolvency administrator/court.

Open: source/list behind 61, interiors actually inspected, keys/access, geolocation of the three interiors, native source for 60, unit basis for ≈44 and later AC/court treatment.

Open the 262-property forensic map →