{ "actors": [ { "en": { "actor": "ACTÚA: preparation", "evidence": "15 January report; 3 April response; disclosed access and occupation limits; contemporaneous GESVALT criticism.", "question": "Who commissioned, paid, supplied the 61-unit information, arranged access and selected the photographs?", "test": "Obtain engagement, drafts, native photos, complete inspection notes and input schedules. Separate method error from knowing falsity." }, "es": { "actor": "ACTÚA: elaboración", "evidence": "Informe del 15 de enero; respuesta del 3 de abril; límites de acceso y ocupación; crítica contemporánea de GESVALT.", "question": "¿Quién encargó, pagó, aportó la información de 61 unidades, facilitó el acceso y seleccionó las fotos?", "test": "Recuperar encargo, borradores, fotos originales, notas de inspección y listas de datos. Distinguir error metodológico de falsedad consciente." }, "id": "ACTUA" }, { "en": { "actor": "Acosta Matos: use and benefit", "evidence": "CAM offer, response and filed annexes; current comparison separates the 159-unit branch from the 31-finca branch.", "question": "Which exact report/version supported each offer, pleading and claimed right, and what contrary information had reached the relevant person?", "test": "Trace delivery, authorisation, ownership/control at date, price schedules and any instruction to ACTÚA. Keep S.A./S.L. source identity differences explicit." }, "es": { "actor": "Acosta Matos: uso y beneficio", "evidence": "Oferta, respuesta y anexos de CAM; la comparación vigente separa la rama de 159 unidades de la de 31 fincas.", "question": "¿Qué informe y versión sustentaron cada oferta, escrito y derecho invocado, y qué información contraria recibió la persona correspondiente?", "test": "Rastrear entrega, autorización, titularidad y control por fecha, precios e instrucciones a ACTÚA. Conservar las diferencias de identificación S.A./S.L." }, "id": "CAM" }, { "en": { "actor": "Francisco de Borja Rodríguez-Batllori Laffitte: administration", "evidence": "Plan and annexes, dated correspondence and judicial record; the recovered filing narrows the notice inquiry.", "question": "What reached the administrator before each plan, recommendation, response, control decision and implementation?", "test": "Establish receipt, applicable estate duty, available corrective step, exact act or omission, knowledge and effect. A filed document is not proof of personal receipt." }, "es": { "actor": "Francisco de Borja Rodríguez-Batllori Laffitte: administración", "evidence": "Plan y anexos, correspondencia fechada y expediente judicial; la presentación recuperada concreta la investigación del conocimiento.", "question": "¿Qué recibió el administrador antes de cada plan, recomendación, respuesta, decisión de control y ejecución?", "test": "Acreditar recepción, deber patrimonial aplicable, corrección disponible, acto u omisión, conocimiento y efecto. Presentación judicial no equivale a recepción personal." }, "id": "AC" }, { "en": { "actor": "Court: approval, reasons and later steps", "evidence": "9 March filings precede the 16 April order. A 17 April response cannot cause the earlier order. Preserve the later protective stay and refusal to convalidate.", "question": "What was actually before the court at each decision, and what did the decision decide about the disputed valuation?", "test": "Obtain the indexed record, service/availability trail, exact reasons and appeal history. Test the applicable criminal threshold and knowledge separately from adverse outcomes or legal error." }, "es": { "actor": "Órgano judicial: aprobación, motivación y actuaciones posteriores", "evidence": "Las presentaciones del 9 de marzo preceden al auto del 16 de abril. Una respuesta del 17 de abril no puede causar el auto anterior. Se conservan la suspensión protectora y la negativa posterior a convalidar.", "question": "¿Qué constaba ante el juzgado en cada decisión y qué resolvió exactamente sobre la valoración controvertida?", "test": "Obtener índice, traslado y disponibilidad del expediente, motivación exacta y recursos. Examinar umbral penal y conocimiento por separado del resultado adverso o error jurídico." }, "id": "COURT" }, { "en": { "actor": "Montelanza / Molina-linked owners: historic conduct", "evidence": "Historic title/community sources, 2011 correspondence and the 2018 allegations form leads, not a collective finding against all owners.", "question": "Which