E.G. 745/2026 · NAT-FIS-004 · VERSION 12 SEPTEMBER 2026

Reconsideration appeal and evidential annex: complete version prepared for signature.

The 12 September set contains all eight appeal grounds, seven requests and three supplementary requests, together with the evidential annex and its matrices. It retains the earlier arguments and develops the ONA/Clubotel financed exit, the distinction between creditor status, title and material conduct, and separate examination of the Insolvency Administrator, the judge and each Public Prosecution act.

Appellant: Gil Marer, solely in his own name and right. References to Luchy Playa Blanca, S.L.U. (LPB), Aweswell Limited, Matkator or other entities do not imply that Gil represents them in this appeal.

Status: prepared for signature; filing not verified. Gil's stated target is Monday 14 September 2026. This is a planning date, not a statement of the legal deadline or proof of filing. No filing receipt for this appeal is recorded here. The document is dated on actual signature.

Complete public version of the argument. Personal identification and contact details, private-source fingerprints and reserved details of professional communications are expressly omitted. Complete originals and native sources remain in private custody; this public copy does not replace the original to be signed and filed.

Gil's causal clarification. He states that the forcible seizure of the hotel prevented him from making the 2018 court application for full payment of the final schedule and conclusion under Article 176. The absence of that application is not presented as a negative omission by him. The allegation remains distinct from proof of every condition, act, state of knowledge and effect.

The appeal requests review of the archive decision, examination of the actual corpus, functional attribution, access and preservation. It retains the attributed complaint and criminal hypothesis requiring proof for each actor, alongside adverse decisions, alternative explanations and Fiscal Inspection's jurisdictional limits.

Preserved antecedents · read as of their stated dates

The following content preserves the arguments and limitations of the earlier pages in full. References to a “current”, “outstanding” or yet-to-be-generated version describe the state at that time; the 12 September version and filing status above are the current control. Historical references to other entities do not expand Gil’s capacity in this appeal. Private-source fingerprints are withheld in this public projection.

MASTER PROCEEDINGS · NAT-FIS-004 · UPDATED 10-SEP-2026

E.G. 745/2026

Fiscal Inspection of the Fiscalía General del Estado · archival decree and potestative reconsideration appeal.

Controlling update: the public pre-filing appeal page was strengthened on 10 September. The 9 September package and hashes remain preserved as a historical snapshot, but are no longer presented as the substantively complete text if the new grounds are to be included. Open the successor appeal: ONA exit, Administrator, judge and Prosecution Service →

Status: the file was archived by signed Decree dated 26 August 2026. The strengthened appeal is PUBLIC / PRE-FILING / NOT FILED; no REG-AGE receipt is established. Web publication ≠ administrative filing.

Attributed thesis of Gil Marer / Aweswell. Review should examine a developed funded exit with ONA/Clubotel as operating anchor; the alleged frustration of that exit by private actors and by distinct acts or omissions of the Insolvency Administrator and judge; the multiple separate routes already activated concerning both; and the allegation that prosecution acts operated as an institutional protective wrapper by reusing or maintaining adverse premises when investigation of the Administrator or judge was requested. The sequence is not itself proof of criminal agreement, shared intent or adjudicated responsibility.

Master IDNAT-FIS-004

TypeFISCALIA_FILE · TRUE

Originating organInspección Fiscal de la Fiscalía General del Estado

NIG—

Appeal statusPUBLIC · PRE-FILING · NOT FILED

SourceVERIFIED_PRIMARY + CONTROLLED HISTORICAL PACKAGE + SUCCESSOR PUBLIC CONTROL

ONA-funded exit

The corpus preserves operating work, due diligence/valuation, contractual documentation, staged security, financing routes and communications after 7 June. The causal question is which condition remained open, which actor could affect it, and which act or omission preserved or frustrated it.

Before 7 June → · Unitary ONA record →

Administrator + judge: separate routes

DI 248/2018; RPL 3304/2025 and 3319/2025; P.O. 641/2024 and RPL 421/2026; DP 1956/2026 and control 22; RPL 2523/2025; Control 24; DI 169/2026 and Administrative Appeal 286/2026, among other connections. Shared facts or evidence do not merge them.

Insolvency Administrator → · Control 24 →

Prosecution / classification

The 12-Mar-2019 → 7-May-2019 line is central: Ricardo de Mosteyrín Sampalo signed the classification opinion; Elena Herrera Rodríguez, not Ricardo, signed the DI 248 archive that invoked “este Ministerio” having already taken the adverse culpability/responsibility position. The appeal asks for independence, corpus and correction opportunities to be tested.

Ricardo de Mosteyrín → · Classification →

Finite checks

Exact E.G. 745 corpus; source for the DI 248 dación premise; evidence before the classification prosecutor; identity/position of the prosecutor at the 25-Jul-2023 hearing; ONA documentation received by the Administrator/Court; and merits treatment versus competence, archive, joinder or routing across the 2026 prosecution chain.

An open gap is not promoted into an adverse conclusion. It must close through primary evidence, a reasoned explanation or documented exclusion.

Controlled historical package

09SEP2026 appeal: SHA-256 [fingerprint in private custody].

Verified ZIP: SHA-256 [fingerprint in private custody]. The package is not rewritten. A formal appeal containing the new grounds requires a new dated version, new fingerprints and an official receipt.

Historical SHA-256 manifestHistorical control retained in private custody. · Historical READMEHistorical control retained in private custody. · Complete successor appeal

Express prosecution relations

GC-FIS-013DI 248/2018Fiscalía Provincial de Las Palmas GC-FIS-014DI 113/2022Fiscalía Provincial de Las Palmas GC-FIS-016DI 22/2026Fiscalía Provincial de Las Palmas GC-FIS-017DIP 2/2026Fiscalía de la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias GC-FIS-018EG 49/2026Fiscalía General del Estado GC-CRI-008DP 1901/2026Judicial route linked through prosecution production

These links reconstruct the perimeter and enable evidential cross-pollination. They do not prove joinder, shared knowledge, coordination, causation or liability.

← Master Register · Unitary criminal evidence map · Proceedings directory