{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "controlDate": "2026-08-17",
  "caseId": "PROC-2011-1260",
  "spotlight": true,
  "classification": ["FLAGSHIP_CASE", "TEST_CASE", "PRE_INSOLVENCY_OPERATOR_DISPUTE", "PROCEDURAL_IDENTITY_TEST"],
  "status": "PUBLIC-READY-WITH-QUALIFICATION",
  "firstInstance": {
    "court": "Juzgado de Primera Instancia nº 4 de Arrecife",
    "procedure": "Juicio verbal (desahucio por precario)",
    "number": "1260/2011",
    "nig": "3500442120110008131",
    "sourceStatus": "VERIFIED"
  },
  "appeal": {
    "court": "Audiencia Provincial de Las Palmas",
    "roll": "793/2012",
    "resolution": "Sentencia 89/2014",
    "date": "2014-01-13",
    "sourceStatus": "VERIFIED"
  },
  "canonicalQuestions": [
    "Who owned the relevant units at each material date?",
    "What did the 2008 sale/completion and exploitation arrangements require?",
    "What exactly did the plaintiffs plead in December 2011?",
    "What changed in February 2012?",
    "What exact procedural mechanism brought Monterecco Sun Park, S.L. into the case?",
    "What did the first-instance court actually decide?",
    "What did AP Las Palmas 89/2014 actually decide?",
    "Which later actors relied on the judgment, and for what proposition?",
    "Was any later use broader than the proposition actually adjudicated?",
    "What evidence would disprove the Project's procedural-fraud/abuse hypothesis?"
  ],
  "propositions": [
    {
      "id": "PROC-2011-1260-ORIGIN",
      "status": "VERIFIED",
      "publication": "PUBLIC-READY",
      "textEs": "El procedimiento JV 1260/2011 se inició como juicio verbal de desahucio por precario en el JPI nº 4 de Arrecife.",
      "textEn": "JV 1260/2011 began as a verbal eviction-for-precario proceeding in JPI no. 4 Arrecife."
    },
    {
      "id": "PROC-2012-1260-EXTENSION",
      "status": "VERIFIED_WITH_LIMITATION",
      "publication": "PUBLIC-READY-WITH-QUALIFICATION",
      "textEs": "El escrito de 23-feb-2012 registra que la parte actora amplió la acción contra Monterecco Sun Park, S.L. tras conocer un cambio en la explotación.",
      "textEn": "The 23-Feb-2012 pleading records that the claimant side expanded the action against Monterecco Sun Park, S.L. after learning of a change in exploitation.",
      "limitationEs": "La caracterización jurídica exacta —ampliación, sucesión, sustitución, acumulación u otra— debe fijarse con el escrito completo y la resolución que lo admitió.",
      "limitationEn": "The exact legal characterisation —extension, succession, substitution, joinder or another mechanism— must be fixed from the complete pleading and the order that handled it."
    },
    {
      "id": "JUD-2014-089",
      "status": "VERIFIED",
      "publication": "PUBLIC-READY",
      "textEs": "La apelación se tramitó como Rollo 793/2012 y culminó en Sentencia 89/2014 de 13-ene-2014.",
      "textEn": "The appeal proceeded as Roll 793/2012 and culminated in Judgment 89/2014 dated 13-Jan-2014."
    },
    {
      "id": "UNIT-1260-18-PERIMETER",
      "status": "VERIFIED_WITH_LIMITATION",
      "publication": "PUBLIC-READY-WITH-QUALIFICATION",
      "textEs": "La extracción actual del expediente identifica un perímetro de 18 unidades vinculado a la parte actora.",
      "textEn": "The current extraction of the record identifies an 18-unit perimeter linked to the claimant side.",
      "limitationEs": "Debe normalizarse propietario, finca registral, apartamento/local, coeficiente y estado de participación para cada unidad.",
      "limitationEn": "Owner, registry property, apartment/commercial identifier, coefficient and participation status must be normalised for each unit."
    },
    {
      "id": "CEXP-LPB-8896",
      "status": "VERIFIED_WITH_LIMITATION",
      "publication": "PUBLIC-READY-WITH-QUALIFICATION",
      "textEs": "La extracción actual de la sentencia de apelación registra una participación/presencia LPB del 88,96% en la Comunidad de Explotación.",
      "textEn": "The current extraction of the appeal judgment records an 88.96% LPB presence/participation in the Comunidad de Explotación.",
      "limitationEs": "No equivale a autoridad sobre las 18 unidades, ni a mayoría válida de la Comunidad de Propietarios en cualquier fecha posterior.",
      "limitationEn": "It does not equate to authority over the 18 units or a valid property-community majority at any later date."
