INSOLVENCY 36/2012 · JUDGMENT 163/2023 · RPL 2523/2025
One view showing who filed what, which copy is located, what is certified, what remains open and which material belongs to another forum. The map prevents a strong narrative from becoming broader than its sources.
ATTRIBUTION
This is the public position of Gil Marer / Por Derecho. It does not speak collectively for LPB, Pink Canary Services, Patricia Domínguez or Aweswell; it does not speak for any procedural representative; and it does not replace, amend or enlarge any filed pleading.
INSTRUMENTS · DO NOT CONFUSE A PARTY WITH A PLEADING
| Interest | Instrument | Evidence state | Finite gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPB | Separate opposition dated 23-Apr-2019 | Complete source set located Opposition and nine annexes; Judgment 163/2023 AH 7; LexNET receipt and first page also controlled. | Certified reconciliation of the located set with the exact filed pleading/annexes and court index. |
| Gil Marer | Separate 64-page opposition; digitally signed 10-Jun-2019 | Signed copy located SHA-256 f442b685…a9815; the distinct draft is separated. | Certified court index and principal receipt. |
| Pink Canary + Patricia | One joint six-page opposition filed 24-Mar-2021 | Copy + receipt located LexNET 202110397349419; SHA-256 fd87b981…f24fe. | Certified service and record mapping. |
| Aweswell | No opposition identified in this section | Not identified Not listed as an affected person in Judgment 163/2023. | Only a contrary certified docket would change the control. |
| Interest | Instrument | Evidence state | Finite gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gil Marer | Separate appeal filed 30-Oct-2023 | Filed copy located The 31-Oct receipt evidences the deposit, not by itself the principal transmission. | Principal LexNET receipt and certified mapping. |
| Pink Canary + Patricia | One joint 17-page appeal filed 30-Oct-2023 | Copy + receipt located The 19-page version is a superseded draft. | Certified service and docket mapping. |
| LPB | Separate appeal reported filed 2-Nov-2023 | Filing supported; principal pending Contemporaneous report, later deposit/cure material and 11-May-2026 decision. | Exact appeal, principal receipt, entry, pages and grounds. |
| Aweswell | No appeal from Judgment 163/2023 identified | Separate lane RPL 3319/2025 and RPL 421/2026 are not Calificación merits appeals. | None absent contrary certification. |
POSSIBLE CRIMINAL MISUSE · SERIOUS, DOCUMENT-BASED AND REFUTABLE
The complete 47-page report is located; Judgment 163/2023 rejected or narrowed several branches.
Missing: certified proposition-to-source index, autonomous DOC3 explanation and actor-specific knowledge/response matrix.
The 12-Mar-2019 opinion is located: 15 years, damages and deficit; very limited visible individual reasoning and a facial actor-description defect.
Missing: source file, reviewed material, drafting history and individual knowledge. The defect may be an error and requires clarification.
The adverse Fiscal Calificación position was invoked in the 7-May-2019 archive decree.
Missing: complete DI 248 file and requested/performed/omitted/assessed/decided diligence ledger. No personal coordination is inferred.
The judgment accepted some propositions, rejected or narrowed others and is under appeal.
Missing: certified evidence-before-court matrix, official hearing record, transmitted index and certified current decision/status.
The sequence permits investigation of direct or indirect benefit; it does not prove agreement, agency, purpose or offence.
Missing: asset–decision–flow–beneficiary–harm–counterfactual trace, strongest innocent explanation and legal-person separation.
Controlling hypothesis: transfer of value + inversion of responsibility + diversion of scrutiny. It must be narrowed or abandoned when primary production contradicts it.
PROCEDURAL STATUS
a later merits judgment or order after the deliberation scheduled for 4-Jun-2026.
its service, finality or pending-remedy certification.
a certified appeal docket and transmitted-record index.
an official hearing acta, certified recording or integrity/provenance record.
Not located does not mean nonexistent. The finite action is to obtain current certification from the court or procedural representatives, not infer the outcome.
RELATED CONTEXT · OUTSIDE THE RPL LANE
The public comparison of 2018 valuations may inform an economic investigation into value, causation and benefit. It is not asserted to have been filed, admitted or transmitted in RPL 2523/2025.
CONTRARY EVIDENCE AND REPLY
Drafting error, legitimate evidential disagreement, lawful procedural discretion, incomplete source access, independent institutional reasoning or benefit without agreement or criminal purpose must be tested, not hidden. Silence is not admission; an adverse decision is not proof of offence; aligned benefit is not proof of coordination or capture.
Right of reply and correction. Every person or institution may provide a decision, certified index, exculpatory document, alternative explanation or verifiable correction. A substantive correction receives equivalent visibility with its date, source and scope preserved.
CAEPR IDENTITY · RPL 2523/2025
The 12 March 2019 prosecution opinion and the 25 July 2023 hearing form part of the documentary chain under appeal. This link does not attribute an act in RPL 2523/2025 to the prosecutor.
^ verifies identity only. Full census and pending exceptions →