# Concurso 36/2012 — separation, remuneration, orders and decisions: provenance

Control date: 23 August 2026
Dedicated public routes: `es/concurso-36-2012-autos-resoluciones/` and `en/insolvency-36-2012-orders-decisions/`
Analytical routes: `es/concurso-36-2012-separacion-ac-honorarios/` and English counterpart
Canonical analysis: `archive/AC_SEPARATION_FEES_AUTOS_DP1901_REFERENCE22_UNITARY_DIGEST_23AUG2026.md`
Full-text manifest: `assets/data/concurso36-autos-fulltext-v1.json`

## Corpus now published

The controlled corpus contains **50 redacted full-text records**:

| Lane | Court / LAJ acts | Party filings | Source pages / units |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Removal of the Insolvency Administrator and appeals | 16 | 16 | 163 |
| Remuneration / civil-liability claim and appeal | 9 | 9 | 88 |
| **Total** | **25** | **25** | **251** |

Every record has a stable ID (`R01`–`R32`, `F01`–`F18`), date, actor, instrument, procedure, source anchor, SHA-256, copy-status statement and a link to its complete substantive transcript. PDF records retain source-page markers. DOCX working copies are expressly labelled as lacking authoritative pagination and, where applicable, as lacking a separate filing receipt in the recovered corpus.

## Principal primary sources

| Source | Date / extent | Source anchor | Original attachment SHA-256 | Controlled split/copy SHA-256 | Public treatment |
|---|---:|---|---|---|---|
| Aweswell application to remove the Insolvency Administrator (`R01`) | 23 Apr 2025 · 58 pages | Gmail `19663da50d6eb73e`, `1. Demanda.pdf`; supplied bundle pp. 23–80 | `5665ec05ae42f18fc64b1209ed7984c39ece015933bdfc9dd8bcf1a8ece6bf26` | `40663e4911b772152344d99880231241071b26c7acf24db7adb3895a7e76a82d` | Complete redacted, page-addressable transcript. |
| Professional-liability / remuneration claim (`F01`) | 1 Sep 2024 · 21 pages | Gmail `193a8015d8eee373`, `Demanda Honorarios AC 1SEP2024.pdf`; supplied bundle pp. 2–22 | `6f44c28781f56a46eb5df12b54f33eebd0848a05167eac2dc4f3fe19a5d90430` | `959fa2a662ea05566812be9796af9bed65fd1a64f3e5bef4fb889ff16d6e00fc` | Complete redacted, page-addressable transcript. |
| Auto 1377/2025 (`R05`) | 12 Sep 2025 · 3 pages | Gmail `19952646b51e374b`; supplied bundle pp. 81–83 | `bcb7a0fb242949ca20d2b9ad85a1113d6b84e834bd716cbe90a0bd8ce15f2bfd` | `a52f817d32143e3ec5429d9a7f80472a9cbf37197aaeecc4605f98c86808b883` | Complete transcript and irreversible image-only public PDF. |
| Auto on clarification of the 25 July providencia (`R06`) | 12 Sep 2025 · 2 pages | Supplied bundle pp. 84–85 | — | recorded in full-text manifest | Complete transcript and image-only public PDF; expressly not mislabelled as the reconsideration order. |
| Auto resolving reconsideration (`R09`) | 11 Nov 2025 · 4 pages | Gmail `19a7d06c03e1c731`; supplied bundle pp. 86–89 | `271b72e5c05fbcb46270b945c0489b562454dc135fbd49e38586a4166e628e84` | `a76be9747bd62dffc19ed859c27821f976e5b126dcb9ccea401a47f9c47594cb` | Complete transcript and irreversible image-only public PDF. |
| Judgment 4/2026 (`F13`) | 21 Jan 2026 · 5 pages | Gmail `19bfb3134cbaf69a`; supplied bundle pp. 90–94 | — | `663f7bae1efd6781c761aa7d64a00b909d69a209ca5fa856e32932905d23697c` | Complete transcript and irreversible image-only public PDF. |
| Appeal Court Order 223/2026 (`R30`) | 15 Jul 2026 · 4 pages | Gmail `19f8a422471edc64` | — | `0ccda8e853eee308c793b0d000264b286f2a0fb66eea2afa81bde65fb127ecd2` | Complete transcript and irreversible image-only public PDF. |
| Criminal complaint concerning the Insolvency Administrator | 18 Jun 2026 · 48 pages | Gmail `19ed19724709f79b`, `01_Denuncia_Penal_AC_LPB_Sun_Park_FINAL_18JUN2026.pdf` | `5f2925609563caec6c82f4e95fa16abb660f372a34051133fe0f01aa785483f7` | not part of this two-lane full-text corpus | Structured digest only; it remains a separate criminal/intake-reference lane. |

The remaining 43 source hashes and anchors are authoritative in `assets/data/concurso36-autos-fulltext-v1.json`; that manifest prevents a prose table from becoming the only source of document-level provenance.

