Document reader · 8 September 2026
Public-copy SHA-256: 31bef81113bc23de08a7181dd777ffb345e486b7c19bb31f9ac551a9573f564e
Original SHA-256: a7886232be40f8b67bc6323c1a392352486810f35bddac81afe1c951ce25db93
Public-copy SHA-256: 2f579188610ac7743cd85a873e1700063c69191b42da1cbd8a75dc5be3b77cdf
Original SHA-256: 75d933e92fcb4313eb180c0a702b422b2b6dbca3d7c7e9b86071c611bd625cc3
Public-copy SHA-256: 28d8156b3b1f5dd8d74bae9275c27c7bbf11049f479aaa42654e1e7df3a1ed77
Original SHA-256: 0bb37f6d0ceaa6de1e95db73d0498d30d38144c84e4e7cd9ee84fd1a1f24e9ca
Public-copy SHA-256: 09aa1809de5b4e1ab6643225c0fa3379a01c06a3233ce168ae0567545eb4654a
Original SHA-256: 41d658e4ec9dead633c745f5754fd5478a2019cb72b4db9d3e235d0d4982b611
Public-copy SHA-256: f442dee2d09bbdef6d63d2841f165d5d82fac0f778e0077718767a535d6376c2
Original SHA-256: 4758a672f1782a5e926d89ad46118f184fd7d4b273edfb14d009125374e132bc
Public-copy SHA-256: f637904a3c14d3d141d7be23bdb53cbf7adc94ec13cc8f55ea08b17cdd1ca4c1
Original SHA-256: c40603b3d38fb825256f277321655e274a24d66b3f40c264dd44c708f845df79
Public-copy SHA-256: 970573279cc4002aacd6e5da666076922a17c31952c2a5d13b252e9db2364693
Original SHA-256: 4e41bb87e9a51c2a117beb5bf17e36e2fcb101c71fc973a9c0c9b85f34b4f00e
Public-copy SHA-256: 39bd18240375469163ba0ae17789f3370780eb198d77497d33a7293a41bea9c5
Original SHA-256: 88af767a2268a3f0f3bdde92ba69ecc0170518cf3454c3617247a9fef6f4a2a6
Public-copy SHA-256: adbc6f632fec00c95f800e11e45c95f2cfa89beb75eedc1d0d685c279152a7c3
Original SHA-256: a903f9aaff7ddbe5258ea3a7f3657f5175bd50442c3b36b2118180ec67f9ddd1
Public-copy SHA-256: 2e1fe23903eb73acb7e3e3f41d2b0272371ee6a38fec3c0c04f91ebda3911b17
Original SHA-256: a9739ab1f0aa9759c2a2fc24961297865bea8699330d8acced31f27d740f4f34
Public-copy SHA-256: 287972699382053ba1444248c52ee03a79548e8496f159baa3994d517a838f9f
Original SHA-256: 8c309e7faf6ec95653dd83c9941f565b54956cd529322ab8eb7d88120b9e35c5
Public-copy SHA-256: 74560347d9381f27a5d6afe0017ae81b348a0726304a3b8510af4fa475d86622
Original SHA-256: dcd27bb4dc7cc0e361805a76e3dec2bded2a23a9a2d3c01713fb76cd80116fe0
Public-copy SHA-256: 04692819b630382965bd3bd39959f821f69cfd426c1761d702d7d501974021d0
Original SHA-256: eed0c82246047e39b45d3ebc0c1f028dde6ae8f88e61441eb56ca2aaf18451a6
Partial coverage: the complete docket and every annex are not certified. A pleading copy does not by itself prove filing; a party report or prosecutorial opinion is not a judicial decision.
