{
  "schema": "por-derecho.sun-park-7june-criminal-pivot.v1",
  "control_date": "2026-09-10",
  "status": "ATTRIBUTED_CRIMINAL_HYPOTHESIS_NOT_JUDICIAL_FINDING",
  "central_pivot": "2018-06-07",
  "attribution": "Gil Marer",
  "core_proposition": "Gil Marer alleges that 7 June 2018 is the principal criminal pivot: from that point, acts and omissions by private actors and, as he alleges, the Insolvency Administrator and insolvency judge became part of a two-track architecture in which formal insolvency process continued while material/economic control followed a different path, culminating in alleged formal consolidation in 2022.",
  "timeline": [
    {"date":"2011","label":"PRIVATE SHADOW-ADMINISTRATION MECHANICS","proposition":"Attributed Community debt, voting exclusion, documentary and management functions materially affect LPB.","status":"MIXED_DOCUMENTED_AND_ALLEGED"},
    {"date":"2016","label":"KNOWLEDGE","proposition":"The Insolvency Administrator receives detailed notice of the Community dispute and the contemplated criminal route.","status":"DOCUMENTED_NOTICE_WITH_TRUTH_BOUNDARY"},
    {"date":"2018-01","label":"FORMAL POWER CONCENTRATES IN THE AC","proposition":"Liquidation displaces LPB corporate administration; the AC asserts possession/control and says maintenance/surveillance will be implemented through the Community channel.","status":"DOCUMENTED_WITH_SCOPE_TEST"},
    {"date":"2018-06-07","label":"ALLEGED CRIMINAL PIVOT","proposition":"Material access/control changes through locks, chains, security and exclusion; Gil alleges practical benefit to the Acosta Matos perimeter.","status":"DOCUMENTED_PHYSICAL_DISPUTE_PLUS_ATTRIBUTED_CRIMINAL_THEORY"},
    {"date":"2018-06-13","label":"FUNDED EXIT KNOWN TO AC + JUDGE","proposition":"Professional reconstruction places the coordinated fund/company/operator solution before both institutions; some closing conditions required institutional action.","status":"ATTRIBUTED_PROFESSIONAL_RECONSTRUCTION_NOT_COURT_MINUTE"},
    {"date":"2018-2021","label":"TWO TRACKS ALLEGEDLY DIVERGE","proposition":"Formal liquidation continues while material control, project work and increasing irreversibility are alleged to continue.","status":"CAUSAL_HYPOTHESIS_REQUIRING_ACT_BY_ACT_PROOF"},
    {"date":"2022","label":"ALLEGED FORMAL CONSOLIDATION","proposition":"Gil alleges the adjudication formalises and consolidates a material/economic position created earlier rather than originating it.","status":"ATTRIBUTED_INTERPRETATION_OF_FORMAL_EVENT"}
  ],
  "formal_vs_alleged": [
    {"formal":"Protection/conservation of active estate","alleged":"Loss of access/control and damage to productive-unit integrity"},
    {"formal":"Liquidation under Insolvency Administrator control","alleged":"Private material implementation through the Community/perimeter"},
    {"formal":"Competitive exit/liquidation","alleged":"Fund/company/operator solution requiring institutional cooperation allegedly frustrated while adverse control persisted"},
    {"formal":"Judicial supervision","alleged":"Acts/omissions allegedly preserving the adverse factual position"},
    {"formal":"Fragmented titles remain distinct","alleged":"Hotel-wide practical control allegedly extended beyond LPB to Matkator/third parties"},
    {"formal":"2022 adjudication transfers LPB assets","alleged":"Later formal consolidation of materially acquired control"}
  ],
  "funded_exit_accuracy": {
    "unconditional_cash_available": false,
    "commercially_developed": true,
    "conditional": true,
    "institutional_conditions_to_test": ["judicial mortgage authority","Insolvency Administrator debt certification","other closing/ratification/diligence conditions"],
    "knowledge_boundary": "The Irigoyen professional reconstruction places the solution before judge and Insolvency Administrator on 13 June 2018; it is not a court minute."
  },
  "proof_matrix": {
    "private_community_actors": ["mandate/appointment","debt and voting authority","security/access instructions","keys/cylinders","property scope","recurrence/autonomy of patrimonial functions","payments/banking","project instructions","benefit","knowledge","lawful explanation"],
    "insolvency_administrator": ["specific duty and authority","inventory/possession","Community instructions","2016 and 2018 knowledge","7 June response","court reporting","active-estate/productive-unit preservation","debt certifications","funded-exit conditions requiring AC action","capacity to prevent/reverse","act/omission rationale","causation","mental element","benefit/absence of benefit"],
    "insolvency_judge": ["exact filing/source before court","competence and relief available","notice dates","orders/omissions","legal/factual basis","13 June funded-exit notice","requested authority","capacity to preserve","objective injustice if alleged","historical mental element","causal contribution"],
    "acosta_matos_perimeter": ["person/entity separation","title at each date","Community office/representation","security/access instructions","project preparation","property-specific works","funding/investor representations","2022 meeting/adjudication","later segregation/operation","actual benefit","knowledge","lawful explanation"]
  },
  "criminal_tests": [
    "patrimonial/disloyal administration",
    "procedural fraud only where the historical elements and induced patrimonial decision are proved",
    "frustration of execution or equivalent patrimonial interference where applicable",
    "documentary falsity where the exact document, author, proposition and use are proved",
    "coercion/usurpation/damage for discrete physical acts where elements are satisfied",
    "participation or commission by omission only with specific duty, capacity and causal equivalence",
    "judicial prevarication only with the exact historical elements; adverse outcome is insufficient"
  ],
  "mandatory_boundaries": [
    "All criminal allegations are expressly attributed to Gil Marer and are not judicial findings.",
    "The 2018 criminal line was provisionally dismissed and that dismissal was upheld; recovered evidence does not reverse the decision.",
    "Knowledge of an allegation is not adoption of its truth.",
    "The funded exit was conditional, not unconditional cash already drawable.",
    "The 13 June knowledge proposition is based on a professional reconstruction, not a court minute.",
    "No statement may say Fiscalía Las Palmas accepted a control allegation as true unless a prosecutor-authored source expressly says so.",
    "Later title, finance, operation or benefit does not automatically prove earlier agreement, knowledge, causation or guilt.",
    "Each arrow is a proposition to prove or disprove actor by actor."
  ],
  "public_terms": {
    "preferred": ["parallel appearance of conformity","appearance of compliance","procedural patina"],
    "sham": "Only as Gil Marer's express allegation, never as an established headline fact."
  }
}