{ "control_id": "CONCURSO36-COMMUNITY-AUTHORITY-MATRIX-20260829", "title": "Concurso 36/2012 — Comunidad authority / capacity / standing / personación matrix", "cutoff": "2026-08-30", "status": "controlled_working_matrix", "governance": { "rule": "AUTHORITY BEFORE ARITHMETIC", "trigger_terms": ["Comunidad", "Comunidad de Propietarios", "community", "comunidad de bienes", "cuotas", "derramas", "fees", "honorarios", "gastos", "deuda comunitaria"], "absence_rule": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS does not mean DID NOT EXIST / DID NOT OCCUR.", "criminal_boundary": "Criminal/prosecutorial allegations remain allegations unless judicially established. No row is a finding of guilt.", "denominator_boundary": "This matrix is exhaustive for the actors/entities identified in this controlled authority review; it is not a certified complete judicial docket. A signed/certified complete docket and all poderes/personaciones remain required to establish a negative proposition conclusively." }, "required_fields": [ "actor_entity", "natural_persons", "claimed_role", "legal_form", "authority_relied_upon", "formally_personated_in_36_2012", "document_establishing_standing", "acts_attributed", "court_ac_treatment", "procedural_effect", "patrimonial_effect", "evidence_status", "criminal_legal_issue" ], "rows": [ { "actor_entity": "Comunidad de Propietarios Sun Park / generic ‘Comunidad’ label", "natural_persons": ["Must be resolved incident-by-incident from the ACTA, communication, filing, power or representation relied upon"], "claimed_role": "Owners’ community / collective body; at different points the corpus attributes voting, fee/quota, security, access, common-area and representation acts to a ‘Comunidad’.", "legal_form": "Community of owners / horizontal-property body; exact identity and governing composition must be proved for each date and act.", "authority_relied_upon": "ACTAs, resolutions, office-holding, powers and/or asserted owner-community authority depending on incident. The label alone is never proof of authority.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS as a complete, certified, date-resolved personación record.", "document_establishing_standing": "No single canonical poder/personación instrument has yet been located that answers every material Community intervention. Audit remains open.", "acts_attributed": ["fees/quotas/debt assertions", "community decisions", "security/access decisions", "common-area authority assertions", "communications affecting LPB/masa activa"], "court_ac_treatment": "The corpus contains judicial/AC references to ‘Comunidad’; every such reference requires a separate identity/authority/reliance/effect audit rather than normalization.", "procedural_effect": "Potentially material where a Community representation was received, relied upon, transmitted or given effect; exact effect is incident-specific.", "patrimonial_effect": "Potential effects on LPB, the estate, hotel access/operation, expenditure, income and third-party property require incident-level proof.", "evidence_status": "PARTLY DOCUMENTED / AUTHORITY CHAIN INCOMPLETE", "criminal_legal_issue": "Working allegation: possible unauthorized or misleading use of Community identity/authority. Requires proof of actor, authority, representation, deception/knowledge where relevant, reliance, effect and prejudice." }, { "actor_entity": "3205/2014 — source-reported Community-capacity complainant and affected party", "natural_persons": [ "Source-reported president / complainant — contextual candidate PD-SP-P-0004 (Asunción Aizpurúa Sánchez); primary source form strengthens but does not silently merge the bridge", "Source-reported administrator / affected party — contextual candidate PD-SP-P-0009 (Francisco Mario Matos Matas); shortened primary source form remains controlled" ], "claimed_role": "The contemporaneous complaint records one complainant who claimed to attend as Community president and one affected party described as administrator; these are source-reported/claimed titles, not legitimate office, and the complaint does not record two formal complainants.", "legal_form": "Natural persons; whether either acted personally or for an exactly identified Community legal person is unresolved.", "authority_relied_upon": "The complainant invoked Community president/administrator titles and said they attended to carry out unspecified work. Gil directly alleges that neither person held legitimate office or work authority. No date-effective appointment, resolution, mandate, work order, owner consent, funding authority or exact Community legal person is established.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NO CONCURSO 36/2012 PERSONACIÓN INFERENCE PERMITTED. 