individual had which unit, enforceable duty, control and actual conduct before and after 2008?", "test": "Recover the complete 2008 instruments, performance and breach trail, valid CP resolutions, access/maintenance records and dated unit/title crosswalk. Do not conflate Israeli MULTIMATRIX LTD with the separately locked UK entity." }, "es": { "actor": "Montelanza / propietarios vinculados a Molina: conducta histórica", "evidence": "Las fuentes de títulos y comunidad, la correspondencia de 2011 y las alegaciones de 2018 son pistas; no una conclusión colectiva contra todos los propietarios.", "question": "¿Qué persona tenía qué unidad, obligación exigible, control y conducta efectiva antes y después de 2008?", "test": "Recuperar instrumentos íntegros de 2008, cumplimiento e incumplimiento, acuerdos válidos de CP, mantenimiento y acceso, y correspondencia unidad-título por fecha. No confundir MULTIMATRIX LTD israelí con la entidad británica separada." }, "id": "HISTORIC_CONTROLLERS" }, { "en": { "actor": "Later recipients and beneficiaries", "evidence": "Existing title, RICPE/CNMV and public-support tracks identify later steps. The 2019–2026 correspondence supplies questions and stated limits.", "question": "Did a later title, financing, investor, tax or public-funding decision actually rely on ACTÚA, a derivative figure or a concealed premise?", "test": "Obtain the exact diligence pack, recipients, investment/credit decision and disclosure duty. Later benefit alone does not prove receipt or prior coordination." }, "es": { "actor": "Destinatarios y beneficiarios posteriores", "evidence": "Los ejes existentes de títulos, RICPE/CNMV y ayudas identifican actuaciones posteriores. La correspondencia de 2019–2026 aporta preguntas y límites expresos.", "question": "¿Una decisión posterior de título, financiación, inversión, fiscalidad o ayuda pública se apoyó realmente en ACTÚA, una cifra derivada o una premisa ocultada?", "test": "Obtener documentación exacta de diligencia, destinatarios, decisión de inversión o crédito y deber de información. El beneficio posterior no prueba recepción ni coordinación anterior." }, "id": "DOWNSTREAM" } ], "baseline_main": "5c2dff55dd0745bb97e480eaaaf09acf982a1786", "chain": [ { "en": "Unit, owner/controller and duty at the relevant date", "es": "Unidad, titular/controlador y deber en la fecha pertinente", "state": "UNIT_LEVEL_PROOF_REQUIRED" }, { "en": "Actual non-compliance, access restriction or deterioration", "es": "Incumplimiento, restricción de acceso o deterioro efectivo", "state": "ACT_CAUSE_AND_LAWFUL_EXPLANATIONS_REQUIRED" }, { "en": "Information supplied and condition extrapolated into ACTÚA", "es": "Información aportada y estado extrapolado en ACTÚA", "state": "INPUT_PROVIDER_SAMPLE_AND_VERSION_REQUIRED" }, { "en": "Knowing use in an offer, plan or decision", "es": "Uso consciente en una oferta, plan o decisión", "state": "RECIPIENT_NOTICE_DUTY_AND_RELIANCE_REQUIRED" }, { "en": "Control, lost trading, title transfer or later benefit", "es": "Control, pérdida de explotación, transmisión o beneficio posterior", "state": "TRANSACTION_TRACE_AND_COUNTERFACTUAL_REQUIRED" } ], "claims": [ { "classification": "DOCUMENTARY_FILING_RECORD", "en": { "limit": "Court submission does not establish personal reading, acceptance or deliberate disregard by a particular judge or administrator.", "text": "The 9 March 2018, 14:00 LexNET receipt identifies two annexes whose hashes match the recovered GESVALT appraisal and technical criticism. This advances the chronology from private correspondence to a documented submission to the court.", "title": "Contrary expert material was filed before 16 April" }, "es": { "limit": "La presentación no acredita por sí sola lectura personal, aceptación o desatención deliberada de un juez o administrador concreto.", "text": "El acuse LexNET del 9 de marzo de 2018, a las 14:00, identifica dos anexos cuyas huellas coinciden con la tasación y el análisis crítico de GESVALT recuperados. La cronología pasa de correspondencia privada a una presentación judicial documentada.", "title": "La prueba pericial contraria se presentó antes del 16 de abril" }, "id": "VUSE-C01", "sources": [ "EVID-2018-LEXNET-001", "EVID-2018-ANNEX-001", "EVID-2018-ANNEX-002" ] }, { "classification": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_PARTY_ALLEGATION", "en": { "limit": "The February email does not identify every unit, prove the alleged