# Intervención General — SALIDA 699645/2026 — public redacted source record

## Public-record status

This file is the **public, redacted institutional derivative** of the text supplied on 20 August 2026. It is not the native signed PDF and is not represented as a complete unredacted evidential copy.

The public repository intentionally omits:

- the addressee’s private email and street address;
- telephone/contact details;
- signatures and signature images;
- the electronic document-verification code;
- other unnecessary personal identifiers.

The native signed PDF and a complete unredacted transcription should be recovered, hashed and retained in a private access-controlled evidence store. GitHub’s public repository is not the primary custody layer for unredacted personal data.

## Institutional metadata retained publicly

- Issuing body: Intervención General de la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias.
- Outgoing reference: **699645/2026**.
- Date shown: **19 August 2026**.
- Capacity of signatory: Viceinterventor General, acting for the Interventora General under the cited organisational regulation.
- Subject: response to requests concerning the communications and submissions of 10 and 11 June and 30 July 2026.
- Source status: user-supplied pasted text; native PDF not yet ingested in this pass.

## Three-response sequence recorded by the institution

1. **SALIDA 184368/2026 — 5 March 2026.** Earlier delimitation of the functions of the Intervención General. The prior source record also documents use of the internal integrity route, subject to its confidentiality framework.
2. **SALIDA 497011/2026 — 11 June 2026.** Reply concerning the RIC suitability route and the Intervención General’s lack of substantive control competence over that declaration; transfer to the Viceconsejería de Hacienda y Relaciones con la Unión Europea.
3. **SALIDA 699645/2026 — 19 August 2026.** Reply to the subsequent clarification and reconciliation requests.

## Controlled substantive digest of SALIDA 699645/2026

### 1. Nature of the requests

The Intervención General characterises the requests as seeking broad certificates, third-party document checks, identification of possible funding sources and promotion of general control or investigative measures across multiple facts, persons, administrations and possible proceedings.

### 2. Its asserted competence

The Office describes its remit as internal economic-financial control of the Canary autonomous public sector through the procedures, plans and concrete control files legally assigned to it. It says it has no general, open-ended power to investigate or certify every possible aid, fund, incentive, payment, financing source or civil, urban, insolvency, corporate and tax issue connected with the asset.

### 3. RIC lane

It restates that the suitability of RIC financial instruments is handled through the competent Finance body, a prior binding AEAT report and a Canary Government decision. It says that RIC suitability is not, by itself, an autonomous subsidy or direct regional-treasury payment and that the Intervención General does not participate in fiscalising that declaration.

### 4. Critical clarification of the June response

The Office expressly states that SALIDA 497011/2026 was **not** a general certificate that no other aid, subsidy, regional incentive, European funding, payment, certification or separate administrative file existed.

That is the controlling correction. It prevents the June reply being used as a universal “no public funds” or “no other files” certificate.

### 5. Other routes remain separate

The letter says that regional incentives, public aid, European/ERDF funds, tax obligations, RIC-linked instruments and local-authority actions must, where applicable, be pursued through their specific procedures and competent bodies.

### 6. No merits determination

The Office says the response does not prejudge:

- the truth of the reported facts;
- the existence or nonexistence of irregularities;
- civil, administrative or criminal responsibility;
- rights, remedies or procedures available before other competent bodies.

### 7. Access and confidentiality position

It argues that complainant or third-party status does not by itself confer interested-party status or general access to a possible financial-control file concerning another entity. It invokes statutory reservation and confidentiality rules. This public record treats that as the Office’s legal position, not as a universal judicial determination of every possible access right.

### 8. SIINF

The letter notes the availability of the Canary internal information system for objective indications involving organs or authorities of the Canary autonomous administration. It does not, by that statement alone, confirm a new specific referral or disclose the outcome of any confidential channel handling.

## What this source does not establish

- It does not establish that no other public support or EU funding existed.
- It does not establish that such support existed, was paid, eligible, overlapping or irregular.
- It does not establish that a specific Intervención control file exists or does not exist.
- It does not establish that the June referral produced a substantive investigation or decision.
- It does not clear or incriminate any identified person, company or public body.

## Native-source and privacy gate

Before this record is used as primary evidence, recover the native signed PDF, verify it through the official verification service, calculate a cryptographic hash and record the custody location. Do not republish private contact data or verification credentials in the public repository.

## Related public analysis

- `/es/intervencion-general-699645-2026/`
- `/en/intervencion-general-699645-2026/`
- `/es/intervencion-general-siinf-trazabilidad/`
- `/en/intervencion-general-siinf-traceability/`