Document reader · 8 September 2026
Documents, submissions and decisions
0 registered acts0 viewable documents
No public document copy is linked from this record. This does not mean that the original does not exist: recovery, custody and public release are verified separately.
Partial coverage: the complete docket and every annex are not certified. A pleading copy does not by itself prove filing; a party report or prosecutorial opinion is not a judicial decision.
The historical record and its relationships are preserved below. Recovered contextual links describe historical navigation; they are not a new determination of a close legal connection.
MASTER PROCEEDING · GC-HC-010 · REG. NO. 24 · CONTINUITY-CONTROLLED 04-SEP-2026
Reg. No. 24 — complaint concerning judicial decisions and supervision in Insolvency Proceeding 36/2012
One canonical record, two filing events: the original complaint presented through the Las Palmas Decanato on 18 June 2026 and its dependent supplement presented on 25 June 2026. Both belong to the same Daily Registration No. 24 record. The filing itself is part of the controlled record; what remains unresolved is where the Decanato subsequently routed it and what treatment, if any, followed.
Digitised filing chain
18 June 2026: original complaint/notitia criminis presented through the Decanato under daily registration no. 24.
25 June 2026: a 10-page supplementary filing was presented to clarify and strengthen the original package. The reporting party describes physical joinder to Control 24; electronic joinder remains to be certified.
After 25 June: location, custody, remittal and preservation were pursued. The combined record was subsequently reported to the CGPJ within 169/2026, and the Decanato, TSJC and CGPJ are being asked to trace and confirm the post-intake route.
What has been fully digitised
The public Control 24 dossier records the located signed 79-page package, including the 31-page principal complaint and ten selected annexes, the 10-page 25 June supplement, the five documentary issue modules, presentation/status chronology, evidential boundaries and related-action architecture.
Open the full polished Control 24 digitisation →
Named judicial actor and underlying proceeding
The complaint concerns acts attributed by the complainant to Alberto López Villarrubia, then Magistrate-Judge of Commercial Court No. 1 of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, in the context of Insolvency Proceeding 36/2012. Attribution in the complaint is not an adjudicated finding.
Open the insolvency-judge / court record →
Procedural boundary — use the filing, do not invent the route
Daily registration no. 24 is a reception locator, not a NIG, Preliminary Proceedings number, High Court case number or proof of a formal private-prosecution complaint. The fact that the complaint was filed through the Decanato under Reg. No. 24 may be stated and used as a filing, chronology and provenance fact. The fact that its later route has not yet been traced may likewise be stated as the present status gap.
The TSJ Canarias / TSJC route is recorded only as the expected or presumed competence route. Until reparto, receipt, docket or equivalent primary evidence is obtained, it is not described as the verified originating organ, assigned court or current custodian. No admission, transfer, investigation, dismissal, archive or merits outcome is asserted without primary documentary support.
Open continuity and evidential-boundary control →