| Source date | Submission / act | Recorded status | Public copy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-28 | Sentencia 163/2023 — calificación del Concurso 36/2012Source identification and statusC36-JUD-2023-09-28-163ISSUED_JUDICIAL_OR_LAJ_COPY NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_ISSUED_ACT Earlier and later acts
| Copy of a judicial or court-office act. Authority act or service record; it is not a party pleading. | Judgment 163/2023 — 28 September 2023 |
| 2023-10-30 | Gil Marer — recurso de apelación contra Sentencia 163/2023Source identification and statusF360-GIL-CALIFICACION-APPEAL-20231030EXACT_NATIVE_APPEAL_PRINCIPAL_AND_LINKED_RECEIPT_VERIFIED EXACT_NATIVE_PRINCIPAL_SHA256_MATCH Earlier and later acts
| Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. | GIL: filed appeal GIL: filing receipt |
| 2023-10-30 | Pink y Patricia — recurso de apelación contra Sentencia 163/2023Source identification and statusF360-PINK-PATRICIA-CALIFICACION-APPEAL-20231031EXACT_NATIVE_APPEAL_PRINCIPAL_AND_LINKED_RECEIPT_VERIFIED EXACT_NATIVE_PRINCIPAL_SHA256_MATCH Earlier and later acts | Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. | PINK: filed appeal PINK: filing receipt |
| 2023-10-31 | Gil Marer — escrito aportando justificante del depósito del recurso de apelaciónSource identification and statusF360-GIL-DEPOSIT-SUBMISSION-20231031EXACT_NATIVE_DEPOSIT_PLEADING_AND_LINKED_RECEIPT_VERIFIED EXACT_NATIVE_PRINCIPAL_SHA256_MATCH Earlier and later acts | Detailed status retained in the verification record. Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. | Gil: deposit submission — 31 October 2023 Gil: deposit-submission receipt — 31 October 2023 |
| 2023-11-01 | LPB — recurso de apelación contra Sentencia 163/2023Source identification and statusF360-LPB-CALIFICACION-APPEAL-20231102EXACT_NATIVE_APPEAL_PRINCIPAL_AND_LINKED_RECEIPT_VERIFIED EXACT_NATIVE_PRINCIPAL_SHA256_MATCH Earlier and later acts | Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. Original principal document matched to its filing receipt. | LPB: filed appeal LPB: filing receipt |
| 2023-11-06 | Personación de Gil Marer — 6 de noviembre de 2023Source identification and statusC36-LAJ-2023-11-06-GIL-APPEARANCEISSUED_JUDICIAL_OR_LAJ_COPY NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_ISSUED_ACT Earlier and later acts | Copy of a judicial or court-office act. Authority act or service record; it is not a party pleading. | Gil: appearance recognised — 6 November 2023 |
| 2023-11-06 | Recursos de Gil y Pink/Patricia tenidos por interpuestos — 6 de noviembre de 2023Source identification and statusC36-LAJ-2023-11-06-GIL-PINK-APPEALSISSUED_JUDICIAL_OR_LAJ_COPY NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_ISSUED_ACT Earlier and later acts | Copy of a judicial or court-office act. Authority act or service record; it is not a party pleading. | Gil and Patricia/PINK: appeals timely and interposed — 6 November 2023 |
| 2023-11-06 | Requerimiento de acreditación del depósito de LPB — 6 de noviembre de 2023Source identification and statusC36-LAJ-2023-11-06-LPB-DEPOSITISSUED_JUDICIAL_OR_LAJ_COPY NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_ISSUED_ACT Earlier and later acts | Copy of a judicial or court-office act. Authority act or service record; it is not a party pleading. | LPB: direction to prove the deposit — 6 November 2023 |
| 2026-05-11 | RPL 2523/2025 — providencia de señalamiento de deliberación, votación y falloSource identification and statusRPL2523-JUD-2026-05-11-LISTINGISSUED_JUDICIAL_OR_LAJ_COPY NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_ISSUED_ACT Earlier and later acts | Copy of a judicial or court-office act. Authority act or service record; it is not a party pleading. | Listing direction — RPL 2523/2025, 11 May 2026 |
The historical record and its relationships are preserved below. Recovered contextual links describe historical navigation; they are not a new determination of a close legal connection.
DO NOW · appeal → record → evidence → corrective jurisdiction
This page does not seek to pressure individual judges. Its purpose is to show which appeals exist, what record reached second instance, what later evidence has been sought, and which procedural questions condition appellate review.
A 16 September 2025 LexNET filing to Section 4 requested information and certifications from the culpability section: appearing parties, creditor submissions, recipients of the culpability report, and reasoned/documented creditor reports. The value of this track is record completeness in the culpability appeal.
An order signed on 8 June 2026 set deliberation, vote and judgment for 9 July 2026. That document is a scheduling act, not a merits decision.
An order dated 15 July 2026 accumulated appeal 3319/2025 into 3304/2025. The chamber also recorded that certain appearing parties in 3304/2025 had not yet been served with the appeal and ordered the corresponding procedural step; it also opened submissions regarding opposition/cross-appeal and a request for documentary evidence in second instance.
It takes four relevant procedural steps: accumulates 3319/2025 into 3304/2025; gives ten days for opposition/cross-appeal regarding LPB's appeal; gives five days on whether there remains an interest in deciding a reconsideration request in 3319/2025; and gives five days regarding LPB's request for documentary evidence.
It does not decide the merits and does not establish that the entire Sun Park history is before the chamber. That is why the proper public question is whether the record is sufficient and traceable for the issues actually under appeal.
A Provincial Court is not a de novo investigative body. Review is bounded by the appealed rulings, grounds, transmitted record and rules governing later evidence. The correct question is not why the chamber does not investigate the whole history, but whether it has a complete and procedurally usable record for what is actually before it.
It does not establish bias, judicial wrongdoing, deliberate delay or concealment. Nor does it turn accumulation, scheduling or procedural cure into a conclusion on the merits.