cause of closure, or locate ACTÚA's photographs.", "text": "Patricia told GESVALT that two minority blocks were closed while the rest traded. GESVALT raised its own preliminary technical criticism the next day. Keep the client's account and the professional's opinion distinct.", "title": "The two-block allegation existed by 20 February" }, "es": { "limit": "El correo de febrero no identifica todas las unidades, acredita la causa alegada del cierre ni localiza las fotografías de ACTÚA.", "text": "Patricia comunicó a GESVALT que dos bloques minoritarios estaban cerrados mientras el resto operaba. Al día siguiente GESVALT formuló su propia crítica técnica preliminar. El relato de la cliente y la opinión profesional tienen distinta naturaleza.", "title": "La alegación de los dos bloques existía el 20 de febrero" }, "id": "VUSE-C02", "sources": [ "EVID-2018-VUSE-003", "EVID-2018-VUSE-004" ] }, { "classification": "SOURCE_QUALIFIED_CRIMINAL_HYPOTHESIS", "en": { "limit": "ACTÚA's mixed photographs, unknown occupation, incomplete access and information about at least 61 units do not identify all owners, establish the 44/61 overlap, or prove a common plan.", "text": "If identified controllers caused or prolonged deterioration, supplied an unrepresentative picture, and knowingly used it to depress a transaction value or block an operating exit, their own condition evidence could also help prove the earlier harm. Each link needs its own source.", "title": "Test the proposed return of the evidence against its users" }, "es": { "limit": "Las fotografías mixtas de ACTÚA, la ocupación desconocida, el acceso incompleto y la información sobre al menos 61 unidades no identifican a todos los propietarios, acreditan el solapamiento 44/61 ni prueban un plan común.", "text": "Si responsables identificados causaron o prolongaron deterioro, aportaron una imagen no representativa y la utilizaron a sabiendas para reducir un valor de transmisión o impedir una salida operativa, su propia prueba de estado podría contribuir a acreditar el perjuicio anterior. Cada enlace exige su fuente.", "title": "Comprobar si la prueba se vuelve contra quienes la utilizaron" }, "id": "VUSE-C03", "sources": [ "EVID-2018-ANNEX-002", "EVID-2018-VUSE-008" ] }, { "classification": "PROFESSIONAL_EVIDENCE_WITH_LIMITS", "en": { "limit": "Different purposes or amounts alone prove neither fraud by ACTÚA nor correctness of every GESVALT input. A proposed appraisal is not a completed appraisal.", "text": "Preserve its rejection of quota-only allocation, report/addressee corrections, later access requirements, special assumptions and its 2025 denial of knowledge of the described ORION/CAM matter. These limit what can fairly be inferred from its work.", "title": "Apply the same scrutiny to GESVALT" }, "es": { "limit": "La diferencia de finalidad o importe no prueba por sí sola fraude de ACTÚA ni la corrección de todos los datos de GESVALT. Una propuesta de tasación no es una tasación terminada.", "text": "Se conservan su rechazo al reparto basado solo en cuotas, las correcciones de versiones y destinatarios, las exigencias posteriores de acceso, las hipótesis especiales y su negativa de conocimiento del asunto ORION/CAM descrito en 2025. Todo ello limita las inferencias admisibles.", "title": "Aplicar el mismo examen a GESVALT" }, "id": "VUSE-C04", "sources": [ "EVID-2018-VUSE-002", "EVID-2018-VUSE-005", "EVID-2020-VUSE-001", "EVID-2021-VUSE-001", "EVID-2025-VUSE-001" ] } ], "controls": { "comparison": "assets/data/sun-park-actua-gesvalt-forensic-comparison-v1.json", "finca_register": "research/sun-park-262-fincas/sun-park-262-fincas.csv", "geometry": "assets/data/sun-park-approved-site-reference-20260912.json", "institutional": "assets/data/sun-park-valuation-institutional-admissions-matrix-20260910.json", "source_digest": "research/sun-park-262-fincas/actua-2018/ACTUA-PRIMARY-SOURCE-DIGEST.md", "source_timeline": "research/sun-park-262-fincas/actua-2018/commissioning-circulation-timeline.md" }, "en": { "actor_heading": "Separate each actor and each decision", "chain_heading": "The alleged chain: test every link", "compact_heading": "ACTÚA: source, notice and continuing use", "compact_link": "Open the evidentiary examination", "compact_text": "Newly recovered 9 March filing receipts and matched GESVALT annexes sharpen the preparation → notice → use → effect inquiry. Read the actor-specific tests and unresolved unit-level