1103/2018-00 · origin
The 2 May judicial record identifies Diligencias Indeterminadas 1103/2018-00 as the origin assigned after receipt of the complaint on 23 April 2018.
PD-SP-R-0023 · LZ-JUD-003 ↔ LZ-APP-004 · IDENTITY ONLY
One procedural family, four distinct references.
DI 1103/2018-00^ → DP 1132/2018^ → Rollo 1010/2018^ / Order 804/2018^
WHAT EACH NUMBER DOES
DP 1132/2018 · investigation file
The matter continued as Preliminary Proceedings 1132/2018 under NIG 3500443220180003508 before Investigating Court no. 2 of Arrecife, formerly Mixed Court no. 7.
Rollo 1010/2018 · appeal roll
The Provincial Court of Las Palmas, Section Two, registered the appeals from the 20 August provisional dismissal under this roll.
Order 804/2018 · appellate decision
Issued on 13 November 2018, it dismissed both appeals, confirmed the provisional dismissal and stated that no further appeal lay.
Outcome and legal boundary
The appellate result was adverse to the complainants' criminal/possessory framing. It treated the conflict as essentially civil and relied on the insolvency administrator's account and authority. It did not adjudicate civil or tourism operator title, grant CAM a whole-hotel possession order, merge Matkator into LPB, or make all Sun Park property part of Insolvency 36/2012.
What the caret means. Each marker confirms only that the displayed reference has been reconciled to this canonical procedural family. It does not prove an allegation, conduct, knowledge, criminality, title, possession, liability or correctness of the decision.
Context without merger
Insolvency 36/2012 is relevant because the administrator's authority and LPB estate perimeter were relied upon, but it is not the parent of DP 1132. Community-authority, ONA-exit and Matkator/non-estate evidence help test the surrounding facts; none becomes part of this criminal file merely by being linked.
What remains open
The court-certified complete DP docket and appeal roll, the signed/certified 20 August order, the full service and finality chain, native audiovisual masters, and the filing-by-filing counsel/procurador lineage remain incomplete. The four-reference identity is confirmed; the primary-evidence denominator is not complete.