    },
    {
      "id": "HYP-PROCEDURAL-EQUATION-001",
      "status": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED",
      "publication": "PUBLIC-READY-WITH-QUALIFICATION",
      "textEs": "La iniciativa procesal que conectó el pleito existente con Monterecco fue promovida por la parte actora; queda por fijar la naturaleza jurídica exacta y si la equivalencia material alegada era completa, parcial o incorrecta.",
      "textEn": "The procedural initiative connecting the existing litigation to Monterecco was claimant-driven; the exact legal nature and whether the material equivalence asserted was complete, partial or inaccurate remain to be fixed."
    },
    {
      "id": "HYP-PROCEDURAL-FRAUD-001",
      "status": "WORKING_HYPOTHESIS",
      "publication": "LEGAL-REVIEW-RECOMMENDED",
      "textEs": "Debe investigarse, sin presumirlo, si existió una maquinación fraudulenta, fraude procesal, estafa procesal, falsedad documental u otro abuso de procedimiento.",
      "textEn": "It must be investigated, without presuming it, whether there was fraudulent contrivance, procedural fraud, procedural fraud offence, documentary falsity or another abuse of proceedings.",
      "requiredProof": ["specific act or representation", "objective inconsistency or material omission", "actor-specific knowledge", "judicial or institutional reliance", "causal consequence", "benefit/harm", "alternative innocent explanation tested"]
    }
  ],
  "sourceManifest": [
    {
      "evidenceId": "EVID-2011-1260-CLAIM",
      "title": "Juicio Desahucio por Precario 1260-2011 23DIC2011.pdf",
      "type": "originating pleading / court-file copy",
      "custody": "Google Drive source family",
      "publication": "REPOSITORY-ONLY-UNTIL-PUBLIC-SOURCE-CHECK"
    },
    {
      "evidenceId": "EVID-2012-1260-EXTENSION",
      "title": "Desahucio 1260-2011 ampliación demanda MRSL.pdf",
      "type": "claim extension / amendment",
      "custody": "Google Drive source family",
      "publication": "REPOSITORY-ONLY-UNTIL-PUBLIC-SOURCE-CHECK"
    },
    {
      "evidenceId": "EVID-2012-1260-FIRSTINSTANCE",
      "title": "Proc 1260_2011 (Sentencia Desahucio).pdf",
      "type": "first-instance judgment",
      "custody": "Google Drive source family",
      "publication": "REPOSITORY-ONLY-UNTIL-PUBLIC-SOURCE-CHECK"
    },
    {
      "evidenceId": "EVID-2014-AP89",
      "title": "Sentencia Proc1260-2011 13ENE2014.pdf",
      "type": "appeal judgment",
      "custody": "Google Drive source family",
      "publication": "REPOSITORY-ONLY-UNTIL-PUBLIC-SOURCE-CHECK"
    }
  ],
  "dependencyModel": [
    {"from":"OWN-2008-001","to":"UNIT-1260-18-PERIMETER","relation":"CONSTRAINS_TITLE_AND_PARTICIPATION"},
    {"from":"AUTH-2011-001","to":"PROC-2011-1260","relation":"ALLEGED_UPSTREAM_AUTHORITY_CONTEXT","status":"OPEN"},
    {"from":"PROC-2011-1260","to":"PROC-2012-1260-EXTENSION","relation":"PROCEDURAL_CONTINUATION_OR_EXTENSION","status":"VERIFIED_WITH_LIMITATION"},
    {"from":"PROC-2012-1260-EXTENSION","to":"JUD-2014-089","relation":"DOWNSTREAM_APPELLATE_PATH","status":"VERIFIED"}
  ],
  "bookLinks": [
    {"id":"BOOK-JUSTICE-IN-PIECES","routeEn":"/por-derecho-setup-or-gitlab-setup/en/books/justice-in-pieces/","routeEs":"/por-derecho-setup-or-gitlab-setup/es/libros/justicia-en-fragmentos/","reason":"case study in fragmented decisions and later institutional reuse"},
    {"id":"BOOK-LAW-MOWER-MAN","routeEn":"/por-derecho-setup-or-gitlab-setup/en/books/law-mower-man/","routeEs":"/por-derecho-setup-or-gitlab-setup/es/libros/law-mower-man/","reason":"case study in legal-tech reconstruction, entity resolution and procedural provenance"}
  ],
  "sourceControl": "archive/SUN_PARK_FLAGSHIP_CASE_JV1260_AP89_CANONICAL_CONTROL_17AUG2026.md"
}