links.", "comparison_label": "Existing valuation and institutional comparison", "counter_heading": "Evidence that could weaken or defeat the theory", "counter_text": "Lawful community enforcement, real deterioration, a competent purpose-specific valuation, incomplete access, independent judicial reasoning or a materially different later transaction must be tested. The mixed ACTÚA photos weaken a claim that all images show only Blocks 4–5. Blocks 4+5 have 44 units; numerical agreement alone does not identify GESVALT's approximately 44 poor-condition units or ACTÚA's at least 61. Preserve the 26 June 2018 stay, 24 October 2019 refusal to convalidate and adverse criminal/appeal outcomes, while separately checking practical restoration. The client's allegations and later proposed financing do not certify wrongdoing or completed funding.", "download_label": "Download the source and document-use audit (JSON)", "filing_heading": "9 March 2018: what the recovered filing proves", "gap_heading": "The next decisive records", "heading": "ACTÚA under evidentiary examination", "lead": "The investigation concerns preparation, repeated use and institutional treatment of the valuation. The project alleges that harmful unit-level conduct was turned into a depressed hotel narrative and then used to obtain control or benefit. This section shows the documentary support, competing explanations and missing links.", "loss_heading": "Measure the harm across the hotel", "loss_text": "Test capacity, guest access, common services, maintenance, safety, compliance, shared costs, net trading income, financing opportunity and title value against a dated counterfactual. Identify the affected legal holder and avoid counting the same loss as repair cost, lost income and permanent capital loss. Integration explains possible transmission of harm; it does not establish that every alleged act caused every loss.", "map_label": "Open the canonical map, finca links and six legal layers", "receipt_text": "Aweswell: 14:00, Peninsular time. Two annexes match the receipt hashes; the circulated principal does not. LPB: 12:11. Receipt recovered, but none of its three exact payloads has yet been matched. Signature-certificate validation has not been performed.", "source_heading": "Source register and proof limits" }, "es": { "actor_heading": "Separar cada actor y cada decisión", "chain_heading": "La cadena alegada: comprobar cada enlace", "compact_heading": "ACTÚA: fuentes, conocimiento y uso continuado", "compact_link": "Abrir el examen probatorio", "compact_text": "Los acuses del 9 de marzo recuperados y los anexos coincidentes de GESVALT concretan el examen elaboración → conocimiento → uso → efecto. Consulte las pruebas por actor y los enlaces por unidad todavía pendientes.", "comparison_label": "Comparación e información institucional existentes", "counter_heading": "Prueba que podría debilitar o refutar la hipótesis", "counter_text": "Deben examinarse la ejecución lícita de acuerdos comunitarios, el deterioro real, una valoración competente para su finalidad, el acceso incompleto, la motivación judicial independiente o una transmisión posterior materialmente distinta. Las fotos mixtas de ACTÚA debilitan que todas muestren solo los Bloques 4–5. Estos suman 44 unidades; la coincidencia numérica no identifica las aproximadamente 44 unidades deterioradas de GESVALT ni las al menos 61 de ACTÚA. Se conservan la suspensión del 26 de junio de 2018, la negativa a convalidar del 24 de octubre de 2019 y los resultados penales y de recursos adversos, comprobando por separado la restauración efectiva. Las alegaciones de la cliente y las propuestas posteriores de financiación no certifican delito ni financiación completada.", "download_label": "Descargar el registro de fuentes y usos documentales (JSON)", "filing_heading": "9 de marzo de 2018: qué acredita la presentación recuperada", "gap_heading": "Los próximos documentos decisivos", "heading": "ACTÚA bajo examen probatorio", "lead": "La investigación examina la elaboración, el uso reiterado y el tratamiento institucional de la valoración. El proyecto alega que conductas perjudiciales sobre unidades se transformaron en una imagen depreciada del hotel y se utilizaron para obtener control o beneficio. Este apartado expone apoyo documental, explicaciones alternativas y enlaces pendientes.", "loss_heading": "Medir el perjuicio en el conjunto del hotel", "loss_text": "Examinar