{
  "schema": "por-derecho.matter-identity-registry.part.v1",
  "registry_id": "PD-SP-IDENTITY-REGISTRY-001",
  "type": "PROCEEDING",
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "PD-SP-R-0021",
      "type": "PROCEEDING",
      "name": "3205/2014 — Juzgado de Instrucción nº 1 de Arrecife",
      "aliases": [
        "DP 3205/2014",
        "D.P. 3205/2014",
        "Procedimiento 4 — DP 3205/2014",
        "Juicio de faltas 3205/2014"
      ],
      "routes": {
        "es": "/por-derecho-setup-or-gitlab-setup/es/dp-3205-2014-arrecife/",
        "en": "/por-derecho-setup-or-gitlab-setup/en/dp-3205-2014-arrecife/"
      },
      "identity_resolution": "CARET_CONFIRMED",
      "master_register_id": "LZ-JUD-043",
      "competent_organ": "PD-SP-I-0023",
      "procedural_state": "PRIMARY_SUMMONS_LOCATED_HEARING_SCHEDULED_OUTCOME_NOT_LOCATED",
      "identity_sources": [
        "PD-SP-SRC-DP3205-2014-COURT-SUMMONS-20140919",
        "PD-SP-SRC-DP3205-2014-POLICE-COMPLAINT-20140903",
        "PD-SP-SRC-DP3205-2014-SUMMARY-20181120"
      ],
      "identity_boundary": "The caret confirms only case number 3205/2014 and the historic organ. The primary summons says Juicio de faltas while the later summary says DP; their exact procedural relationship, hearing occurrence, merits, result and finality remain open."
    }
  ]
}