19·12·2017
Holding
Holding
Liquidation opened
Opened LPB's liquidation, suspended its powers over its own property, required a plan within fifteen days and quarterly reports.
Not decided: that all of Sun Park belonged to LPB.
SOURCE · CONTRADICTION · DECISION · GAP
Condition and preservation of the active estate
A source-controlled reconstruction of opening, plan approval, opposition to reported operations, inspection and extension in Insolvency 36/2012. It separates what the court decided from party positions, expert opinion and missing material.
Perimeter: LPB's estate is not the whole mixed-ownership Sun Park complex. The record does not merge LPB, Matkator, CAM or other third-party properties. Private originals, bank data, native email, the confidential report and unprovenanced photographs are not published.
Official sequence
Five acts, five distinct functions
The chronology does not convert authorisation into implementation or a procedural rejection into a finding that an alleged event did not occur. Each card states effect and limit.
16·04·2018
Holding
Holding
Plan approved with qualifications
Approved the proposed dation route for mortgaged properties and a separate EUR 400,000 premises/pools line, with publication and a better-offer window.
Not decided: that any valuation was proved or that later implementation met every condition.
12·05·2020
Holding
Holding
LPB reconsideration
Confirmed the 24-Oct-2019 order and applied res judicata to the 23-Jul-2019 AP interest framework.
Limit: demolition, expert, inspection and access requests were treated as new/out of time in that motion; their truth and responsibility were not decided.
24·02·2021
Holding 001
Holding 001
Inspection and preservation
Partially allowed reconsideration only to replace the reasoning; maintained denial of filing 7,299. The court could not identify ownership of photographed interiors.
Adverse, limited reasoning: it regarded common-area rubble as causing no damage beyond a removable aesthetic effect, did not attribute the start of common-area works to CAM, and found the sale delay not attributable to the court or AC.
Not established: absence of damage throughout the estate, a complete property map or the result of a later responsibility claim.
24·02·2021
Holding 002
Holding 002
Liquidation extension
Granted one further year. It cited known difficulties and expected delay from nullity actions to be brought against Bankia.
Not decided: Bankia liability, the object/success of any action, or any matter called “No-Swap”.
Balanced reading
Assertion, counter-position, observation, holding
This matrix prevents one side's filing from being presented as conclusive proof.
| Node | Aweswell / LPB position | AC / CAM position | Court observation or holding | Open source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Separate sale / EUR 400,000 | The 16-Jan-2019 filing alleged breach of the suspended plan, ob-rem severance and favour to CAM. | The fourth report, as quoted, described a 28-Nov-2018 deed and EUR 400,000 receipt. | The 16-Apr order had authorised that line subject to conditions; the later non-validation record must establish what implementation was valid. | Fourth report, deed 2,150, 12-Dec act, 24-Oct-2019 order, Registry and accounts. |
| Works / condition | Alleged demolition, rubble, deterioration and need for inspection/expert evidence. | CAM said it owned 54 units and had carried out works in some of its own units, as well as Community measures; AC denied handing over possession and cited certificates. | The 24-Feb order could not identify ownership of interiors; treated common-area rubble as a removable aesthetic effect, did not attribute the start of common-area works to CAM, rejected delay attributable to the court/AC and maintained the denial. It did not make a global finding about the whole estate. | Original photos/EXIF, titles, licence, certificates, reports and property-photo overlay. |
| Expert access | The email print purports to record a request for experts to be authorised. | The visible response attributed to AC proposes a videoconference. | No native source, order or outcome here proves authenticity, authorisation, refusal or a completed inspection. | RFC822, attachment, later replies, access record and expert/notarial output. |
| Extension | LPB and Aweswell are recorded as consenting. | AC requested more time. | The court granted one year; reference to Bankia actions is reasoning, not a nullity judgment. | Application, responses, finality, later extensions, Bankia action and closure. |
Editorial decision
What is shown and what remains private
Website / public repository
- The five orders above as redacted substantive text.
- Neutral party-filing cards paired with the counter-position and outcome.
- Judgment 89/2014 on the JV 1260 page, including its adverse 18-unit holding.
- Hashes, page counts, duplicates, variants, limits and gaps.
Excluded from full publication
- Unredacted originals and verification codes.
- 2008 bank receipts exposing account/tax identifiers.
- The confidential, draft, unsigned valuation report.
- Private email beyond a redacted chronology.
- Photographs until originals/EXIF and context are recovered and faces blurred.
Mandatory corrections
Four errors that must not propagate
Aliases and duplicates
- “1240-2011” is exactly the already controlled JV 1260/2011 claim.
- The two 1-Mar-2018 photo PDFs are identical.
- Two CAM prints represent one opposition.
Content and scope
- The two 24-Feb-2021 orders are different decisions.
- “No-Swap” and other filename labels are not holdings.
- The expert draft overreads the 16-Apr order: it did not adopt Actúa's figures.
- “DOC 7 Liquidaciones” is a 2008 bank-receipt exhibit, not an insolvency-liquidation record.
Finite acquisition
Evidence that could still change the reading
Whole-file denominator request. The judicial spine publicly asks the court office/LAJ for the master piece inventory, article 47.3 signed electronic indexes, article 46.2 act relations and the non-electronic exception inventory. Production would permit every gap here to be tested and corrected in both directions.
Complete JV 1260; opening/plan, observations, clarification, publication and finality.
Quarterly report, deed/cheque/Registry and final/methodologically controlled valuations.
PO 213/2015, receipt/treatment of the Feb-2019 Fiscalía filing and parent case for bank receipts.
Extensions, Bankia action, closure and the complete quarterly-report series.
New cross-proceeding trace. See the dedicated dossier on the 36/2012 acts signed by Magistrate-Judge Alberto López Villarrubia of the then Commercial Court No. 1 of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, his 24-Oct-2024 register attribution in Meeting Point 357/2024, the express conflict/injury allegation and the production still required. Open Magistrate López Villarrubia / Meeting Point 357 dossier →
Sun Park / MYND Yaiza — site and canonical record
Hotel / physical site: Sun Park · MYND Yaiza — PD-SP-O-0042.
Calle Janubio 3, Playa Blanca, Lanzarote 35580, Spain. This identifies the establishment and site, not a corporate owner or determination of title. Canonical address and source variants · Actors, proceedings and evidence.
MASTER MYND · photographs, attributed accounts and chronology