capacidad, acceso de huéspedes, servicios comunes, mantenimiento, seguridad, cumplimiento, gastos compartidos, ingreso neto de explotación, oportunidad financiera y valor del título frente a un contrafactual fechado. Identificar al titular jurídico perjudicado y evitar contar la misma pérdida como reparación, lucro cesante y pérdida permanente de capital. La integración explica posibles vías de transmisión; no acredita que cada acto alegado causara todas las pérdidas.", "map_label": "Abrir mapa canónico, enlaces de fincas y seis niveles jurídicos", "receipt_text": "Aweswell: 14:00, hora peninsular. Dos anexos coinciden con las huellas del acuse; el escrito principal circulado no coincide. LPB: 12:11. Acuse recuperado, pero ninguno de sus tres archivos exactos ha sido cotejado con resultado coincidente. No se ha validado el certificado de firma.", "source_heading": "Registro de fuentes y límites probatorios" }, "filings": [ { "annexes": [ { "match": true, "receipt_sha1": "5fe0169a820defbec772a512ec149a31e4d63f9e", "source": "EVID-2018-ANNEX-001" }, { "match": true, "receipt_sha1": "6cbf0f7f088e14b8f89c9d91360494ce0c4c8812", "source": "EVID-2018-ANNEX-002" } ], "id": "AWESWELL_20180309", "principal": { "match": false, "receipt_sha1": "30cbb7d7c763a86b48c267396eb1d34d23fddac0", "recovered_source": "EVID-2018-VUSE-006" }, "proof_state": "RECEIPT_AND_TWO_HASH_MATCHED_ANNEXES_PRINCIPAL_COPY_UNMATCHED", "receipt": "EVID-2018-LEXNET-001", "sent_at": "2018-03-09T14:00:00+01:00", "sent_message_number": "201810197248552" }, { "annexes": [ { "description": "tasacion complejo.PDF", "match": false, "receipt_sha1": "919a375118975659fea6cd40fdff6e3f413175ee" }, { "description": "Critical report v01", "match": false, "receipt_sha1": "d54118ab1646bdf6172e8e2cca426d5524387037" } ], "id": "LPB_20180309", "principal": { "match": false, "receipt_sha1": "073a7d2d0315bcfe5dc204e8161b0dafa9abeac8", "recovered_source": "EVID-2018-VUSE-007" }, "proof_state": "RECEIPT_RECOVERED_EXACT_THREE_PAYLOADS_UNMATCHED", "receipt": "EVID-2018-LEXNET-002", "sent_at": "2018-03-09T12:11:00+01:00", "sent_message_number": "201810197186289" } ], "id": "PD-SP-VALUATION-USE-20260912", "priority_gaps": [ { "en": "Recover both exact filed principals and LPB's two exact annexes; obtain the court index, service and receipt trail. Preserve the matched Aweswell annexes.", "es": "Recuperar ambos escritos principales exactos y los dos anexos exactos de LPB; obtener índice y constancia de traslado y recepción. Conservar los anexos coincidentes de Aweswell.", "id": "P0-EXACT-FILING" }, { "en": "Recover ACTÚA's engagement, payment, drafts, original photos, access records and the source and identities of at least 61 units.", "es": "Recuperar encargo, pago, borradores, fotos originales, accesos y la fuente e identidades de al menos 61 unidades de ACTÚA.", "id": "P0-INPUTS" }, { "en": "Recover the complete 2008 sale/option obligations and performance evidence, plus the 23 December 2011 administrator crosswalk annex. Match each alleged breach to the relevant person and date.", "es": "Recuperar obligaciones íntegras de venta/opción de 2008 y su cumplimiento, y el anexo de correspondencias del administrador del 23 de diciembre de 2011. Vincular cada incumplimiento alegado a persona y fecha.", "id": "P0-2008-UNIT" }, { "en": "For every later act, identify actual reliance and a lawful available alternative; quantify lost net trading, repair and title effects without double counting or assuming financing completion.", "es": "Para cada acto posterior, identificar dependencia real de la valoración y alternativa lícita disponible; cuantificar explotación neta perdida, reparación y efectos sobre títulos sin duplicar ni presumir financiación completada.", "id": "P0-USE-LOSS" } ], "proof_boundaries": { "all_61_units_identified": false, "all_actua_photos_geolocated": false, "all_mail_searched": false, "blocks_4_5_identify_every_44_poor_unit": false, "both_circulated_principals_match_receipts": false, "breach_of_2008_sale_completely_proved_by_recovered_email": false, "cexp_mandatory_bridge": false, "court_filing_equals_personal_judicial_reading": false, "cp_membership_by_title": true, "criminal_intent_proved": false, "judicial_approval_equals_all_inputs_ratified": false, "later_benefit_proves_earlier_coordination": false, "lawful_competing_hypotheses_preserved": true, "lexnet_certificate_signature_validated": false, "march_9_aweswell_annexes_match_receipt": true, "raw_value_gap_proves_fraud": false }, "reference": "^SUN_PARK_ACTUA_DOCUMENT_USE_AUDIT_20260912", "review_date": "2026-09-12", "schema": "por-derecho.sun-park-valuation-document-use-audit.v1", "scope": { "identifier_boundary": "Caret identifies this audit, not a person identity, official certification or criminal finding.", "original_custody": "Native messages and attachments remain in the authorised source mailboxes. Hashes bind recovered PDF copies; not all messages were exported as complete RFC2822 files.", "privacy": "Public-safe source descriptions and hashes only. Native email, complete headers/provider identifiers, privileged advice and unredacted source PDFs remain in the source mailboxes; no new correspondence sent.", "purpose": "Successor for documentary filing, notice, version and continuing-use evidence. Existing comparison remains authority for values, report-purpose distinctions and photo analysis; existing master remains sole geometry. This is not a second property or valuation database.", "scan": "Bounded searches in three owner-connected mailboxes, targeted 2011 and January–April 2018 searches, and selected 2019–2026 GESVALT/counsel threads. This is not an exhaustive search of all mail, all lawyers, or the judicial expediente." }, "sources": [ { "date": "2018-01-30", "description": "Patricia to GESVALT, 12:34 UTC: land classification, activity licence, tourism regime, hotel-wide rights/duties and quota-based allocation discussed.", "does_not_prove": "Actual parcel classification, every licence or enforceability of each claimed obligation.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-001", "kind": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_PARTY_INPUT", "proves": "These issues were put to the valuer before March litigation.", "label": { "en": "30 January: integrated legal and operating regime raised", "es": "30 de enero: régimen jurídico y explotación integrada" } }, { "date": "2018-02-05", "description": "GESVALT rejects allocating all market values simply by community quota; different uses require different market treatment. January–February correspondence separately addresses pools, tables, addressees and reliance.", "does_not_prove": "Every version is correct, or a later addressee change is dishonest.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-002", "kind": "DIRECT_PROFESSIONAL_RESPONSE", "proves": "The professional expressly limited a client allocation request.", "label": { "en": "5 February: quota-only allocation rejected", "es": "5 de febrero: rechazo al reparto solo por cuotas" } }, { "date": "2018-02-20", "description": "Patricia to GESVALT, 10:11 UTC: alleges minority non-compliance caused two blocks to close while the rest traded; requests updated appraisal and criticism of ACTUA.", "does_not_prove": "Which blocks, exact 61 identities, independent occupation measurement, responsibility or intent. Earliest recovered in this bounded review, not necessarily first ever.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-003", "kind": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_PARTY_ALLEGATION", "proves": "A two-block/rest-operating allegation predates the presently controlled April exchange.", "label": { "en": "20 February: two-block closure allegation", "es": "20 de febrero: alegación del cierre de dos bloques" } }, { "date": "2018-02-21", "description": "GESVALT, 17:51 UTC: identifies ACTUA purpose/ECO/net-replacement-cost mismatch and unexplained update calculation.", "does_not_prove": "Court filing of this email or proof that ACTUA knowingly deceived.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-004", "kind": "PRELIMINARY_PROFESSIONAL_CRITIQUE", "proves": "Technical criticism existed contemporaneously, before the final March critical report.", "label": { "en": "21 February: preliminary technical criticism", "es": "21 de febrero: crítica técnica preliminar" } }, { "date": "2018-03-08/2018-03-09", "description": "GESVALT circulates RICS and critical report versions; client requests 171-to-159 apartment correction, full pool allocation and Aweswell addressee. Valuer distinguishes internal-use client from reliance and sends a revised critical report.", "does_not_prove": "All circulated PDFs equal the filed bytes, or normal version corrections themselves establish manipulation.