Finite questions
- What note, decree, report, dossier or communication supported the 9 Dec 2022 article?
- Was the AEAT binding-report reference checked against the document itself or repeated from a secondary source?
- What material supported the 23 Mar 2023 “total refurbishment” description?
- Was registered-title information on the Sun Park unit perimeter consulted?
- Did La Voz/EKN understand its articles as describing a tourism/operational project rather than unitary ownership?
- Would it add an update if current primary records show that distinction is material?
Reasonable editorial defence
The articles clearly attribute important propositions to Government, RICPE, Canarian Hospitality, promoters and Enrique Guerra. They may accurately have described the tourism and financing project without purporting to determine civil/registered ownership. If so, that explanation should also be clear to readers.
What we ask
We do not seek confidential sources. We ask for traceability of the non-confidential basis, precise attribution and an editorial decision on whether any point should be clarified, updated, corrected or restated.
← Back to media map