whole-unit depreciation
ACTÚA adopts 20 years physical age and in April expressly defends applying 57.14% to the total functional unit rather than property by property.
ACTÚA · CAM · JAN–APR 2018 · PRIMARY SOURCES RECOVERED
The evidential question is now precise: what representative property-level basis supported a whole-complex condition conclusion and uniform depreciation where ACTÚA did not access 100% of the interior and its own 61-unit figure is expressly presented as information supplied to the valuer?
ACTÚA adopts 20 years physical age and in April expressly defends applying 57.14% to the total functional unit rather than property by property.
ACTÚA records at least 61 unrefurbished units but attributes that figure to information received. Provider and exact property list remain open.
ACTÚA states it could not access the interior of 100% of the complex and says overall condition was also inferred from general exterior images.
The record is mixed: it documents deterioration and three worn apartment interiors, but also usable-looking common areas, people visibly present and an intact-looking reception. Only three images are clear apartment interiors and none is visibly identified by apartment, finca, block, owner or access provider.
Correction: we do not publish that ACTÚA showed only negative Blocks 4–5 images. The issue is now representativeness, access, the source of 61 and extrapolation of uniform depreciation.
2017 acquisition/minority reconstruction; exact native source still outstanding.
ACTÚA 3 April: at least 61 unrefurbished units according to information supplied to the valuer.
GESVALT professional opinion that approximately 44 were poor and the remainder usable.
The numerical match justifies investigation but does not prove identity. The contemporaneous “two blocks / 61” wording also cannot literally fit Blocks 4+5 as an architectural apartment count.
LexNET id 201810203877878 establishes that CAM filed its pleading and ACTÚA technical responses to GESVALT on 17/04/2018 at 12:27 in Concurso 36/2012 before Mercantile Court nº1 Las Palmas. This proves transmission and litigation position, not the merits or the causal weight assigned by the insolvency administrator/court.
Open: source/list behind 61, interiors actually inspected, keys/access, geolocation of the three interiors, native source for 60, unit basis for ≈44 and later AC/court treatment.