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-005", "kind": "DOCUMENT_VERSION_CHAIN", "proves": "An explicit correction/addressee/version chain exists.", "label": { "en": "8–9 March: correction and addressee chain", "es": "8–9 de marzo: correcciones y destinatario" } }, { "date": "2018-03-09T14:00:00+01:00", "description": "Aweswell allegations to the liquidation plan, Concurso 36/2012 section 5, Mercantil 1 Las Palmas. Receipt recovered as a native attachment to counsel's forwarded filing set.", "document_bytes": 288057, "document_sha256": "b4f4d7bc2a8a252a5d1e47b21e7d5d2a326f25cd2013cf36bb52f61640b64339", "does_not_prove": "Personal judicial reading, agreement, digital-certificate validity or exact complete principal text.", "id": "EVID-2018-LEXNET-001", "kind": "RECOVERED_FILING_RECEIPT", "pages": 2, "proves": "Receipt records submission and identifies the principal and two annexes by hash.", "label": { "en": "Aweswell LexNET receipt", "es": "Acuse LexNET de Aweswell" } }, { "date": "2018-03-01", "description": "Documento 1: 71-page wrapped GESVALT RICS internal-use market appraisal. Cover: Aweswell, 2018-008691-35-04. Printed page 40 (PDF page 41) gives whole-property market opinion EUR 26,400,000, subject to the report's assumptions.", "document_bytes": 6695519, "document_sha256": "9056a58355dd1159c13f4c5907cab744310bbe40a7b1c18fb31e66872c799c4a", "does_not_prove": "EUR 26.4m is the value of LPB's 31 facilities, current value, or direct like-for-like with ACTUA's net replacement cost.", "id": "EVID-2018-ANNEX-001", "kind": "HASH_MATCHED_FILED_EXPERT_ANNEX", "matched_receipt": "EVID-2018-LEXNET-001", "pages": 71, "proves": "The recovered annex matches the receipt's document hash. Cover/value pages visually checked; table values and assumptions require their own purpose/perimeter reading.", "receipt_sha1": "5fe0169a820defbec772a512ec149a31e4d63f9e", "label": { "en": "Filed annex 1: RICS market appraisal", "es": "Anexo 1 presentado: tasación de mercado RICS" } }, { "date": "2018-03-01", "description": "Documento 2: 21-page wrapped critical report. Printed page 19 (PDF page 20) gives six technical conclusions; printed page 20 carries the Article 335.2 LEC declaration dated 7 March.", "document_bytes": 6503815, "document_sha256": "f81b0bcf41e92361893e85ba47b92e68735647d6fa6b7bcf2a96e8711ba04bf0", "does_not_prove": "An expert's disputed criticism is a judicial finding of falsity or fraud.", "id": "EVID-2018-ANNEX-002", "kind": "HASH_MATCHED_FILED_EXPERT_ANNEX", "matched_receipt": "EVID-2018-LEXNET-001", "pages": 21, "proves": "The particular technical criticism, including differentiated condition/depreciation and method/input objections, was an annex to the recorded 9 March filing.", "receipt_sha1": "6cbf0f7f088e14b8f89c9d91360494ce0c4c8812", "signed_date": "2018-03-07", "version_conflict": "Cover expediente 2018-008689-35-01; interior/footer 2018-008691-35-02 and carried-forward client headers vary. Preserve the exact source rather than silently standardising.", "label": { "en": "Filed annex 2: critical report", "es": "Anexo 2 presentado: análisis crítico" } }, { "date": "2018-03-09T12:11:00+01:00", "description": "LPB allegations to the liquidation plan in the same concurso; receipt lists a principal, complex valuation and critical report.", "document_bytes": 229222, "document_sha256": "e308879ed32b1eba6f89f50509c698e5506ae896c3489734920a56471593e136", "does_not_prove": "The three exact payloads have been recovered: the copies checked do not match the listed hashes.", "id": "EVID-2018-LEXNET-002", "kind": "RECOVERED_FILING_RECEIPT", "pages": 2, "proves": "A second earlier filing is recorded and its named annexes identified.", "label": { "en": "LPB LexNET receipt", "es": "Acuse LexNET de LPB" } }, { "date": "2018-03-12", "description": "Aweswell 10-page objections, circulated with filing set.", "document_bytes": 592699, "document_sha256": "0eab87583501da153658829dffa03b58f66239742877ff9a5dabf70f00606f8e", "does_not_prove": "Exact identity with the receipt's filed principal. Its spatial allegations remain party allegations.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-006", "kind": "CIRCULATED_PRINCIPAL_COPY", "pages": 10, "proves": "Content of the recovered circulated copy.", "sha1": "6edfd90d8e8a4591ae459a2f612e58af338a2461", "label": { "en": "Aweswell circulated principal: hash mismatch", "es": "Escrito circulado de Aweswell: huella distinta" } }, { "date": "2018-03-06", "description": "LPB 8-page objections, later circulated by counsel.", "document_bytes": 361942, "document_sha256": "129c5d18ea9bcc8e97404e1bbef2b63613fab38b38b0efb555d89a0bd625c8f3", "does_not_prove": "Exact filed-principal identity or accuracy of its numerical transcriptions. A pleaded 400s/500s photo claim is not proven geolocation.