3205/2014 is separate, and no source establishes either person's personation in Concurso 36/2012 from this incident.", "document_establishing_standing": "PARTIAL: primary complaint/citation and historical appointment context located; incident-date office, exact Community, mandate, work order, access authority and personation remain open.", "acts_attributed": [ "complaint-maker's claimed use of Community president and administrator descriptions", "reported entry after an access problem and refusal to leave while police mediation was requested", "reported inspection of owners' apartments and key dispute", "making of the contemporaneous complaint" ], "court_ac_treatment": "A court summons scheduled an oral hearing; occurrence and outcome are not located. No insolvency-administration or Concurso treatment is inferred.", "procedural_effect": "A separate Arrecife minor-offence proceeding is documented; counsel/personation, hearing occurrence, disposition, appeal and finality remain unresolved.", "patrimonial_effect": "NOT ESTABLISHED; no estate or patrimonial effect is inferred from the access/key incident.", "evidence_status": "PRIMARY COMPLAINT AND OFFICIAL SUMMONS LOCATED / INCIDENT-DATE AUTHORITY, CORROBORATION AND OUTCOME OPEN", "criminal_legal_issue": "Gil alleges criminal hijacking/capture and holding out of Community authority; a 7-Oct-2014 email proves that counter-allegation existed contemporaneously, not that it was true. Test office, mandate, entry, inspection, key control, first physical act, complaint truth and intent separately. The complaint attributes no direct physical act to Gil. It does not prove injury causation, false complaint, abuse of process, agreement, shadow administration, wrongdoing or liability; genuine Community/owner access, personal access, excessive entry and mutual or defensive confrontation remain live alternatives." }, { "actor_entity": "Pamanil, S.L.", "natural_persons": ["Resolve from date-specific corporate records and Community source documents; do not infer from corporate existence alone"], "claimed_role": "Corporate vehicle appearing in the wider Community/private-actor perimeter; any Community administrative or representative role must be proved by the specific source.", "legal_form": "Sociedad Limitada (S.L.)", "authority_relied_upon": "NOT LOCATED as a complete date-specific Community authority chain in the present controlled corpus.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS.", "acts_attributed": ["Perimeter association only unless a primary Community/court source attributes a specific act"], "court_ac_treatment": "Must be determined per primary filing/order; no standing is inferred from BORME/company existence.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED", "patrimonial_effect": "UNRESOLVED", "evidence_status": "CORPORATE EXISTENCE DOCUMENTED / COMMUNITY AUTHORITY UNRESOLVED", "criminal_legal_issue": "No criminal inference from corporate association. Any alleged use as a Community vehicle requires actor-specific proof." }, { "actor_entity": "Acosta Matos / CAM private-actor perimeter", "natural_persons": ["José Daniel Acosta Matos", "Laura Patricia Acosta Matos", "Francisco Mario Matos Matas", "other persons only where a source identifies them"], "claimed_role": "Creditor/owner/private-actor perimeter and, in allegations, a source or beneficiary of material control; this is not the same legal identity as the Comunidad.", "legal_form": "Exact legal person must be resolved document-by-document; CAM/Acosta Matos naming and form must not be normalized without the primary instrument.", "authority_relied_upon": "Creditor/title/ownership rights and/or Community authority have been asserted in different contexts. Each capacity must remain separate.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "Creditor participation and later procedural treatment exist in the wider record, but a single certified personación denominator for every CAM/Acosta Matos capacity has NOT BEEN LOCATED in this authority audit.", "document_establishing_standing": "Credit/title and court records must be reconciled separately from any asserted Community mandate.", "acts_attributed": ["creditor acts", "owner-position assertions", "presence/access/control allegations", "communications with AC/court", "later acquisition/adjudication lane"], "court_ac_treatment": "Must be disaggregated by capacity. The Community label cannot import creditor or owner standing, and creditor/owner standing cannot itself create Community authority.", "procedural_effect": "Documented in some creditor/title lanes; Community-derived procedural effect remains separately auditable.", "patrimonial_effect": "Potential effects on estate property, hotel control and later title are central to the controlled chronology; causation and legal characterization remain incident-specific.", "evidence_status": "MULTIPLE CAPACITIES DOCUMENTED / COMMUNITY AUTHORITY NOT ESTABLISHED BY CAPACITY ALONE", "criminal_legal_issue": "Working allegations include procedural deception, misuse of authority, de facto control and estate prejudice; no offence is treated as judicially established by this matrix." }, { "actor_entity": "Francisco Mario Matos Matas", "natural_persons": ["Francisco Mario Matos Matas"], "claimed_role": "Private actor alleged to have exercised or participated in Community-facing and de facto/shadow-control functions.", "legal_form": "Natural person", "authority_relied_upon": "Any claimed Community office, mandate, owner authority or corporate authority must be proved per incident; relationship/perimeter evidence is not enough.