COMPETENCE → KNOWLEDGE → VERIFICATION → DECISION → ACTION

One strong question for each function. No issue should disappear through fragmentation.

Updated rule: received ≠ examined ≠ verified ≠ decided. Different entity ≠ no relationship. RICPE→Orion includes documented finance architecture. ERDF is identified for MYND. Criminal characterization requires more proof; the network does not disappear because of that.

ERDF / FEDER · evidence → traceability → action

ERDF / EU funds: what is established, what remains open and what to do next

How to use this page. Competence map: assign each body a finite question, a native file and a verifiable result.

Por Derecho visual on ERDF traceability and asset recovery
Editorial action-routing aid; it does not establish fraud, corruption, duplicate funding, EU-budget loss, a PIF nexus, EPPO/OLAF competence or individual liability.
✓
Established

The controlled public record identifies the EU/ERDF connection for the MYND/GC/836/P06 project.

?
Still to produce

Exact operation and percentage, eligible expenditure, invoices, payment/certification, verifications, audits, corrections and recovery.

≠
Keep separate

RIC tax relief, RICPE investment, Regional Incentives, State aid and FEDER/ERDF are not one funding source.

Minimum production needed to close the ERDF question
  1. operation identifier and programme/fund
  2. beneficiary and title/availability record
  3. eligible-cost schedule and invoices/supporting records
  4. funding sources and other aid declared
  5. certifications, payments and verified employment
  6. verifications, audits, issues, corrections or recoveries

Directive (EU) 2024/1260 · FEDER/ERDF · EPPO/OLAF: Editorial action-routing aid; it does not establish fraud, corruption, duplicate funding, EU-budget loss, a PIF nexus, EPPO/OLAF competence or individual liability.

Justice / insolvency / supervision

CGPJ / Prosecution / DP1901

What was cumulatively examined and which originals/metadata/title records remain to verify?

LAJ / Judge / Administrator

Can each testimony/external use and each patrimonial/accounting step be reconstructed?

Investment / governance / market

RICPE

JDAM was director before Sun Park 2020. What conflicts, abstentions, DD, approvals and finance followed?

RICPE →

AGM / Orion

How did JDAM, FMMM, Pamalexsha, Shaila and Antonio enter the perimeter; what RICPE finance was executed; what Sun Park value can be traced?

Orion →

Portfolio

It investigated, collected data and examined sources. Which, what conclusion and what authority/action followed?

Portfolio →

CNMV

How do 2021 RICPE supervision, missing July-2021 documents and 2024 Orion consultation connect?

CNMV →

RIC / incentives / ERDF

AEAT + Canary Government · RIC

What beneficiary, investment, title/availability/perimeter and finance facts were verified?

DGF / GC/836/P06 / ERDF

ERDF is identified. What percentage, certified/paid expenditure, control, audit and recovery is recorded?

Property / tourism / private perimeter

CAM / Pamalexsha / HNT / MYND

Who held title, authority, access, governance, finance, works, operation and revenue at each date?

Perimeter →