RECOVERY FIRST · ACCOUNTABILITY IN SERVICE OF RECOVERY

Recover before punishing.

Project Sun Rock coordinates a portfolio of legally separate rights and recovery routes. One common history may affect several companies, operating structures, counterparties and other rights-holders without making them one claimant or placing every matter before one court.

Restitution where possible. Compensation where not. Each claim for its true owner, with its own authority, law, forum, causation and quantum.

Public status · 18 August 2026

The multi-claimant and multi-jurisdiction architecture is active. Identification, standing, authority, limitation and valuation for each third party remain subject to individual review. No aggregate third-party damages figure is published.

The question organising the whole programme

WHAT MUST BE PROVED → CORRECTED → RESTORED → ACCOUNTED FOR → COMPENSATED, AND FOR WHOM?

The work concerning the Insolvency Administrator, the Court, the LAJ/court office, private actors, regulators and public administrations is not a set of autonomous punitive ends. These are different nodes in one patrimonial reconstruction: what belonged to whom, what happened, through which mechanism, what consequence continues, which forum is competent and what remedy remains available.

Seven recovery objectives

1 · Preserve

Protect LPB, its causes of action and recoverable value; keep Matkator and third-party extra-insolvency rights separate where the evidence requires it.

2 · Restore

Recover property, title, possession, access, control, corporate rights and other interests for the correct holder where a lawful route exists.

3 · Reverse effects

Test continuing judicial, documentary, notarial, Registry, administrative and economic consequences of historic acts.

4 · Account

Reconstruct credit, interest, transactions, income, fruits, exploitation, costs and any surplus or displaced value.

5 · Damages

Quantify only causally provable loss: assets, fruits, income, investment value, financing effects and recoverable costs.

6 · Individual causation

Duty/power → verified knowledge → act/omission → implementation → consequence → remedy.

7 · Accountability by proof

Keep judicial remedy, civil/insolvency liability, discipline, inspection and criminal routes separate. None is presumed from another.

One common history does not create one claimant

“Sun Rock Group” describes a historical, economic and strategic reality built around the hotel, its operation, funding, commercialisation and recovery. It is not one legal person. Each entity or rights-holder retains its own assets, contracts, liabilities, causes of action, limitation periods, forum and recoveries.

Verified core

Aweswell, LPB and Matkator

Aweswell pursues its own direct rights as parent, creditor, funder and investor where applicable. LPB retains its estate claims and Matkator its extra-insolvency rights. Group ownership does not automatically move a loss from one company to another.

Associated structures

Explotadora / CEXP / OpCo and others

Their existence, capacity, representation, current control, direct injury and standing must be verified separately before a claim is attributed to or pursued for them.

Independent third parties

Owners, creditors and counterparties

Their rights remain with the person who suffered the loss unless a mandate, assignment, subrogation or another valid basis exists. Commercial proximity or common evidence does not make their claim Aweswell's property.

Public interest

Prosecutors, regulators and administrations

Investigation, sanction, correction, confiscation or recovery of public money belongs to the competent body. Those functions are not Aweswell's private damages claims.

Authority to act for a third party is not presumed

Bases that may permit representation or control

  • written mandate or engagement;
  • valid assignment;
  • subrogation;
  • agency with sufficient authority;
  • joinder, recognised representation or procedural mechanism;
  • standing held by an administrator, liquidator or other office-holder;
  • court permission or another basis under the applicable law.

What may be done while authority is pending

  • preserve and organise the common evidence;
  • invite the affected party to participate;
  • fund or support an independent forensic assessment;
  • coordinate properly instructed counsel where no conflict exists;
  • pursue Aweswell's own direct loss arising from the same events.

Inactive does not mean abandoned

A party may have stopped communicating, lacked funding, changed management, lacked the complete evidence or considered litigation uneconomic. “Abandoned claim” will not be used without evidence of a release, settlement, discontinuance, final disposition or another equivalent legal effect.