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS in his personal capacity for the acts under this authority audit.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS for a general Community mandate.", "acts_attributed": ["alleged material/de facto control", "Community-facing acts", "hotel/access/operation-related conduct where primary sources identify him"], "court_ac_treatment": "Requires incident-level reconstruction; no generalized judicial authorization is inferred.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED / INCIDENT-SPECIFIC", "patrimonial_effect": "Alleged control effects require source-by-source attribution and accounting.", "evidence_status": "ALLEGATION WITH DOCUMENTARY LEADS / AUTHORITY INCOMPLETE", "criminal_legal_issue": "Investigate alleged de facto administration/control and any false-authority or participation theory against statutory elements, knowledge/intent, contrary evidence and prejudice." }, { "actor_entity": "Antonio Cogolludo Rojas", "natural_persons": ["Antonio Cogolludo Rojas"], "claimed_role": "Private/corporate actor in the security, operations and Community-related perimeter; a corporate role does not itself establish Community authority.", "legal_form": "Natural person", "authority_relied_upon": "Date-specific company powers and any alleged Community mandate must be separated. No back-projection from later corporate appointments is permitted.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS in his personal capacity for the Community-related acts under review.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS for a general Community mandate.", "acts_attributed": ["security/operational perimeter", "corporate acts", "Community-facing/de facto-control allegations where sources identify him"], "court_ac_treatment": "Requires incident-level proof; no standing is inferred from company office or association.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED / INCIDENT-SPECIFIC", "patrimonial_effect": "Potential access/security/operation effects require source and accounting proof.", "evidence_status": "CORPORATE LINKS DOCUMENTED / COMMUNITY AUTHORITY UNRESOLVED", "criminal_legal_issue": "Any participation/de facto-control allegation must be tested actor-specifically; association alone is insufficient." }, { "actor_entity": "Shaila María Cogolludo Ramos (also encountered in variants Sheila/Shayla)", "natural_persons": ["Shaila María Cogolludo Ramos"], "claimed_role": "Private/corporate actor in the wider perimeter; later documented corporate powers must not be back-projected to 2018 Community authority.", "legal_form": "Natural person", "authority_relied_upon": "Later corporate powers exist in the wider network record; they do not establish a 2018 Community mandate without a contemporaneous source.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS in her personal capacity for the Community-related acts under review.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS for a contemporaneous Community mandate relevant to 2018.", "acts_attributed": ["Perimeter/corporate participation and alleged de facto-control conduct only where a primary source identifies her"], "court_ac_treatment": "Requires incident-level proof; later powers are not retrospective authority.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED", "patrimonial_effect": "UNRESOLVED / INCIDENT-SPECIFIC", "evidence_status": "LATER CORPORATE POWER DOCUMENTED / 2018 COMMUNITY AUTHORITY NOT ESTABLISHED", "criminal_legal_issue": "No inference of 2018 participation or intent from later corporate authority. Any allegation requires contemporaneous evidence." }, { "actor_entity": "José Daniel Acosta Matos", "natural_persons": ["José Daniel Acosta Matos"], "claimed_role": "Natural person within the Acosta Matos creditor/owner/business perimeter; any Community capacity is a separate question.", "legal_form": "Natural person", "authority_relied_upon": "Must be established from the specific credit, title, corporate or Community instrument; capacities cannot be merged.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS in his personal capacity for a general Community mandate.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED for a general Community authority; separate creditor/corporate evidence does not answer this question.", "acts_attributed": ["Acosta Matos perimeter acts where primary sources identify him"], "court_ac_treatment": "Must be identified by exact actor and capacity in each filing/order.