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-007", "kind": "CIRCULATED_PRINCIPAL_COPY", "pages": 8, "proves": "The recovered pleading advances valuation/perimeter/condition objections and alternative sale proposals.", "sha1": "d8a5c58275c3fd0d27f7ba430d546176dd47d3cd", "label": { "en": "LPB circulated principal: hash mismatch", "es": "Escrito circulado de LPB: huella distinta" } }, { "date": "2018-04-17/2018-04-18", "description": "Counsel transmits CAM's response and ACTUA attachments; Patricia alleges two blocks/61 units and asks about access, keys and photo provenance.", "does_not_prove": "A 17 April filing caused the earlier 16 April order; personal receipt of every underlying allegation by each actor.", "id": "EVID-2018-VUSE-008", "kind": "COUNSEL_TRANSMITTAL_AND_PARTY_RESPONSE", "proves": "Procedural circulation and contemporaneous party challenges. The controlled April receipt/writ supplies the separate court-filing layer.", "label": { "en": "17–18 April: procedural circulation and access questions", "es": "17–18 de abril: circulación procesal y accesos" } }, { "date": "2019-08-23/2019-09-20", "description": "GESVALT distinguishes RICS and ECO services and discusses an introduction in connection with a possible financing transaction.", "does_not_prove": "A loan commitment, completed sale, title regularity or acceptance of fraud allegations.", "id": "EVID-2019-VUSE-001", "kind": "DIRECT_PROFESSIONAL_CORRESPONDENCE", "proves": "Professional contact and proposed financing discussions continued.", "label": { "en": "2019: valuation purposes and proposed financing", "es": "2019: finalidades de valoración y financiación propuesta" } }, { "date": "2020-09-16", "description": "After a joint professional call, GESVALT says a rigorous physical-damage/loss assessment and ECO work need interior access; offers a preliminary report scope while access is unavailable.", "does_not_prove": "A completed damages assessment or independent confirmation of each reported occupation/control allegation.", "id": "EVID-2020-VUSE-001", "kind": "PROFESSIONAL_SCOPE_LIMIT", "proves": "Access and inspection limits were expressly raised in later work.", "label": { "en": "2020: access limits for proposed damages work", "es": "2020: límites de acceso en la propuesta de daños" } }, { "date": "2021-12-13/2021-12-20", "description": "GESVALT questions a hotel desktop method and automatic 4.3% appreciation; later proposal separates current maintained condition, completed project and unused-rights scenarios, with licence and project assumptions.", "does_not_prove": "Actual permits, completed works, guaranteed appreciation, future value or recoverable damages.", "id": "EVID-2021-VUSE-001", "kind": "PROFESSIONAL_SCOPE_AND_ASSUMPTIONS", "proves": "Later values depended on defined purpose, access and special assumptions.", "label": { "en": "2021: desktop scope and special assumptions", "es": "2021: alcance de escritorio e hipótesis especiales" } }, { "date": "2025-01-20", "description": "GESVALT's legal director states the firm is unconnected with and lacks knowledge of the described ORION/CAM matter.", "does_not_prove": "An admission of collusion, guilt or 2018 institutional notice. The sender's contrary inference cannot substitute for proof.", "id": "EVID-2025-VUSE-001", "kind": "CONTRARY_RESPONSE", "proves": "An express denial/limitation of knowledge, which must be retained.", "label": { "en": "2025: GESVALT denial of knowledge", "es": "2025: negativa de conocimiento de GESVALT" } }, { "date": "2026-08-25", "description": "Gil requests GESVALT corrections/source preservation and separates 2018 purposes, whole-property values, the 31-finca branch and questions of later use.", "does_not_prove": "Recipient agreement, silence as admission, or proof of every alleged downstream reliance.", "id": "EVID-2026-VUSE-001", "kind": "OWNER_CORRECTION_REQUEST", "proves": "The owner sought correction and clarification of continuing valuation use.", "label": { "en": "2026: owner's correction request", "es": "2026: solicitud de corrección del propietario" } } ], "status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_CRIMINAL_HYPOTHESES_NOT_FINDINGS" }