Existence and control

Does the entity still exist? Who directs, liquidates or administers it?

Claim history

Was there a claim, settlement, release, assignment, discontinuance, insurance or subrogation?

Limitation and participation

Which period applies, was it interrupted, and does the rights-holder now wish to participate?

One factual matrix, several routes and several forums

Each proceeding has its own parties, object, standard and remedies. Coordination prevents contradiction and double recovery; it does not turn all routes into one cause.

Civil and contractual

Damages, debt, restitution, declarations, interim relief and contractual remedies.

Commercial and corporate

Governance, directors, shareholders, transfers, conflicts and structural modifications.

Insolvency

Estate, claims, liquidation, award, surplus, accounts and insolvency causes of action.

Criminal

Reports, evidence, investigation, victim participation and civil recovery where the law permits. Public prosecution remains controlled by the competent authority.

Regulatory and supervisory

Market integrity, investor information, regulated conduct, correction, sanction or referral.

Administrative and public-authority liability

Public acts, licences, tourism, tax, funds, transparency and individualised harm where the legal requirements are met.

Professional and disciplinary

Duties of lawyers, insolvency office-holders and other professionals before their competent bodies.

Tracing and enforcement

Preservation, recognition and recovery against assets or defendants lawfully reachable in the relevant jurisdiction.

Forensic claimant intake and liability management

No third party or amount enters the consolidated recovery dashboard until the following controls are completed—or expressly marked open:

  1. Identity and statusLegal name, identifier, jurisdiction, current existence and controlling person.
  2. Ownership and authorityDirect owner, insolvency office-holder, assignee, subrogated party, principal or disputed position.
  3. Direct injuryAsset, contract or interest affected; date; immediate and consequential loss; person who actually suffered it.
  4. Defendant and causationDuty or relationship → act or omission → knowledge → effect → claimant-specific loss.
  5. Law and forumJurisdictional gateway, clauses, asset location, insolvency exclusivity and enforcement.
  6. Limitation and procedural historyAccrual, knowledge, interruption, earlier proceedings, settlement, release, discontinuance and preclusion.
  7. Evidence and quantumPrimary documents, accounts, expert method, counterfactual, mitigation and confidence level.
  8. No duplication and conflictsReconcile asset, fruits, rent, profit, margin, shareholder loss, insurance, restitution and public compensation; control privilege, data and settlement authority.

Three nodes, three recovery functions

Insolvency Administrator · follow money and assets

Can the full bridge be reproduced from recognised credit through interest, the EUR 400,000/locales component, bidding, dación, cancellations, payments, costs and surplus?

Open Administrator reconstruction →

Court / Judge · follow knowledge and decisions

What was actually before the court, what was decided, what remained outside scope, what consequence followed, and what route can correct a continuing effect?

Open judicial matrix →

LAJ / Court Office · follow documents and finality

Request → decision → certified content → finality → service → delivery → external use → current effect.

Open LAJ traceability →

Three planes that must not be collapsed

Insolvency · LPB

Estate, assets, value, income, payments, causes of action, conclusion and restoration.

Extra-insolvency · Matkator / third parties

Property, title, possession, access, exploitation and fruits not automatically absorbed into LPB's estate.

Cross-border · Aweswell and other foreign interests

Investor/shareholder value, capital, financing, costs, contracts, direct losses and remedies crossing borders, without conflating them with LPB's estate.

What this strategy does not presume

Adverse outcome ≠ misconduct · judicial error ≠ prevarication · testimony issued ≠ improper use · chronology ≠ causation · missing document in our corpus ≠ non-existence · group label ≠ common legal identity, common intent or common claim ownership · commercial proximity ≠ representation · inactivity ≠ abandonment.

Por Derecho invites any affected person or institution to provide primary material that confirms, corrects or contradicts this reconstruction. The next phase is not another general trawl: it is a targeted claimant-by-claimant review of authority, law, forum, limitation, injury and quantum.

See the institutional accountability hub →