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED AS COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE", "patrimonial_effect": "UNRESOLVED AS COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE", "evidence_status": "PERIMETER RELATIONSHIP / COMMUNITY CAPACITY UNRESOLVED", "criminal_legal_issue": "No criminal inference from family/corporate relationship. Any authority or participation allegation must be actor-specific." }, { "actor_entity": "Laura Patricia Acosta Matos", "natural_persons": ["Laura Patricia Acosta Matos"], "claimed_role": "Natural person within the Acosta Matos business perimeter; any Community capacity is a separate question.", "legal_form": "Natural person", "authority_relied_upon": "Must be established from the specific corporate, title or Community instrument; relationship alone is insufficient.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS in her personal capacity for a general Community mandate.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED for a general Community authority.", "acts_attributed": ["Business/perimeter acts only where a primary source identifies her"], "court_ac_treatment": "Must be identified by exact actor and capacity in each filing/order.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED AS COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE", "patrimonial_effect": "UNRESOLVED AS COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE", "evidence_status": "PERIMETER RELATIONSHIP / COMMUNITY CAPACITY UNRESOLVED", "criminal_legal_issue": "No criminal inference from family/corporate relationship. Any authority or participation allegation must be actor-specific." }, { "actor_entity": "Pamalexsha Servicios Integrales, S.L.", "natural_persons": ["Antonio Cogolludo Rojas — corporate role documented in the wider network record; exact dates/capacity govern"], "claimed_role": "Corporate vehicle in the wider private-actor/security/operations network; not treated as the Comunidad merely because of association.", "legal_form": "Sociedad Limitada (S.L.)", "authority_relied_upon": "Corporate authority only unless a contemporaneous Community instrument proves otherwise.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS as Community representative.", "acts_attributed": ["Corporate/security/operations perimeter where supported"], "court_ac_treatment": "No Community standing inferred from corporate role.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED", "patrimonial_effect": "UNRESOLVED / INCIDENT-SPECIFIC", "evidence_status": "CORPORATE ROLE DOCUMENTED / COMMUNITY AUTHORITY UNRESOLVED", "criminal_legal_issue": "Any use as an instrument of alleged de facto control must be proved by transactions, instructions, conduct and knowledge, not association." }, { "actor_entity": "Explotaciones Noalpa, S.L.", "natural_persons": ["Antonio Cogolludo Rojas — corporate role documented", "Shaila María Cogolludo Ramos — later power documented; no retrospective projection"], "claimed_role": "Corporate vehicle in the wider private-actor perimeter; no automatic Community identity or authority.", "legal_form": "Sociedad Limitada (S.L.)", "authority_relied_upon": "Corporate powers only unless a separate contemporaneous Community mandate is produced.", "formally_personated_in_36_2012": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS.", "document_establishing_standing": "NOT LOCATED IN THE PRESENT CONTROLLED CORPUS as Community representative.", "acts_attributed": ["Corporate/perimeter acts where supported"], "court_ac_treatment": "No Community standing inferred from corporate role.", "procedural_effect": "UNRESOLVED", "patrimonial_effect": "UNRESOLVED / INCIDENT-SPECIFIC", "evidence_status": "CORPORATE ROLE DOCUMENTED / COMMUNITY AUTHORITY UNRESOLVED", "criminal_legal_issue": "Any alleged instrumental or de facto-control use requires primary actor/conduct/knowledge evidence." } ], "source_controls": [ "CONCURSO36_UNITARY_CRIMINAL_FIRST_GOVERNANCE.md", "CONCURSO36_CONTROLLING_CONCLUSIONS_29AUG2026.md", "CHATGPT_START_HERE_CONCURSO36_DUAL_LENS_GOVERNANCE.md", "assets/data/concurso36-controlling-conclusions-supplement-20260829.json", "assets/data/community-professional-corporate-network-v1.json", "assets/data/ac-private-actor-de-facto-administration-v1.json", "assets/data/criminal-first-shadow-administration-allegation-v1.json", "archive/DP3205_2014_ARRECIFE_SOURCE_TRANSLATION_AUTHORITY_ALLEGATIONS_CONTROL_30AUG2026.md", "assets/data/dp3205-2014-arrecife-v1.json", ".github/governance/COMMUNITY_CLAIMED_OFFICE_CRIMINAL_FIRST_AUTHORITY_PROTOCOL_30AUG2026.md", "archive/declarations/019_GIL_DP3205_CLAIMED_AUTHORITY_GUEST_CONTEXT_CONTINUITY_20260830.md", "en/community-instrumentalisation/index.html", "en/de-facto-administration-community-ac/index.html" ] }