{
  "schema": "por-derecho.r33-truth-machine-visual.v1",
  "control": "PD-R33-TRUTH-MACHINE-20260925-01",
  "generated_from": {
    "document_id": "C36-SPECIALIST-R33",
    "native_pdf_sha256": "5e0728185cf9b686abd723497d2a53a2656a5e0de4d323a734ed02880eb1d711",
    "private_v3_case_sha256": "ad3b9531986446f73b1bc39e7b5baca2bedb1efdeb8ece06b7175008655fc2c6"
  },
  "structure": {
    "pages": 22,
    "blocks": 206,
    "statement_propositions": 276,
    "paragraph_composites": 206,
    "review_records": 482
  },
  "source_integrity": {
    "native_hash_bound": true,
    "pages_represented": "22/22",
    "preserved_review_anchors": "482/482",
    "statement_scan": "276/276"
  },
  "provisional_v3_statement_states": {
    "UNRESOLVED": 200,
    "RHETORICAL_OR_LEGAL": 64,
    "PARTIAL": 10,
    "SUPPORTED": 2
  },
  "candidate_scan": {
    "statements_with_one_or_more_markers": 179,
    "statement_denominator": 276,
    "candidate_load_percent": 64.9,
    "marker_instances": 271,
    "rules": {
      "CI-001": {
        "label": "Exact quote/context comparison",
        "count": 57
      },
      "CI-025": {
        "label": "Actor/capacity separation",
        "count": 56
      },
      "CI-012": {
        "label": "Quantifier/generalisation",
        "count": 56
      },
      "CI-016": {
        "label": "Causation bridge",
        "count": 41
      },
      "CI-007": {
        "label": "Recontextualisation/context restoration",
        "count": 27
      },
      "CI-014": {
        "label": "Knowledge timing",
        "count": 15
      },
      "CI-034": {
        "label": "Numeric precision",
        "count": 13
      },
      "CI-019": {
        "label": "Character attack vs proposition",
        "count": 4
      },
      "CI-021": {
        "label": "Procedural/finality state",
        "count": 2
      }
    },
    "pages": {
      "1": {
        "candidates": 5,
        "propositions": 10
      },
      "2": {
        "candidates": 5,
        "propositions": 5
      },
      "3": {
        "candidates": 15,
        "propositions": 16
      },
      "4": {
        "candidates": 33,
        "propositions": 36
      },
      "5": {
        "candidates": 9,
        "propositions": 13
      },
      "6": {
        "candidates": 3,
        "propositions": 10
      },
      "7": {
        "candidates": 6,
        "propositions": 10
      },
      "8": {
        "candidates": 5,
        "propositions": 14
      },
      "9": {
        "candidates": 4,
        "propositions": 14
      },
      "10": {
        "candidates": 6,
        "propositions": 10
      },
      "11": {
        "candidates": 6,
        "propositions": 10
      },
      "12": {
        "candidates": 9,
        "propositions": 12
      },
      "13": {
        "candidates": 10,
        "propositions": 16
      },
      "14": {
        "candidates": 8,
        "propositions": 14
      },
      "15": {
        "candidates": 10,
        "propositions": 10
      },
      "16": {
        "candidates": 7,
        "propositions": 8
      },
      "17": {
        "candidates": 4,
        "propositions": 11
      },
      "18": {
        "candidates": 7,
        "propositions": 12
      },
      "19": {
        "candidates": 7,
        "propositions": 8
      },
      "20": {
        "candidates": 9,
        "propositions": 15
      },
      "21": {
        "candidates": 5,
        "propositions": 13
      },
      "22": {
        "candidates": 6,
        "propositions": 9
      }
    }
  },
  "source_complete_context_signoffs": 0,
  "signoff_denominator": 482,
  "worked_examples": [
    {
      "page": 2,
      "type": "false-positive control",
      "summary": "The filing itself says the 2023 classification judgment is under appeal; citing the first-instance judgment is not by itself a finality inversion."
    },
    {
      "page": 3,
      "type": "context-restoration target",
      "summary": "Hostile characterisations appear beside a reproduced project screenshot that visibly says matters remain 'No probado todavía'; later summaries should preserve that proof boundary."
    },
    {
      "page": 5,
      "type": "generalisation target",
      "summary": "The 2020 withdrawal/apology is real adverse evidence. It does not by itself establish a common reason for every lawyer transition; the v3 review records that broader causal inference as unsupported/incomplete."
    }
  ],
  "boundary": "Candidate markers are triage prompts and review-load measures, not findings of falsity, deception, intent, credibility, criminality, guilt or liability. Existing adverse evidence and lawful alternatives remain visible.",
  "updated_at": "2026-09-25",
  "visualization": {
    "fallback": "assets/r33-truth-machine-visual-20260925.svg",
    "width": 1920,
    "height": 1080,
    "vector": true,
    "dynamic_renderer": "assets/truth-machine-live.js",
    "refresh_seconds": 60
  }
}