RECEIPT → DELIMITATION → REFERRAL → RECONCILIATION

General Comptroller and SIINF: three communications, distinct functions and incomplete traceability.

Outgoing 699645/2026 clarifies how March and June must be read. The Office limits its competence but does not certify the general absence of other aid, regional incentives, European/ERDF funding, payments, certifications or files.

ERDF / FEDER · evidence → traceability → action

ERDF / EU funds: what is established, what remains open and what to do next

How to use this page. Custody map: referral or remit limitation does not substitute the ERDF file or expenditure trace.

Por Derecho visual on ERDF traceability and asset recovery
Editorial action-routing aid; it does not establish fraud, corruption, duplicate funding, EU-budget loss, a PIF nexus, EPPO/OLAF competence or individual liability.
✓
Established

The controlled public record identifies the EU/ERDF connection for the MYND/GC/836/P06 project.

?
Still to produce

Exact operation and percentage, eligible expenditure, invoices, payment/certification, verifications, audits, corrections and recovery.

≠
Keep separate

RIC tax relief, RICPE investment, Regional Incentives, State aid and FEDER/ERDF are not one funding source.

Minimum production needed to close the ERDF question
  1. operation identifier and programme/fund
  2. beneficiary and title/availability record
  3. eligible-cost schedule and invoices/supporting records
  4. funding sources and other aid declared
  5. certifications, payments and verified employment
  6. verifications, audits, issues, corrections or recoveries

Directive (EU) 2024/1260 · FEDER/ERDF · EPPO/OLAF: Editorial action-routing aid; it does not establish fraud, corruption, duplicate funding, EU-budget loss, a PIF nexus, EPPO/OLAF competence or individual liability.

Controlled sequence

  1. 184368/2026 · 5 March: remit delimitation and activation of the internal integrity route, subject to confidentiality.
  2. 497011/2026 · 11 June: identification of the RIC route and referral to the competent Vice-Ministry.
  3. 699645/2026 · 19 August: refusal of an all-encompassing audit at a third party’s request and express clarification that June was not a general nonexistence certificate.

Rule: a remit limitation may be correct; the auditable issue is whether delimitation, referral, receipt and response were documented.

Open the full three-response analysis

SIINF does not replace native files

SIINF is a route for objective indications within the Canary autonomous-administration scope. It does not replace production of RIC file 02/2022, GC/836/P06, the ERDF operation, payments, controls, invoices, assets or employment evidence.

The August letter notes the channel’s availability; it does not by itself confirm a new specific referral or the outcome of the March communication.