Por Derecho

Document reader · 8 September 2026

Documents, submissions and decisions

0 registered acts0 viewable documents

No public document copy is linked from this record. This does not mean that the original does not exist: recovery, custody and public release are verified separately.

Partial coverage: the complete docket and every annex are not certified. A pleading copy does not by itself prove filing; a party report or prosecutorial opinion is not a judicial decision.

The historical record and its relationships are preserved below. Recovered contextual links describe historical navigation; they are not a new determination of a close legal connection.

MASTER PROCEEDINGS · GC-CIV-003 · SOURCE UPDATED 03-SEP-2026

Diligencias Preliminares 1041/2017

Exhibition and complete-copy production of the 20-Oct-2017 credit-assignment deed and its economic terms.

Master IDGC-CIV-003
TypeJUDICIAL_PROCEEDING · TRUE
Originating organJuzgado de Primera Instancia nº 2 de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
NIG3501642120170028407
StatusPrimary judicial acts dated 19-Dec-2017, 12-Jan-2018, 23-Jan-2018 and Decree 000139/2018 dated 05-Mar-2018 are recovered; CAM's primary opposition filing and a contemporaneous 25-Jan-2018 AC communication are also recovered. The complete docket, actual 19-Feb-2018 result, original discontinuance filing and ultimate finality remain incomplete.
Source statusVERIFIED_PRIMARY_COPY · DECREE_RECOVERED · SOURCE_GAPS_REFINED_03SEP2026

Reference and chronology

Reference: 0001041/2017; Auto 19/12/2017; Providencia 12/01/2018; Decree 000139/2018; IUP LR2017147858.

Period: 2017-2018.

Latest dated primary judicial act verified: Decree 000139/2018 dated 05-Mar-2018, electronically signed by LAJ Fernando Pérez Polo on 06-Mar-2018 at 09:51:31.

Appeal/review: the 19-Dec-2017 Auto expressly states its own finality. Decree 000139/2018 was reviewable within five days; ultimate finality is not inferred.

Open documentary gaps

Complete docket/certified index; actual 19-Feb-2018 result and any equivalent disclosure; original discontinuance filing and its author/filer/authority; full CAM filing dated 25-Feb-2018, registry 1222/18; the specific legal basis for the AC's intervention in LPB's representation; service and ultimate finality of Decree 000139/2018.

No longer open: the signed 19-Dec-2017 Auto, its finality, CAM's positive 18-Jan-2018 citation/requerimiento, and Decree 000139/2018 dated 05-Mar-2018. The relationships on this page do not by themselves prove causation, personal coordination or criminal liability.

Canonical connection

LPB v Construcciones Acosta Matos — assignment-document disclosure route.

Current custodian: Juzgado de Primera Instancia nº 2 de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

Primary-source control · 03-Sep-2026

  • 19-Dec-2017 — Auto: grants the diligence; orders complete exhibition/production of the 20-Oct-2017 assignment deed, concrete price, payment date and costs; EUR 100 caución; electronically signed by Juan Avello Formoso and Fernando Pérez Polo. The Auto expressly states its own finality.
  • 12-Jan-2018 — Providencia: schedules exhibition/production for 19-Feb-2018. Scheduling does not prove occurrence or result.
  • 23-Jan-2018 — Diligencia de Ordenación: Fernando Pérez Polo records a positive SCNE result and that CAM was cited/required on 18-Jan-2018.
  • CAM opposition: primary party filing recovered; Gerardo Pérez Almeida, procurador, and Carmen Ramírez de Prada, lawyer.
  • 25-Jan-2018 — contemporaneous AC communication: Francisco de Borja Rodríguez-Batllori Laffitte, acting as insolvency administrator/liquidator, communicates termination of LPB's existing professional relationship with its lawyer, requests venia and instructs that the procurador file no further papers in these proceedings without his express consent. This proves the intervention; it does not by itself prove that the AC drafted or filed the discontinuance or that the termination was legally invalid.
  • 05-Mar-2018 — Decree 000139/2018: recovered primary judicial source. It records that LPB requested discontinuance; that the opposing party did not object and consented through a 25-Feb-2018 filing, registry 1222/18; dismisses the matter under article 20.3 LEC; suspends the then-pending hearing for 25-Apr-2018 at 11:15; and provides for review within five days. Electronically signed by Fernando Pérez Polo on 06-Mar-2018 at 09:51:31.

Open machine-readable source state

Private Drive locators, native emails and native court files are not copied into the public repository; only controlled source facts and boundaries are published.

CRIMINAL-FIRST READING · GIL MARER ALLEGATION

The question is no longer simply “why was the file closed?”

Gil Marer says the issue to investigate is whether the insolvency administrator used his position to assume effective control over LPB's procedural voice and whether that intervention was functional to discontinuing a diligence aimed at obtaining CAM's economic terms for the credit assignment. He presents this as a possible standalone act of criminal instrumentalisation and also as one part of a wider sequence before, during and after the insolvency.

The available evidence proves intervention, sequence and procedural effect. It does not yet prove personal authorship of the discontinuance by the AC, legal invalidity of the representation change/termination, agreement with any identified Acosta Matos individual, criminal intent or deliberate private benefit.

Open the criminal-first digest, actor-specific test and remedies question →

Actor-specific and thematic interconnection

AC intervention and retracto discontinuanceDedicated GC-CIV-003 digest.Francisco de Borja Rodríguez-Batllori LaffitteInsolvency-administrator record.CAM / Acosta Matos · creditor controlPrivate perimeter and identified actors.Possible criminal misuse thesisActor-by-actor framework, causation, damage and benefit.Unitary criminal reverse engineeringNon-fragmented multi-track reading.Concurso 36/2012 classificationLater insolvency, prosecutorial and judicial sequence.

Express procedural relations and backlinks

—

Cross-references in canonical fields

Navigation derived from express mentions of other references inside canonical fields; it is not promoted to a formal procedural relationship.

—

Related proceedings · contextual navigation

Links calculated from shared canonical fields. They help reconstruct the perimeter and discover neighbouring files, but they do not prove joinder, identical parties, a formal procedural connection, shared knowledge, causation or liability.

GC-CIV-030Diligencias Preliminares 459/2024same_geography · same_stream · shared_canonical_terms:exhibition

Navigation: same originating organ

Shared originating organ only; it does not imply a connection between files.

—

← Master Register · Proceeding-page directory