Owners, operator and finance
Connect Aweswell's initiative, ONA's operating proposal and successive or parallel funding options with their advisers.
2018–2019 · PROFESSIONAL ROLE · CONTEMPORANEOUS RECORD
Daniel Irigoyen Fujiwara
The lawyer coordinating the owner-led, ONA-backed funded exit: bringing the shareholder, operator and financing routes into a workable insolvency conclusion, while seeking protection for the assets needed to achieve it.
A documented mandate, with distinct capacities
Introduced by ONA, Irigoyen was retained by Aweswell Limited. The signed engagement circulated on 8 June 2018 identifies him as a partner and lawyer at De Pasqual & Marzo Abogados SLP. His work covered coordination with existing advisers, repayment and conclusion of the concurso, and communication with the court and Insolvency Administrator. Preparatory correspondence places his involvement before 7 June. Mandate source ↓
His judicial background is independently documented: the CGPJ's 3 July 2013 decision granted voluntary judicial leave effective 1 September 2013, from Barcelona Commercial Court No. 5. The roster closed on 31 March 2018 lists him among commercial-specialist magistrates on voluntary leave. BORME entry 107678 records his admission as the firm's professional partner on 28 February 2018.
Here he acted as a lawyer. The lender, ONA's operating role, Aweswell's shareholder role and the judicial office remain distinct. The court-appointed Insolvency Administrator was Francisco de Borja Rodríguez-Batllori Laffitte; Irigoyen did not hold that office or preside over this concurso.
Payment and conclusion
Establish the amount, agree the payment process and coordinate security through the steps needed to conclude LPB's concurso.
Protect the underlying assets
Seek access, conservation and court coordination so the assets supporting repayment and operation remain available.
This summarises his documented work. Meetings and recommendations require separate evidence of filing, judicial adoption and implementation.
His work alongside the takeover chronology
Document packages and several funding term sheets are discussed; his mandate is defined and the signed engagement circulated. Exit work already exists when the takeover occurs.
He reports separate meetings with the judge and Administrator, explaining the exit, debt confirmation, payment arrangements and interim protection.
Communications propose coordination between criminal and insolvency proceedings and measures requiring the Administrator to address conservation and access.
He reports telling the judge that finance is approved. His later account records a joint meeting, with the repayment amount unresolved.
He reports warning the Administrator that separate disposal of common elements damages both the repayment exit and future auction prospects.
His separate representation of Clubotel La Dorada is documented in a 3 May pleading. Operating participation, funding and protection remain connected.
Six source anchors
These summaries identify what the recovered records support. Original professional correspondence remains in controlled custody.
SIGNED ENGAGEMENT · 8 JUNE 2018
Aweswell's coordination mandate
The signed retainer identifies the client, professional and work towards full satisfaction of creditors and conclusion of the concurso. Contemporary correspondence records the ONA introduction.
An engagement establishes the mandate; it is not itself a lender's commitment.
PD-DI-SRC-RET-20180608
FIRST-PERSON REPORT · 13 JUNE 2018
Two meetings, a practical sequence
His native communication separates the judge and Administrator meetings and describes the proposed application, debt confirmation, deposit, payment and conclusion.
His contemporaneous account is not a judicial minute. The accompanying drafting outline does not establish filing.
PD-DI-SRC-MTG-20180613
DIRECT COMMUNICATION · 12 SEPTEMBER 2018
Finance reported as approved
He reports telling the judge that finance was approved for payment or consignation of creditors' claims, identifying the need to settle procedure and the exact amount.
This establishes his report of approved finance; fund instruments establish the particular commitment and closing terms.
PD-DI-SRC-MTG-20180912
MEETING REPORT · 26 SEPTEMBER 2018
Debt quantification remained blocked
After an Administrator-office meeting, he records a joint court meeting: the repayment figure remained unresolved while an appeal was pending and agreement with CAM was sought.
Compare this account with the procedural record. It is distinct from the separate June meetings.
PD-DI-SRC-MTG-20180926
DIRECT REPORT · 24 DECEMBER 2018
A warning affecting both routes
He reports warning the Administrator that separate disposal of common elements undermined repayment and future auction prospects, connecting preservation with financing.
His reported warning and assessment are contemporary evidence, not an adjudicated finding of sabotage or causation.
PD-DI-SRC-WARN-20181224
SIGNED PROCEDURAL DOCUMENT · 3 MAY 2019
Clubotel's separate representation
A pleading signed in his full name identifies his representation of Clubotel La Dorada, directly connecting his professional identity with the operator's procedural participation.
Representation, filing, admission and the challenge's outcome are separate propositions.
PD-DI-SRC-REP-20190503
Why this evidence matters
Payment and security required coordination. A mortgage over LPB assets intended after repayment cannot be assessed in isolation from interim security. Read the documented security sequence.
Luchy Playa Blanca, S.L.U. (LPB), its estate, other owners and operating interests must remain distinct. Read the hotel and estate perimeter. Each impediment and counterparty's reason requires examination; these records do not establish one explanation for every financing decision.
Earlier professional-source provenance ledger → · Provide a correction or response →