## Ten generated public PDFs

| Record | Public file | Pages | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---:|---|
| R05 | `ac-removal-fees/auto-1377-2025-removal-public-redacted.pdf` | 3 | `a19975991ddf5aceb17f95247d05c7a7cd115bf9cd4ce6e7b3c7f127aeeba5b7` |
| R09 | `ac-removal-fees/auto-11nov2025-reconsideration-public-redacted.pdf` | 4 | `da1fc63c666cf20167d1075dbc06e85afd66fc985a8c9255507b7364c1358220` |
| R02 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/laj-28abr2025-traslado-separacion-public-redacted.pdf` | 1 | `051a06dcd025b0cad795b27828b697bf0d9dcae11e5db4a8ad071b5ec034c49c` |
| R04 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/laj-20may2025-puesta-a-resolver-public-redacted.pdf` | 1 | `9270af9e90950003ab48903e30a98e1c1a4abfa7e4790ab067cc681b6c658204` |
| R06 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/auto-12sep2025-aclaracion-providencia-public-redacted.pdf` | 2 | `93a0adef54dd3723b0f459a96f69a4951d73b0b0adf0fe7e6c96eb65011ddfb4` |
| R30 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/auto-223-2026-acumulacion-public-redacted.pdf` | 4 | `5c7238860f599acc46492c8d255f23a07d71c7d7baefd5242f97894ece518fe5` |
| F02 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/decreto-113-2024-inhibicion-public-redacted.pdf` | 2 | `6e6d92c2c004f8101bed2335beed2a56139747d4120371e32c1d91e6486eebb8` |
| F03 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/decreto-28nov2024-admision-honorarios-public-redacted.pdf` | 2 | `35a598c84620cb9ab2b450894e88be206e35c8255d887448486041abed883ddd` |
| F13 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/sentencia-4-2026-honorarios-public-redacted.pdf` | 5 | `5f2377f91b5b1b6d3fbdc38c00b7b68523a7677ad9b9d7f2cb50ce04c89f9653` |
| F14 | `concurso-autos/public-pdfs/decreto-21ene2026-no-aclaracion-public-redacted.pdf` | 2 | `880f46de585bfa9251416eae7d693f73bfdaa0adfa8dbaf9ddef0a147d2c4773` |

The builders are `scripts/build_public_ac_orders.py` and `scripts/build_concurso_autos_public_pdfs.py`. Each output is reconstructed from raster images, has no searchable text layer, AcroForm, annotation, XML metadata or inherited verification stream, and was visually reviewed page by page after conversion.

## Redaction rule

The public transcripts retain the complete located substantive text and show redaction markers. They remove only:

- repeated court administrative headers, NIG/IUP and verification codes;
- personal/contact identifiers, direct telephone/email data and bank/policy identifiers;
- electronic-signature metadata; and
- names of procedural professionals not needed to understand the decision or allegation.

Judicial decision-makers, the Insolvency Administrator, the principal entities, procedure numbers, dates, reasoning and operative parts remain visible. Internal source inconsistencies are not silently normalised. Examples include the month/date mismatch in the AC appellate filing, the year `2026` written in a diligence for the order actually dated 11 November 2025, and differing names in a body/signature block.

## Known gaps

The archive does **not** claim that every docket item ever filed has been recovered. At the cut-off:

1. the Decree of 1 September 2025 and the March 2025 diligence cited in the remuneration clarification incident were not located as autonomous source files;
2. no minutes or recording of the 20 January 2026 preliminary hearing were located;
3. no signed later merits decision was located in RPL 421/2026; and
4. no signed merits outcome after Auto 223/2026 was located in accumulated RPL 3304/2025 and 3319/2025.

## Controlling legal formulation

The removal application and remuneration claim were both rejected at first instance on active-standing grounds. The located first-instance decisions did not adjudicate the substantive removal grounds or the legality and amount of the remuneration. Auto 223/2026 combined the two removal appeals but did not decide their merits. Party filings record allegations and requested relief; they are not findings of fact.